开云体育

Peter, I’m not done yet However, I did not receive an answer regarding the adaptation between NJM2073 and TDA2030. It worked by connecting? (via flag inputamplier on a test model). It’s a bit

Glad you like it. It is not my design alone. It is a community driven circuit. Very little of it is original work! I am less of an author and more of an editor who picks and chooses interesting things

Ashar, yes ,i believe it was jack purdum i was responding to with a general answer. I personally want to thank you for your dedicated hard work for the ubitx. I use mine everyday. Ive changed the

While you are at it, replace the audio preamp with the one designed by Wes. It is on his site www.w7zoi.net wrote:

Hi Gerard, This looks interesting are you sharing the pcb files on github at all ? Br Peter.

Hi, Like Farhan I do not see those screens as an improvement. I am happy enough with my V3. I made some changes to get it compliant regarding harmonics and other spurii, tamed the sidetone, and such

Thomas and Farhan, If color were the only addition to the stock display, then I would agree with Farhan that it is not much value-added.? The display on the v6 also adds more screen real estate AND a

Sorry to disagree with you on color screens. For me, color greatly improves the ease-of-use, such as separating functions and commands from data. ?Color screens are a feature, not a disadvantage.

David, I am not sure which mail of Jack (Purdim, I presume?) you are referring to. uBitx was the answer to a multiband rig for less than 100 dollars when scratch built, that was was easy to tune and

JAck, i fully agree with you. I bought my v6.1? and am very happy with it. with my budget, 1200 is almost my income. Even though its tight i buy qrp ft8 rigs, build qrp cw rigs,etc. been a qrper

Last month I spent 3 weeks at our cabin in OK.? I only needed to drive about 1/4 mile up the road to be within the borders of the Ouachita National Forest so I decided it was time to activate a

Interesting.? I guess that saves redoing the PCB trace layout... 73, Justin B. KI5GKD

Arnie (and others who don't understand why), It was designed that way so the back of the display would not short out against any of the metal on the NANO. It used to be on the front, but people had

While rummaging around in my storage I found a Ver3 UBITX Kit in the original box. I remember testing this board previously and the Raduino with my working UBITX and found it operating. The only thing

THanks Justin. I usually have seen Nano's with the pins mounted from the bottom of the board. The nano that came with the ubitx v6 had the pins mounted on the opposite side of the board, which makes

Arnie, Glad you got it sorted!? So, you put in a different Nano that had the headers soldered onto the "correct" side?? Been there, done that!? Enjoy your new display... 73, Justin B. KI5GKD

Just finished watching this. Great presentation of practical radio knowledge for experimenters and builders. I really liked the practical test and measurement techniques that were done with minimal

Hello: I red a previous message where an individual used a PC board attached to the back side of a Nection display. It suppose to have got rid of the display noise that was making it back in to the

Bem-vindo Sasi Bhushan. Desejo a você todo o sucesso e tenho certeza que sua habilidade e conhecimento ir?o agregar muito ao grupo trazendo crescimento e satisfa??o a todos os integrantes.

Well deserved rest! Thanks, Gordon Gibby KX4Z