Locked
Re: possible bug, loconet slot monitor
Nigel:? My understanding is that Zephyr (DCS51 for me) releases a loco - ie stops all communications with it - when another loco is selected on its keypad. In fact I rely on that behaviour. Release
By
Jan Carr
·
#153878
·
|
Locked
Re: Dispatcher - SML - auto-allocation problem
Hi Mitchell Signal S04 does not like being red. Somewhere there is some logix that is resetting it to caution if its danger or proceed.? Steve G
By
Steve_G
·
#153877
·
|
Locked
Re: Setting a sensor as indicator only in Layout Editor
Hi Paul, In Layout Editor, add the sensor as a Sensor Icon. Right click on it and set as disabled, this will prevent the panel changing the sensor status. They will then display purely as indicators,
By
Steve Young
·
#153876
·
|
Locked
Re: Logix Change Doesn't Always Trigger Signal Head Change
Problem Solved: Faulty logic in the logix may allow multiple ¡°true¡± conditionals to occur simultaneously before the error appears on the signal head.? When the second conditional becomes
By
C Confair
·
#153875
·
|
Locked
Setting a sensor as indicator only in Layout Editor
I am building my first glass panel and am getting on quite well with the Layout Editor learning curve. I am stuck on making indicator only lights on the panel.? It seems the "lights" feature is not
By
Paul Townsend
·
#153874
·
|
Locked
Re: 4.12 JMRI Web Server Crash on Startup
Hi Pierre, Eclipse???? Did you build your own JMRI from scratch at one time? And not clean out before going on to use and modify it? I can't think of anything that could possibly want to reference
By
whmvd
·
#153873
·
|
Locked
Re: Cabooses
Jamie, Another solution is to create a new type of caboose, say Caboose-P.? Change all of the cabooses that you want the train to service to Caboose-P and only allow that type to be serviced by the
By
Dan Boudreau
·
#153872
·
|
Locked
Re: Cabooses
Hi Jamie, Until Dan gets around to updating the software there is a work-around. I remember some western roads put a P on their cabeese to indicate they were in pool service. You could create a new
By
Dennis Drury
·
#153871
·
|
Locked
Cabooses
I use the Operations feature to handle switching on my small layout and I like it a lot. When setting up trains, it is easy to require a caboose and, if desired, a specific road name. I deal with pool
By
Jamie Robinson
·
#153870
·
|
Locked
Engine Driver and JMRI 4.13.5 fail when attempting to steal an engine
Using?Engine Driver connected through JMRI ver 4.13.5, when I attempt to acquire an engine that is "In Use" on a Digitrax throttle I see a "steal" message on my phone with Y or N options.? When I
By
Frank Fezzie
·
#153869
·
|
Locked
Re: 4.12 JMRI Web Server Crash on Startup
Hi Pierre, The most likely problem is that you didn't clear out the JMRI folder before untarring the new version. There are some .jar files, particularly in the web area, that have a version in the
By
Steve Todd
·
#153868
·
|
Locked
Re: Configuring the "retun when empty" fields in OpsPro
Dan, Thanks. I had not considered the need to do routing with custom loads. I do have some situations where two trains are involved to move a car from point A to B. I will need to decide how to handle
By
Paul Davidson
·
#153867
·
|
Locked
4.12 JMRI Web Server Crash on Startup
Hello all. Running JMRI 4.12 on an RPI-2 with SPROG, Standalone Locobuffer and BDL-168. User since 2.? After botching the update to 4.12 from 4.8 and seemingly correcting that.. Web Server crashes
By
Rockpro
·
#153866
·
|
Locked
Re: Configuring the "retun when empty" fields in OpsPro
Paul, Also note that if you created a new car type, without custom loads or assigned destinations via a schedule, that those cars would not be routed.? You need to use routing when two or more trains
By
Dan Boudreau
·
#153865
·
|
Locked
Re: Configuring the "retun when empty" fields in OpsPro
Paul, Note that the RWE is designed for a type "empty" load.? So your spur / schedule would ship out a "Loaded" cars and once the car(s) arrived at a spur or staging, the program would remove the
By
Dan Boudreau
·
#153864
·
|
Locked
Re: 4.8 TO 4.12 Losing turnout control and my mind
As others have pointed put, if you are not an expert on JMRI directory structure, don't try to interfere with the directory structure before/during/after a JMRI install or update. My rule has always
By
Dave Heap
·
#153863
·
|
Locked
Re: 4.8 TO 4.12 Losing turnout control and my mind
Hello Bob. Well. switching tracks was literally that.. I tried to throw a turnout so the loco would change physical tracks. Clearly.. I broke some stuff... I since reverted back to 4.8. Everything ran
By
Rockpro
·
#153862
·
|
Locked
Re: Extra slow panel file loading
Very impressive group of components! IIRC, when JMRI is connected to OpenLCB CAN, each new Sensor or Turnout will cause a few (3-4) messages on the wire. Each new OpenLCB-connected signal is probably
By
Bob Jacobsen
·
#153861
·
|
Locked
Re: 4.8 TO 4.12 Losing turnout control and my mind
What does that last part mean? "switch tracks to the main line¡± Something broke when you did the ¡°switch tracks¡± thing, clearly. So we need to understand what was changed. Be careful of randomly
By
Bob Jacobsen
·
#153860
·
|
Locked
Re: Configuring the "retun when empty" fields in OpsPro
Dan & Dennis, Your answers helped me understand and also consider several options. I have been playing around with it and I think I prefer to work with schedules and RWE features do drive the behavior
By
Paul Davidson
·
#153859
·
|