开云体育

FRED, The cellular companies years ago convinced the FCC and the Federal Government to make the privacy act law. Unfortunatley you are correct. If you build your "homebrew" and it can receive

Thanks Clint, s1moller, and Fred for your feedback. Fred, I haven't ordered the RT software yet. I wanted to see how satisfied the current users are. I realize that, with the FT-60 being newly

The activity (listening to cellular conversations) prohibited by the statute is a "crime of specific intent". That is, you must intend to tune and listen to the conversation; not just

Patrick, It has always been my understanding that it is illegal to reveal what you monitor to a third party. But are you telling me, that if I was an experimenter, and I built a homebrew radio that

Remember that there are still a lot of analog cell towers in use, and even more cell phones that still have analog capabilities. Therefore you are still able to hear those people that are using the

FYI, I guess the law needs to be changed at some point in time! That will happen when the receivers will be able to detect digital LOL Until then Happy monitoring! Larry ke2qr@...

Larry, Good point about the phones being digital - so you have to wonder why they are cellular (frequency) blocked! That's legislation for you. 73 de KE2QR Fred Jacobowitz _._. _ _ ._

Hello All, Just an FYI, Most ALL cell phone systems today are digital in nature so monitoring with a conventional radio will not work so I would not even be concerned about this any longer. Most

ECPA (Electronics Communications Privacy Act) and some legislation that followed a few years later makes it illegal to monitor cell phone conversations. 73 Eddie Muro- Amateur Radio Station

FRED, The legal issues are very real. It is in violation of the Federal wireless privacy act to intercept (receive) any cellular transmissions analog or digital signals, period. It is also against the

Mark, I have you received the RT software yet? I am waiting for the final release as I participated in the beta. I also have a FT-7800r and use the RT software with that. So I thought it would be

This link may be of interest - old, but a start. Anyone know the current law? http://www.grove-ent.com/LLawbook.html Bob G4HFQ

ADMS-1J is working fine for me. I have programmed about 300 channels into modified and non-modified units with no problems. I believe Jim's product is still "growing" - there were a couple

Ah, so for the techno savy out there, lets take a break from putting down this radio and lets come up with a strategy for plugging the hole! What are the legal issues concerning monitoring the cell

Used the software for first time to transfer some memories to a new ft60. Memories transferred ok, but when I switched to VFO and manually entered a repeater frequency, the shift frequency was not

VX-150? Absolutely. Among other Yaesu HTs, too. Clint Bradford

Isn't that where cellular images are? Clint Bradford

Greetings, Seeking feedback/comments from any FT-60 users who have purchased and are using RT Systems' ADMS-1J software for the FT-60. How does it fare in a comparison with FT-60

For what it's worth, I have the vx150, ft60R and the VX2R, the ear-bud microphone that I bought for the VX2r, model MH37, works fine with the vx150 and FT60. I'm guessing, but I'd think the speaker

Ed, A young ham came to the last meeting with a vx-5 and the speaker mic. I should have grabbed it and tried it. He likes it because he said the speaker on the vx-5 is small and this gave him plenty