|
Locked
Re: restricting classification yards by location
#operationspro
I thought of that.? That is a good idea.??
-- Tom |
|
Brian, I doubt that LogixNG will ever supplant Logix. ?However, Logix will probably never be enhanced. ?All new capabilities will be done in LogixNG. ?It is designed to be extended. ?For example, adding a new table type is done by adding new classes. ?Logix required modifying the existing code which is risky. For people who are comfortable with if-then-else, loops and sub-routines, the LogixNG concepts are easy to understand. ?In addition to language type structures, there are lot of specialized actions. Here is a LogixNG that eliminated calls to several Jython scripts. Dave Sand ----- Original message ----- From: Brian Wong <blwatlongwood@...> Subject: [jmriusers] logix vs logixNG Date: Friday, May 05, 2023 3:19 PM For a new installation, is there any reason to use logix as opposed to logixng? It appears that NG is intended to (eventually) completely supplant logix, so probably the answer is no. However I suppose that there may be some straggling bits that haven't been redone yet or something like that. |
|
Locked
Re: Signal Mast Logic
#signalmasts
#turnouts
Hi Dave, Your solution works fine it is the correct way. Thanks for your help. 颁é蝉补谤
En viernes, 5 de mayo de 2023, 22:28:56 CEST, Dave Sand <ds@...> escribió:
颁é蝉补谤, Try this crazy idea. Remove Invert from the linked turnouts. ?Set the "Continuing Route Turnout State" for CanvV6V20 to Thrown. ?This makes the diverging leg be the Closed position. Remove and re-discover the SML routes between the two turnouts. ? See if this makes a difference after storing and re-starting. Dave Sand ----- Original message ----- From: "Cesar Alcala via groups.io" <shegar81=[email protected]> Subject: Re: [jmriusers] Signal Mast Logic #signalmasts #turnouts Date: Friday, May 05, 2023 3:09 PM Hi, I will try to show it by images. I have this layout. You can see the signals SAL2O( text above the signal) and S2/6 ( text next to the signal) that text is next to them. Also there is involved turnouts CanvV6V2O( turnoutbelow the text) and CanvV2V6O(turnout above the text) Configuration of turnout CanvV2V6O On signalMast logic this is what happens about the position on the turnouts. I tried to configure SignalMast Logic it without the link between turnouts and it works correctly even if I establish later the connection but when I start JMRI it happens this. I hope it is clearer now with the images Best Regards 颁é蝉补谤 En viernes, 5 de mayo de 2023, 21:38:44 CEST, Dave Sand <ds@...> escribió: 颁é蝉补谤, We will need a least a picture of what you are trying to do. ?The best approach is to upload the xml file to the group's ProblemsBeingWorkedOn file folder. Dave Sand ----- Original message ----- From: "Cesar Alcala via groups.io" <shegar81=[email protected]> Subject: [jmriusers] Signal Mast Logic #signalmasts #turnouts Date: Friday, May 05, 2023 2:29 PM Hello, I have detected and issue on the signal mast logic or at least I have the problem. It is related to turnouts that are connected. I have two turnouts that are directly connected one on closed position and the other on throw. On the configuration on the turnout I linked both turnouts and I selected to invert the second one. It worked perfectly so both turnouts are paired and when route is established at them goes straight and in the oposite position goes to another path. When I used the discover to establish the pairing signals all goes perfectly but when I tried to work always the signal is on danger. I forced to change aspect but it is not the correct way. When I analysed the signal mast Logic I released that turnouts aren't correctly. Both where considered as throw instead of one throw and the other closed to be active so it is not possible to link them. If I didn't put this link the pairing is correct with the Signal Mast Logic that is the way I did actually the configuration. I am using JMRI on its 5.2 version so it is upgraded until last production version, is it a problem on this last version or it was also on previous versions? Best Regards 颁é蝉补谤 |
|
Locked
Re: Signal Mast Logic
#signalmasts
#turnouts
颁é蝉补谤, Try this crazy idea. Remove Invert from the linked turnouts. ?Set the "Continuing Route Turnout State" for CanvV6V20 to Thrown. ?This makes the diverging leg be the Closed position. Remove and re-discover the SML routes between the two turnouts. ? See if this makes a difference after storing and re-starting. Dave Sand ----- Original message ----- From: "Cesar Alcala via groups.io" <shegar81=[email protected]> Subject: Re: [jmriusers] Signal Mast Logic #signalmasts #turnouts Date: Friday, May 05, 2023 3:09 PM Hi, I will try to show it by images. I have this layout. You can see the signals SAL2O( text above the signal) and S2/6 ( text next to the signal) that text is next to them. Also there is involved turnouts CanvV6V2O( turnoutbelow the text) and CanvV2V6O(turnout above the text) Configuration of turnout CanvV2V6O On signalMast logic this is what happens about the position on the turnouts. I tried to configure SignalMast Logic it without the link between turnouts and it works correctly even if I establish later the connection but when I start JMRI it happens this. I hope it is clearer now with the images Best Regards 颁é蝉补谤 En viernes, 5 de mayo de 2023, 21:38:44 CEST, Dave Sand <ds@...> escribió: 颁é蝉补谤, We will need a least a picture of what you are trying to do. ?The best approach is to upload the xml file to the group's ProblemsBeingWorkedOn file folder. Dave Sand ----- Original message ----- From: "Cesar Alcala via groups.io" <shegar81=[email protected]> Subject: [jmriusers] Signal Mast Logic #signalmasts #turnouts Date: Friday, May 05, 2023 2:29 PM Hello, I have detected and issue on the signal mast logic or at least I have the problem. It is related to turnouts that are connected. I have two turnouts that are directly connected one on closed position and the other on throw. On the configuration on the turnout I linked both turnouts and I selected to invert the second one. It worked perfectly so both turnouts are paired and when route is established at them goes straight and in the oposite position goes to another path. When I used the discover to establish the pairing signals all goes perfectly but when I tried to work always the signal is on danger. I forced to change aspect but it is not the correct way. When I analysed the signal mast Logic I released that turnouts aren't correctly. Both where considered as throw instead of one throw and the other closed to be active so it is not possible to link them. If I didn't put this link the pairing is correct with the Signal Mast Logic that is the way I did actually the configuration. I am using JMRI on its 5.2 version so it is upgraded until last production version, is it a problem on this last version or it was also on previous versions? Best Regards 颁é蝉补谤 |
|
They both end up with the same logic.
Logix is a traditional function configuration (like that which used to be used in Programmable Logic Controllers). LogixNG is a language construct similar to Object Programming (new stuff). It's like different human interface looking at the same thing. Use whichever you're comfortable with. I've used both. I'm an old dog that grew up with the functional configurations. -- Ken NYNH&H, Old Colony Division, Cape Cod Branch (1949-1959) [DB150][PR3][QuadLN_S][JMRI 5.3.5] |
|
Locked
Re: Signal Mast Logic
#signalmasts
#turnouts
Hi, I will try to show it by images. I have this layout. You can see the signals SAL2O( text above the signal) and S2/6 ( text next to the signal) that text is next to them. Also there is involved turnouts CanvV6V2O( turnoutbelow the text) and CanvV2V6O(turnout above the text) Configuration of turnout CanvV2V6O On signalMast logic this is what happens about the position on the turnouts. I tried to configure SignalMast Logic it without the link between turnouts and it works correctly even if I establish later the connection but when I start JMRI it happens this. I hope it is clearer now with the images Best Regards 颁é蝉补谤
En viernes, 5 de mayo de 2023, 21:38:44 CEST, Dave Sand <ds@...> escribió:
颁é蝉补谤, We will need a least a picture of what you are trying to do. ?The best approach is to upload the xml file to the group's ProblemsBeingWorkedOn file folder. Dave Sand ----- Original message ----- From: "Cesar Alcala via groups.io" <shegar81=[email protected]> Subject: [jmriusers] Signal Mast Logic #signalmasts #turnouts Date: Friday, May 05, 2023 2:29 PM Hello, I have detected and issue on the signal mast logic or at least I have the problem. It is related to turnouts that are connected. I have two turnouts that are directly connected one on closed position and the other on throw. On the configuration on the turnout I linked both turnouts and I selected to invert the second one. It worked perfectly so both turnouts are paired and when route is established at them goes straight and in the oposite position goes to another path. When I used the discover to establish the pairing signals all goes perfectly but when I tried to work always the signal is on danger. I forced to change aspect but it is not the correct way. When I analysed the signal mast Logic I released that turnouts aren't correctly. Both where considered as throw instead of one throw and the other closed to be active so it is not possible to link them. If I didn't put this link the pairing is correct with the Signal Mast Logic that is the way I did actually the configuration. I am using JMRI on its 5.2 version so it is upgraded until last production version, is it a problem on this last version or it was also on previous versions? Best Regards 颁é蝉补谤 |
|
YAY my Ethernet shield showed up today!!……….now what? I have two groove 125khz sensors and an uno. I plan to buy more sensors in the near future. Can someone please provide a step per step for hooking it up, then programming followed by the required JMRI settings. Thank you?
Micheal (aka the computer, but eager dummy)? |
|
Locked
restricting classification yards by location
#operationspro
Hello again,
I currently have a yard where I have classification/interchange tracks set up by location, which works ok.? What I do find is that this restriction does reduce car movement, which is expected, because if a C/I track is full for a specific location, a car cannot be moved there with a final destination of that location, and cannot use another empty track due to an incorrect location.? I would like to make a change to get rid of the restriction of location on my C/I tracks, so that cars from any location can use any classification track.? Without these location restrictions, will OperationsPro attempt to block cars by final destination when sending cars to a C/I track when possible??? Thanks. -- Tom |
|
Locked
Re: track doesn't accept custom loads even though track is configured to accept all loads
#operationspro
Hi Dan/Pete,
Makes total sense now.? Thank you for your help.?? -- Tom |
Tom Myrick
Ken Heywood
Micheal Hodgson
Ken Cameron