Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Jmriusers
- Messages
Search
Locked
Welcome to the JMRI Users group
Welcome to the JMRI user's discussion group. This the place to ask questions, make suggestions, complain and complement.
There's more information available on the main JMRI web page: and the main page for DecoderPro: Decoder Pro is a program to make it easier to program DCC decoders. -- -------------- Bob Jacobsen (Bob_Jacobsen@..., 510-486-7355, fax 510-495-2957) |
Locked
JMRI, DecoderPro update 0.9.2 is available
The 0.9.2 update to the DecoderPro program and JMRI libraries is available for download.
The update file is in .zip format, and should be usable on Macintosh, Windows, Linux and OS/2. You can download it from SourceForge by following this link: <> This update contains only updated files; you need the entire 0.9 distribution to use the program. If you don't have that, please see the JMRI and DecoderPro README files for how to download and install it: To install this update, copy the "jmri.jar" file and the "xml" directory to your existing DecoderPro or JmriDemo directory. That's all that's needed! New features in this update: Updated Soundtraxx DSD/DSX Diesel definitions to fix a programming error Cleaned up LocoIO programmer interface New features in the 0.9.1 update, also included here: Additional decoder definitions: Many Lenz decoders, courtesy Debbie Ames and Lenz USA Updates to Soundtraxx decoders, additional types New EasyDCC support in DecoderPro and the JMRI tools LocoIO programmer for both early (1.3.2) and later (1.3.4) LocoIO PIC code. Initial support in JMRI libraries for: Remote LocoNet server and client CTC panel edit, store, load C/MRI serial attachment Note that these are still in development, and should not be considered ready for general use. Various minor bug fixes and updates, including reduced memory usage and improved error logging. -- -------------- Bob Jacobsen (Bob_Jacobsen@..., 510-486-7355, fax 510-495-2957) |
Locked
Re: Just wondering if anyone was here
I'm here.. as is Bob...
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-Dave Falkenburg On Tuesday, May 7, 2002, at 02:01 PM, sixth_rule wrote:
i got a couple questions and was wondering if anyone was actually |
Locked
Re: Just wondering if anyone was here
i got a couple questions and was wondering if anyone was actuallyI'm happy to help with questions, and there are other members who can help too. This Yahoo group is still pretty young, so hasn't gotten a lot of traffic yet. Note that there's a short delay in posting (perhaps as much as 12 hours, but usually shorter) because I've got this group set on "moderate new members". That's because other Yahoo groups have been being spammed recently. Once I'm convinced somebody is a real email address, I remove them from moderated status. Bob -- -------------- Bob Jacobsen (Bob_Jacobsen@..., 510-486-7355, fax 510-495-2957) |
Locked
Re: Just wondering if anyone was here
I'm here, Bob. I am not currently using jmri stuff, but am interested in
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
following the progress. Count me in. Jerry Drews -----Original Message-----
From: Bob Jacobsen [mailto:Bob_Jacobsen@...] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 4:41 PM To: jmriusers@... Subject: Re: [jmriusers] Just wondering if anyone was here i got a couple questions and was wondering if anyone was actuallyI'm happy to help with questions, and there are other members who can help too. This Yahoo group is still pretty young, so hasn't gotten a lot of traffic yet. Note that there's a short delay in posting (perhaps as much as 12 hours, but usually shorter) because I've got this group set on "moderate new members". That's because other Yahoo groups have been being spammed recently. Once I'm convinced somebody is a real email address, I remove them from moderated status. Bob -- -------------- Bob Jacobsen (Bob_Jacobsen@..., 510-486-7355, fax 510-495-2957) To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: jmriusers-unsubscribe@... Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to |
Locked
Laptop for DecoderPro Use
Jim Hanna
Hi Bob:
I have the program in my PC but it is far from the train room so I don't get to use it except when one of my operators brings over a laptop. My question is sort of basic(dumb)but I would like some information on what to look for in a laptop if I were to go out and buy one. Most models I have seen on the internet start at about $1500 and go up from there. I can probably equip my entire fleet of engines with Soundtraxx decoders for that kind of money so I need info on the very most basic laptop that I can expect to use successfully with Decoder Pro and not have it cost an "arm & a leg"...am I just dreaming or is this a possibility? I am probably talking about a used instrument and also wonder if this is a reasonable possibility? Thanks in advance for any pointers you can give me. Jim Hanna El Cajon, CA |
Locked
Re: Laptop for DecoderPro Use
At 8:08 PM -0700 5/7/02, Jim Hanna wrote:
I would like some information on what to look for in a laptop if I were... I need info on the very most basic laptop that I can expect to useAlthough I'm a Macintosh bigot, you can probably get a better deal on a PC laptop. I'd look for something with 48MB of memory, Windows95, at least one serial port, and a 180MHz CPU or better. That's not much, so it should be possible to find something like that used for less than $500, perhaps much less. More memory, more speed might be good if you want to use a more recent Windows version. But, it might make more financial sense to pick up a used command station for your existing PC instead. I've seen used SystemOne units for much less than a laptop would cost. And running a long cable can be really cost-effective! That does leave you with the hassle of walking to the train room when you want to change the loco on the programming track, unfortunately. Bob -- -------------- Bob Jacobsen (Bob_Jacobsen@..., 510-486-7355, fax 510-495-2957) |
Locked
Re: Laptop for DecoderPro Use
Mike Davison
Bob weighed in as the Mac bigot so I guess it's up to me to provide the Linux
bigot viewpoint. I have a Sony Viao 505TR (value less than $500 now) that runs DecoderPro pretty well. I say 'pretty well' because this machine doesn't have much memory and is slow. Everything works correctly, but some actions are slow. For example, there is a 10-20 delay to open the programmer window. The point: one can buy a low-end PC laptop, run Linux and run DecoderPro. Be sure you include the cost of a serial port when looking at a PC laptop that you intend to use with a DCC command station. Some newer laptops don't include serial ports so you'd need one of those USB-RS232 converters (I'm guesssing they would work) or some additional proprietary hardware. My Sony came with a 'port replicator' that has all the old bulky ports, but newer Sonys do not include this so you'd have to spend another $75-100 to get a serial port. cheers, Mike On Tuesday 07 May 2002 08:08 pm, Jim Hanna wrote: Hi Bob:get to use it except when one of my operators brings over a laptop. to look for in a laptop if I were to go out and buy one. Most models I have seen on the internet start at about $1500 and go up from there. I can probably equip my entire fleet of engines with Soundtraxx decoders for that kind of money so I need info on the very most basic laptop that I can expect to use successfully with Decoder Pro and not have it cost an "arm & a leg"...am I just dreaming or is this a possibility? I am probably talking about a used instrument and also wonder if this is a reasonable possibility?
|
Locked
Re: Laptop for DecoderPro Use
Jim Hanna
To Our New Group:
Thanks for your input on my recent question RE: laptops. I think your ideas about getting a used PC instead of a laptop really is the best solution to the situation. I have plenty of room under the layout for storage of the PC when not in use...why didn't I think of this!!!??? Thanks again to all, Jim Hanna El Cajon, CA |
Locked
Re: Laptop for DecoderPro Use
Jon Miller
Jim,
What I did was go to my local PC guy and told him I wanted the cheapest one available to connected to my trains. He went to his old parts and put one together for $150, Win98, 128M, 233M mem, Intel chip, CD, extra ports, etc. With some states charging disposal fees for tubes it might be possible to get one of those free for the taking. The only problem with this idea is, of course, room! Jon Miller AT&SF For me time has stopped in 1941 Digitrax DCC owner, Chief system NMRA Life member #2623 Member SFRH&MS |
Locked
Re: Laptop for DecoderPro Use
As far as PCs go, I managed to pick up a Shuttle SV24 barebones system +
1.1GHz Celeron at Fry's electronics for $250 a few months ago. (I think it is now obsolete & discontinued) I had some extra RAM, an old HD, and a CD-ROM laying around. Adding those things brings the price up another couple hundred bucks. It is a very nice small box-- I need it for microcontroller development. At work I'm buried up to my ears in iBooks (I work at Apple) and Keyspan serial adapters (we use them for kernel debugging) On the Macintosh front: If you are interested in a NEW nice small laptop that runs Linux/Mac OS X well, the most recent iBooks are now being sold for about $999 at ComputerWare/Elite Computers here in the valley. Older CRT iMacs are available for about $599 in some places as well. You need to add a Keyspan PDA Adapter for about $39 to get a 9-pin COM port. Also it is important to note that you really need to be running OS X for Java to work decently well on a Mac— the version on Mac OS 9 really sucks. -Dave Falkenburg |
Locked
Re: Laptop for DecoderPro Use
At 9:25 AM -0700 5/8/02, Dave Falkenburg wrote:
Also it is important to note that you really need to be running OS X forI do keep DecoderPro running on MacOS 8.1 through 9, but I agree that it's really a dog. Startup performance is particularly slow; on my 90MHz test machine, it can take 20+ seconds for the program to load and start. That seems like forever. During programming operations, it doesn't seem so bad, as you're just clicking controls and waiting for the command station to do its thing. But it does work, and I intend to keep it working so that people with older Macintosh hardware have something they can use to program decoders. The layout-control half of the code is much more problematic on earlier Macs. They have trouble keeping up with mid-size layouts. Bob -- -------------- Bob Jacobsen (Bob_Jacobsen@..., 510-486-7355, fax 510-495-2957) |
Locked
Update 0.9.3 for DecoderPro, JMRI is available
The 0.9.3 update to the DecoderPro program and JMRI libraries is available.
The update file can be downloaded from: It is in .zip format, and should be usable on Macintosh, Windows, Linux and OS/2. The update contains only updated files; you need the entire 0.9 distribution to use the program. If you don't have that, please see the JMRI and DecoderPro README files for how to download and install it: DecoderPro: JMRI demo: To install this update, copy the "jmri.jar" file and the "xml" directory to your existing DecoderPro or JmriDemo directory. If you haven't written your own decoder files, that's all that's needed! If you have your own decoder files, you need to remake the index by starting the program and selecting "Create index file" from the tools menu. New features in this update: * EasyDCC support has been tested, and should now be working well. * Additional Soundtraxx, Lenz and NCE decoders. * You can now select register, paged or direct mode for programming if your command station supports them. This lets you program MRC and other register-mode-only decoders. * Improved automatic identification of decoders, especially cases where the version number isn't unique or isn't recognized. * Programmer window will no longer appear behind the Start Bar on Windows. * Can now build the libraries and application with the Ant command line tool. * Now properly handles older locomotive files with newer decoder files, which lets us update definitions in place. New features in the 0.9.2 update, also included here:</h3> * Updated Soundtraxx DSD/DSX Diesel definitions to fix a programming error * Cleaned up LocoIO programmer interface New features in the 0.9.1 update, also included here:</H3> * Additional decoder definitions: Many Lenz decoders, courtesy Debbie Ames and Lenz USA Updates to Soundtraxx decoders, additional types * New EasyDCC support in DecoderPro and the JMRI tools * LocoIO programmer for both early (1.3.2) and later (1.3.4) LocoIO PIC code. * Initial support in JMRI libraries for: Remote LocoNet server and client CTC panel edit, store, load C/MRI serial attachment Note that these are still in development, and should not be considered ready for general use. * Various minor bug fixes and updates, including reduced memory usage and improved error logging. -- -------------- Bob Jacobsen (Bob_Jacobsen@..., 510-486-7355, fax 510-495-2957) |
Locked
What next for DecoderPro?
The 0.9.3 update is out, so after I catch my breath, it's time to think about what to do next.
I'd like to get a "complete" DecoderPro version out by early July, but I'm not certain what should be considered the most important things to put in it. I've got a long list of little updates, fixes and cleanups to include, and I'll probably get to most of them. Big features are a little more problematic, as I don't often have the large chunks of time they require. I've already promised to add Lenz XpressNet support to JMRI and DecoderPro, and C/MRI support to JMRI itself. So those will be happening. I've got some other stuff I'm playing with on the layout-control side of the house, and I'll probably keep doing that too. But beyond those, I'd like to see what people think are most important. What would you most like to see? Some of the items that have been suggested include: a) Ops mode programming b) Better programming GUI, for example making it possible to have some variables control whether others display, etc. Break some parts (roster pane, function mapping) into smaller parts so you could create a programmer that walks you through one item at a time (e.g. a "step 1" pane that handles the address, then a "step 2" pane that saves the file, then a "step 3" pane that sets momentum, etc) c) Much smarter speed-table support, with various tools for smoothing curves, resetting the curve to a standard one, adjusting it to the contents of Vstart/VMid/VEnd, etc d) Improvements to the roster - being able to copy & delete locomotives, better editing, import/export to various common formats, etc. e) Fix the long-standing problem with many PCs not being able to connect at the MS100 baud rate. (This is a LocoNet-only problem, and I'll need help from somebody who speaks windows) f) Integrated installers, esp. for Windows. The current multi-step install process is getting in the way. It would be pretty simple to create a two-step install process of the form "Run this Java installer, then run this DecoderPro installer", perhaps with an updater that makes future updates quicker downloads. g) Lots more decoders h) Add a progress bar when programming. This is not trivial, unfortunately, because the program doesn't really have any idea how long the programming will take, or even how many CVs are left to do. It would take a little effort to get that right-enough to be useful (nobody likes a progress bar that gets shorter, then longer, then shorter) i) Get the "confirm" button working. This is really only faster on LocoNet command stations right now, as all others need to do a complete read to implement it. But it's still a useful thing to have when working with problematic decoders, e.g. you wonder whether the decoder's been changed, etc. j) Make the programmer GUI more bullet-proof. Now, if you type letters in a decimal field, enter a too-large or negative number, etc, Bad Stuff happens. It would be good if that were more robust. What do people think? Bob -- -------------- Bob Jacobsen (Bob_Jacobsen@..., 510-486-7355, fax 510-495-2957) |
Locked
Re: What next for DecoderPro?
Jon Miller
Bob,
You could copy your multi-page fine printed list* here and let us chose, say, five items. Then do the higher percentages! Short of that my choices, of those listed, are; a. (I don't use this but a lot of people do. f. (It might get us more Windows users) d. (At least just the delete key, for mistakes) g. (Users always want "their" decoder) thoughts, and I have no idea how easy this would be. j. -enter a too-large or negative number- Just add text "8 digit number only" This would tend to indicate if you did something different bad things would happen. e. I would have put this above as I think it's one of the upper priority items but without a Windows person it's hard to do. It would pick up more Digitrax people though! xx items. Sometimes just text on the panes would help but the real problem is exactly what text and where. * this is real, I've seen it <G>. Jon Miller AT&SF For me time has stopped in 1941 Digitrax DCC owner, Chief system NMRA Life member #2623 Member SFRH&MS |
Locked
Re: What next for DecoderPro?
Mike Davison
On Tuesday 14 May 2002 09:12 am, Bob Jacobsen wrote:
a) Ops mode programmingGood. d) Improvements to the roster - being able to copy & deleteIt would be nice to have a simple way to copy the programming of one decoder into anther. I have 2 GP9s and would like them to both have the same characteristics. It would be nice to be able to 'inherit' a roster entry when a new decoder/loco is added to the roster. For example, loco #123 exists and loco 456 has the same decoder. It would be nice if the configuration from loco 123 could be copied to loco 456 as a starting point. f) Integrated installers, esp. for Windows. The current multi-stepAnd perhaps: add a bin directory where all the scripts live and place jmri.jar in the lib directory. For a Linux install, one could then simply place DecoderPro in /usr/local/DecoderPro and create a symlink from /usr/local/bin/dp -> /usr/local/DecoderPro/bin/DecoderPro.csh (or something like that). Other platforms may have similar conventions to follow. g) Lots more decodersAn Internet decoder registration tool built into DecoderPro. This would be similar to the various CD players where if the CD player does not recognize the CD (based on number of songs and length of each song) it queries the DB on some Web server. If the unknown CD (decoder) is in the DB then DecoderPro can update itself and the user can then use that definition. (you no longer have to spin a new version of DecoderPro when new decoder files become available). If the CD is not in the DB, the DB server also provides a way for a user to enter the CD information and upload it to that central DB (presumably someone checks the upload). cheers, Mike |
Locked
Re: What next for DecoderPro?
Jon Miller
It would be nice to have a simple way to copy the programming of onedecoder into anther. I have 2 GP9s and would like them to both have the same characteristics.< We played around with this some at the clinic and not sure what happened. I think this. 1) You can open a file for the existing loco, say #1234. 2) You can then change the loco number, to #5678 and program all. Then save. I think this works but we didn't spend much time with it and without the ability to delete files (it's hard by hand) we (I) didn't experiment much! Lots more decoders<Of course the really best would be convince manufactures that DecoderPro is the (only) way to go and they would create the files. Jon Miller AT&SF For me time has stopped in 1941 Digitrax DCC owner, Chief system NMRA Life member #2623 Member SFRH&MS |
Locked
Re: What next for DecoderPro?
Mike Davison
On Tuesday 14 May 2002 10:22 am, Jon Miller wrote:
Did this replace the file for 1234?It would be nice to have a simple way to copy the programming of onedecoder into anther. I have 2 GP9s and would like them to both have the same Perhaps if 'we' created a standard XML format (schema?) to describe decodersLots more decoders<Of course the really best would be convince manufactures that DecoderPro and created a central Internet-accessible DB of those XML definitions we could get more buy in. A common format would allow the central DB to be used by all decoder programming tools and would allow decoder manufacturers to produce a single description file. Mike |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss