Re: VARA Speeds IN and OUT of BPQ32 RMS
The licence check is applied to the calling station. Does the
calling station have a licence?
73,
John
On 10/07/2022 06:56, Bob AF9W wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I am running a fully licensed VARA FM.? The license is for AF9W.
The RMS call is AF9W-10.? The VARA FM says it is running Wide all
the time except when someone connects using Narrow mode.? I am
going to try this tomorrow with RMS Packet and Winlink P2P to see
what happens.??
|
Re: VARA Speeds IN and OUT of BPQ32 RMS
I am running a fully licensed VARA FM.? The license is for AF9W. The RMS call is AF9W-10.? The VARA FM says it is running Wide all the time except when someone connects using Narrow mode.? I am going to try this tomorrow with RMS Packet and Winlink P2P to see what happens.??
|
Re: VARA Speeds IN and OUT of BPQ32 RMS
That might suggest it in running unlicenced. Are you sure you are
using the call that is registered?
With VARA HF you get a message in the status window showing if it is
registered but I'm not sure if VARA FM does the same.
73,
John
On 09/07/2022 20:33, Bob AF9W wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
We have been doing some testing with VARA FM.? One station is
running Winlink Express with VARA Wide on Windows 10.? I have a
BPQ32 6.0.23.1 running on Windows 10 with VARA FM 4.2.3.??
When we send a message with an 18K attachment to a CMS through my
RMS, we get speeds of 21000 bps.? If we receive the same message
with attachment through the RMS it never goes faster than Level 1,
i.e., 586bps.??
Both stations are running licensed VARA FM Wide with DRA-50 modems
properly tuned.??
Any ideas why the difference between sending and receiving.?
Here is the VARA section of my bpq32.cfg
;** Port 6 VARA ***
PORT
?PORTNUM=6
?ID=VARA
?DRIVER=VARA
?CONFIG
?ADDR 127.0.0.1 8300 PTT CM108 PATH C:\VARA FM\VARAFM.EXE
?FM9600
WL2KREPORT
PUBLIC,server.winlink.org,8085,AF9W-10,CN97dl,00-23,145560000,VARAFM96,20,20,3,0
; Report to WinLink
?****
ENDPORT
|
Re: VARA Speeds IN and OUT of BPQ32 RMS
Isn’t FM9600 is setting a maximum speed limit in this config? It may be a suspect. I’d remove it and see if it makes a difference.
|
Re: direwolf, signalink, and bpq32 on linux
BBS forwarding and lengthy node lists are frowned upon.
Complete details at: www.Network105.org?
Prof. Chris Lance www.ww2bsa.org www.EastNetPacket.com www.Network105.org Radio Station Manager Mount Allamuchy Scout Reservation ARRL Life Member
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-------- Original message -------- From: Christopher Molnar <cmolnar65@...> Date: 7/9/22 7:13 AM (GMT-05:00) Subject: Re: [bpq32] direwolf, signalink, and bpq32 on linux
Thanks Chris!
?
I may be confused (take it easy on packet nebie here), but I read someplace in that groups rules that packet BBS’s are not supposed to be on that net? Or is it just BBS to BBS communications that are not supposed to be on that band?
-Chris
KO4YAW
?
?
My 2 cents: Lots of HF packet on Network105 Group? 14.105 LSB
Mount Allamuchy Scout Reservation
-------- Original message --------
From: Christopher Molnar <cmolnar65@...>
Date: 7/8/22 9:21 PM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: Re: [bpq32] direwolf, signalink, and bpq32 on linux
Hi Joshua,
?
One more question if you have time.
?
What frequency do you normally run on HF? I see two in your ID line:
14.105/7.104
?
Which one do you normally find the most activity on? I am in FL and propagation is not all that great on a good day, I think the heat kills me.
?
Thanks,
-Chris
?
Oh, and I left out my PTT config line from the instructions because from what I understand, the Signalink uses VOX.? If I'm wrong, we can discuss that.
|
VARA Speeds IN and OUT of BPQ32 RMS
We have been doing some testing with VARA FM.? One station is running Winlink Express with VARA Wide on Windows 10.? I have a BPQ32 6.0.23.1 running on Windows 10 with VARA FM 4.2.3.?? When we send a message with an 18K attachment to a CMS through my RMS, we get speeds of 21000 bps.? If we receive the same message with attachment through the RMS it never goes faster than Level 1, i.e., 586bps.?? Both stations are running licensed VARA FM Wide with DRA-50 modems properly tuned.?? Any ideas why the difference between sending and receiving.? Here is the VARA section of my bpq32.cfg
;** Port 6 VARA ***
PORT
?PORTNUM=6
?ID=VARA
?DRIVER=VARA
?CONFIG
?ADDR 127.0.0.1 8300 PTT CM108 PATH C:\VARA FM\VARAFM.EXE
?FM9600
WL2KREPORT PUBLIC,server.winlink.org,8085,AF9W-10,CN97dl,00-23,145560000,VARAFM96,20,20,3,0 ; Report to WinLink
?****
ENDPORT
|
Re: direwolf, signalink, and bpq32 on linux
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 07:21 PM, Christopher Molnar wrote:
What frequency do you normally run on HF? I see two in your ID line: 14.105/7.104
I run on 20m during the day and 40m at night. Just trying to follow propagation. Lots of us swap our nodes between those two frequencies. BBS is fine on those frequencies, that's most of what you will see. NODES broadcasts are not welcome,? APRS and forwarding are generally frowned upon.? The dial frequencies are 14.105 LSB and 7.104 LSB. If you use a filter (I use 350Hz), you need to shift your bandpass filter up to center on 1700Hz tones (down in RF.) For mt 991A, I just dial in +200 shift.? When you start Direwolf,? it's good to enable forward error correction. In the terminal you can type "direwolf -X 1".
|
Re: Messages not being marked "PF" after forwarding completes
Lee,
Here's what I have at about the same time.
Ken, W9GM
220709 16:45:26 |K5DAT-1?? Incoming Connect from K5DAT
220709 16:45:26 >K5DAT-1?? [BPQ-6.0.23.1-B1FWIHJM$]
220709 16:45:26 >K5DAT-1? ?
220709 16:45:26 >K5DAT-1?? de W9GM>
220709 16:45:28 <K5DAT-1?? [BPQ-6.0.23.3-B1FIHJM$]
220709 16:45:28 <K5DAT-1?? FA P K5DAT W9GM.#SWWI.WI.USA.NA W9GM
49788_K5DAT 2029
220709 16:45:28 <K5DAT-1?? F> E5
220709 16:45:28 >K5DAT-1?? FS +
220709 16:45:31 |K5DAT-1?? Uncompressing Message Comp Len 1220 Msg
Len 2031 CRC 277a
220709 16:45:31 ?K5DAT-1?? Msg 1956 Routing Trace To W9GM Via
W9GM.#SWWI.WI.USA.NA
220709 16:45:31 ?K5DAT-1?? Routing Trace Type P TO W9GM VIA
W9GM.#SWWI.WI.USA.NA Route On WW NA USA WI #SWWI
220709 16:45:31 ?K5DAT-1?? Routing Trace TO W9GM Matches BBS W9GM
220709 16:45:31 ?K5DAT-1?? Message matches this BBS and ForwardToMe
not set - not queuing message
220709 16:45:31 ?K5DAT-1?? Routing Trace W9GM Matches implied AT
W9GM
220709 16:45:31 ?K5DAT-1?? Message matches this BBS and ForwardToMe
not set - not queuing message
220709 16:45:31 >K5DAT-1?? FF
220709 16:45:32 <K5DAT-1?? FQ
220709 16:45:33 |K5DAT-1?? K5DAT-1 Disconnected
On 7/9/2022 12:05 PM, Lee Bengston
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hello,
I have an issue with one remote BBS where after completion
of forwarding, the message doesn't get labeled "PF" in my BBS
- remains "PN".? This has been happening through multiple
versions of BPQ - upgrades on either side do not fix it.?
Fortunately the message does not remain queued, so there are
no more attempts to forward it after it has been forwarded
once.? Therefore it appears to be a superficial labeling
issue.
The BBS log for a recent forward is shown below. This is
happening only with the W9GM-1 BBS. It's not a big deal, but
it would be nice to get to the bottom of it.
220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT
? ? Msg 49788 Routing Trace To W9GM Via W9GM.#
220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT ? ? Routing Trace Type P TO W9GM VIA
W9GM.#
Route On WW NA USA WI #SWWI
220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT ? ? Routing Trace TO W9GM Matches BBS
W9GM
220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT ? ? Routing Trace W9GM Matches
implied AT W9GM
220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT ? ? Routing Trace W9GM Matches AT
WG0A
220709 16:45:25 |W9GM ? ? ?Connecting to BBS W9GM
220709 16:45:26 <W9GM ? ? ?*** CONNECTED
220709 16:45:26 >W9GM ? ? ?IDLETIME 60
220709 16:45:26 <W9GM ? ? ?DATNOD:K5DAT-7} IDLETIME - 60
220709 16:45:26 >W9GM ? ? ?c 3 w9gm-7
220709 16:45:26 <W9GM ? ? ?DATNOD:K5DAT-7} Connected to
GMNOD:W9GM-7
220709 16:45:26 >W9GM ? ? ?bbs
220709 16:45:27 <W9GM ? ? ?GMNOD:W9GM-7} Connected to BBS
220709 16:45:28 <W9GM ? ? ?[BPQ-6.0.23.1-B1FWIHJM$]
220709 16:45:28 <W9GM ? ? ?de W9GM>
220709 16:45:28 >W9GM ? ? ?[BPQ-6.0.23.3-B1FIHJM$]
220709 16:45:28 >W9GM ? ? ?FA P K5DAT W9GM.#
W9GM 49788_K5DAT 2029
220709 16:45:28 >W9GM ? ? ?F> E5
220709 16:45:29 <W9GM ? ? ?FS +
220709 16:45:29 | ? ? ? ? ?Compressed Message Comp Len 1220
Msg Len 2031 CRC 277a
220709 16:45:33 <W9GM ? ? ?FF
220709 16:45:33 >W9GM ? ? ?FQ
220709 16:45:34 |W9GM ? ? ?W9GM Disconnected
73,
Lee K5DAT
|
Re: BBS connecting to AWS what have I messed up?
Mystery solved. For those that look at this in the future my app lines are now:
?
APPLICATION 1,BBS,,KO4YAW-1,YAWBBS,255
APPLICATION 2,CHAT,,KO4YAW-4,YAWCHT,255
APPLICATION 3,RMS,C 1 CMS,KO4YAW-10,YAWRMS,255
?
?
My app lines:
APPLICATION 1,RMS,C 1 CMS,KO4YAW-10,,0
APPLICATION 1,BBS,,KO4YAW-1,,0
APPLICATION 2,CHAT,,KO4YAW-4,,0
?
?
The problem is probably your APPLICATION lines. What do you have?
73,
John
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 09/07/2022 17:04, Christopher Molnar wrote:
Hello All!
?
I am making progress…. Things are talking together. But, something isn’t working right.
?
When I log in via telnet or from the telnet window on the browser and type “BBS” on the command line I am being taken to Amazon instead of the internal BBS.
?
What have I messed up?
?
Thanks!
-Chris
KO4YAW
?
?
?
|
Re: BBS connecting to AWS what have I messed up?
My app lines:
APPLICATION 1,RMS,C 1 CMS,KO4YAW-10,,0
APPLICATION 1,BBS,,KO4YAW-1,,0
APPLICATION 2,CHAT,,KO4YAW-4,,0
?
?
The problem is probably your APPLICATION lines. What do you have?
73,
John
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 09/07/2022 17:04, Christopher Molnar wrote:
Hello All!
?
I am making progress…. Things are talking together. But, something isn’t working right.
?
When I log in via telnet or from the telnet window on the browser and type “BBS” on the command line I am being taken to Amazon instead of the internal BBS.
?
What have I messed up?
?
Thanks!
-Chris
KO4YAW
?
?
?
|
Re: BBS connecting to AWS what have I messed up?
The problem is probably your APPLICATION lines. What do you have?
73,
John
On 09/07/2022 17:04, Christopher Molnar
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hello All!
?
I am making
progress…. Things are talking together. But, something isn’t
working right.
?
When I log
in via telnet or from the telnet window on the browser and
type “BBS” on the command line I am being taken to Amazon
instead of the internal BBS.
?
What have I
messed up?
?
Thanks!
-Chris
KO4YAW
?
?
|
Re: WinRPR + ic7100 to rigctld PTT
KISS ports don't support a RIGCONTROL section.
I find it easier to let bpq control the radio, as this simplifies
sharing a radio with several modems. I run WinRPR and QtSM, and
sometimes VARA and/or ARDOP.
My winrpr config is:
?
[PROGRAM]
; WATERFALL 0 = COLORED, 1 = BW "inverted", 2 = BW "normal"
WATERFALL:0
; FOOTPRINT OF WinRPR: 0=normal, 1=small
SMALLSIZE:0
[END]
[PTT]
; PTT COM number
PTTPORT:54
; Set to 1 if DTR should be used instead of RTS
USEDTR:0
[END]
;[COMOUT]
; Set it to a COM port generated by com0com tool
;COMOUTPORT:3
;[END]
[TCP]
TCPPORT:8505
[END]
[TNC]
; # is used as ESC character
#s 0
; set mycall!!!
#i GM8BPQ
; set transmit level!!!
#%xr 400
#%B R300
#%F 2000
; activate KISS, if required
;#@K
[END]
[AUDIO]
RX:1
TX:5
[END]
As you can see, I'm using DED Host mode instead of KISS, and a TCP
connection. My com0com port pair are com54/55.
The relevant bits of my bpq32.cfg are
RADIO 2
?? ?COM7 19200 ICOM IC7100 88 PTT_SETS_INPUT PTTMUX COM55
HAMLIB=4532
****
This is using the new format, with a separate RADIO section instead
of RIGCONTROL in a PORT definition. I find this clearer when the
same config applies to more than one port, but you could put the
same line in RIGCONTROL in your WinRPR port if you prefer.
PTTMUX COM55 tells rigcontol to look for RTS changes on COM55
(linked to COM54 used by WinRPR) and convert to CI-V PTT commands.
HAMLIB=4532 tells rigcontrol to emulate rigctld, an is used to key
QtSM on the same radio.
PTT_SETS_INPUT is only needed if you have a hardware tnc connected
to the acc port of the 7100 as well as soundcard TNCs
PORT
?ID=WinRPR New
?TYPE=EXTERNAL
?COMPORT=4
?SPEED=38400
?DRIVER=WinRPR
?PACLEN=80
?INTERLOCK=2
?;PORTCALL=GM8BPQ-10
?
CONFIG
?ADDR 127.0.0.1 8505
? DEFAULT ROBUST??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ; Default mode is RP
? USEAPPLCALLS??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ; Accept connects to all
APPLCALLS
? BEACONAFTERSESSION
? %F 2000??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ; Centre Freq for Normal Packet
(Default is 1500)
? @D 0??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ; Full Dup
? %B R300
? T 50??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ; TXD
?; %XA 40??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ; AFSK Level
?; %XF 1500??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ; 9600 Level
? N 5
? DEBUGLOG 0
?
ENDPORT
73,
John
On 09/07/2022 15:07, Kayne Kruse -
N9SEO wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi,
I am experimenting with WinRPR and bpq.?? I think that I somehow
got the rigcontrol messed up.? BPQ is wintel rev 6.0.23.1 June
2022.
PTT works fine with QTSM and hamlib here so the server
(rigctld.exe) is running fine.? However the following port config
does not key the radio, so maybe someone has some insight as to
what I have wrong.? Rig is an IC-7100, Serial ports are managed
with Com0com and win4icom suite.?? So I could assign another
comport pair and use the icom CI-V but for now hamlib was the
shortest path on everything else modem wise here.
PORT
? PORTNUM=4
? ID=20m RPR test
? TYPE=ASYNC
? PROTOCOL=KISS
? IPADDR=127.0.0.1
? TCPPORT=8201
? KISSOPTIONS=NOPARAMS
? CHANNEL=A
? QUALITY=0
? MINQUAL=0
? FRACK=6000
? RESPTIME=1500
? RETRIES=10
? MAXFRAME=1
? PACLEN=60
? UNPROTO=ID
? BCALL=N9SEO
? L3ONLY=0
? DIGIFLAG=0
? DIGIPORT=0
? USERS=3
? CONFIG
RIGCONTROL
?HAMLIB 127.0.0.1:4532
****
ENDPORT
WinRPR config
[PROGRAM]
; WATERFALL 0 = COLORED, 1 = BW "inverted", 2 = BW "normal"
WATERFALL:0
; FOOTPRINT OF WinRPR: 0=normal, 1=small
SMALLSIZE:0
[END]
[AUDIO]
; Audio Device Number, starting at 1
RX:1
TX:1
[END]
[PTT]
; PTT COM number
PTTPORT:0
; Set to 1 if DTR should be used instead of RTS
USEDTR:0
[END]
[COMOUT]
; Set it to a COM port generated by com0com tool
COMOUTPORT:0
[END]
[TCP]
TCPPORT:8201
[END]
[TNC]
; # is used as ESC character
#s 0
; set mycall!!!
#i N9SEO-15
; set transmit level!!!
#%xr 400
#%D0 ; Only use Robust Packet
#S 1 ; Set channel to 1
#R 0 ; Digi off
#F 6 ; Frack 6 seconds
#N 10 ; Retries 10
#O 1 ; Maxframe 1
#P 16 ; Persist 16
#T 10 ; TX delay 100mS
#W 30 ; Slottime 30
#@T2 150 ; Resptime 1.5 seconds
#@T3 18000 ; T3
#%B R600 ; R600 used for UI
; activate KISS, if required
#@K
[END]
Thanks in advance for your time and comments.
73 Kayne
N9SEO
|
Messages not being marked "PF" after forwarding completes
Hello,
I have an issue with one remote BBS where after completion of forwarding, the message doesn't get labeled "PF" in my BBS - remains "PN".? This has been happening through multiple versions of BPQ - upgrades on either side do not fix it.? Fortunately the message does not remain queued, so there are no more attempts to forward it after it has been forwarded once.? Therefore it appears to be a superficial labeling issue.
The BBS log for a recent forward is shown below. This is happening only with the W9GM-1 BBS. It's not a big deal, but it would be nice to get to the bottom of it.
220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT ? ? Msg 49788 Routing Trace To W9GM Via W9GM.#
220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT ? ? Routing Trace Type P TO W9GM VIA W9GM.# Route On WW NA USA WI #SWWI
220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT ? ? Routing Trace TO W9GM Matches BBS W9GM
220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT ? ? Routing Trace W9GM Matches implied AT W9GM
220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT ? ? Routing Trace W9GM Matches AT WG0A
220709 16:45:25 |W9GM ? ? ?Connecting to BBS W9GM
220709 16:45:26 <W9GM ? ? ?*** CONNECTED
220709 16:45:26 >W9GM ? ? ?IDLETIME 60
220709 16:45:26 <W9GM ? ? ?DATNOD:K5DAT-7} IDLETIME - 60
220709 16:45:26 >W9GM ? ? ?c 3 w9gm-7
220709 16:45:26 <W9GM ? ? ?DATNOD:K5DAT-7} Connected to GMNOD:W9GM-7
220709 16:45:26 >W9GM ? ? ?bbs
220709 16:45:27 <W9GM ? ? ?GMNOD:W9GM-7} Connected to BBS
220709 16:45:28 <W9GM ? ? ?[BPQ-6.0.23.1-B1FWIHJM$]
220709 16:45:28 <W9GM ? ? ?de W9GM>
220709 16:45:28 >W9GM ? ? ?[BPQ-6.0.23.3-B1FIHJM$]
220709 16:45:28 >W9GM ? ? ?FA P K5DAT W9GM.# W9GM 49788_K5DAT 2029
220709 16:45:28 >W9GM ? ? ?F> E5
220709 16:45:29 <W9GM ? ? ?FS +
220709 16:45:29 | ? ? ? ? ?Compressed Message Comp Len 1220 Msg Len 2031 CRC 277a
220709 16:45:33 <W9GM ? ? ?FF
220709 16:45:33 >W9GM ? ? ?FQ
220709 16:45:34 |W9GM ? ? ?W9GM Disconnected
73, Lee K5DAT
|
Re: WinRPR + ic7100 to rigctld PTT
|
Re: BBS connecting to AWS what have I messed up?
Forgot to add the screen print 
|
BBS connecting to AWS what have I messed up?
Hello All!
?
I am making progress…. Things are talking together. But, something isn’t working right.
?
When I log in via telnet or from the telnet window on the browser and type “BBS” on the command line I am being taken to Amazon instead of the internal BBS.
?
What have I messed up?
?
Thanks!
-Chris
KO4YAW
?
?
|
WinRPR + ic7100 to rigctld PTT
Hi, I am experimenting with WinRPR and bpq.?? I think that I somehow got the rigcontrol messed up.? BPQ is wintel rev 6.0.23.1 June 2022. PTT works fine with QTSM and hamlib here so the server (rigctld.exe) is running fine.? However the following port config does not key the radio, so maybe someone has some insight as to what I have wrong.? Rig is an IC-7100, Serial ports are managed with Com0com and win4icom suite.?? So I could assign another comport pair and use the icom CI-V but for now hamlib was the shortest path on everything else modem wise here.
PORT
? PORTNUM=4
? ID=20m RPR test
? TYPE=ASYNC
? PROTOCOL=KISS
? IPADDR=127.0.0.1
? TCPPORT=8201
? KISSOPTIONS=NOPARAMS
? CHANNEL=A
? QUALITY=0
? MINQUAL=0
? FRACK=6000
? RESPTIME=1500
? RETRIES=10
? MAXFRAME=1
? PACLEN=60
? UNPROTO=ID
? BCALL=N9SEO
? L3ONLY=0
? DIGIFLAG=0
? DIGIPORT=0
? USERS=3
? CONFIG
RIGCONTROL
?HAMLIB 127.0.0.1:4532
****
ENDPORT
WinRPR config
[PROGRAM]
; WATERFALL 0 = COLORED, 1 = BW "inverted", 2 = BW "normal"
WATERFALL:0
; FOOTPRINT OF WinRPR: 0=normal, 1=small
SMALLSIZE:0
[END]
[AUDIO]
; Audio Device Number, starting at 1
RX:1
TX:1
[END]
[PTT]
; PTT COM number
PTTPORT:0
; Set to 1 if DTR should be used instead of RTS
USEDTR:0
[END]
[COMOUT]
; Set it to a COM port generated by com0com tool
COMOUTPORT:0
[END]
[TCP]
TCPPORT:8201
[END]
[TNC]
; # is used as ESC character
#s 0
; set mycall!!!
#i N9SEO-15
; set transmit level!!!
#%xr 400
#%D0 ; Only use Robust Packet
#S 1 ; Set channel to 1
#R 0 ; Digi off
#F 6 ; Frack 6 seconds
#N 10 ; Retries 10
#O 1 ; Maxframe 1
#P 16 ; Persist 16
#T 10 ; TX delay 100mS
#W 30 ; Slottime 30
#@T2 150 ; Resptime 1.5 seconds
#@T3 18000 ; T3
#%B R600 ; R600 used for UI
; activate KISS, if required
#@K
[END]
Thanks in advance for your time and comments. 73 Kayne N9SEO
|
Re: direwolf, signalink, and bpq32 on linux
Thanks Chris!
?
I may be confused (take it easy on packet nebie here), but I read someplace in that groups rules that packet BBS’s are not supposed to be on that net? Or is it just BBS to BBS communications that are not supposed to be on that band?
-Chris
KO4YAW
?
?
My 2 cents: Lots of HF packet on Network105 Group? 14.105 LSB
Mount Allamuchy Scout Reservation
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-------- Original message --------
From: Christopher Molnar <cmolnar65@...>
Date: 7/8/22 9:21 PM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: Re: [bpq32] direwolf, signalink, and bpq32 on linux
Hi Joshua,
?
One more question if you have time.
?
What frequency do you normally run on HF? I see two in your ID line:
14.105/7.104
?
Which one do you normally find the most activity on? I am in FL and propagation is not all that great on a good day, I think the heat kills me.
?
Thanks,
-Chris
?
Oh, and I left out my PTT config line from the instructions because from what I understand, the Signalink uses VOX.? If I'm wrong, we can discuss that.
|
Re: direwolf, signalink, and bpq32 on linux
My 2 cents: Lots of HF packet on Network105 Group? 14.105 LSB
www.network105.org
Prof. Chris Lance www.ww2bsa.org www.EastNetPacket.com www.Network105.org Radio Station Manager Mount Allamuchy Scout Reservation ARRL Life Member
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-------- Original message -------- From: Christopher Molnar <cmolnar65@...> Date: 7/8/22 9:21 PM (GMT-05:00) Subject: Re: [bpq32] direwolf, signalink, and bpq32 on linux
Hi Joshua,
?
One more question if you have time.
?
What frequency do you normally run on HF? I see two in your ID line:
14.105/7.104
?
Which one do you normally find the most activity on? I am in FL and propagation is not all that great on a good day, I think the heat kills me.
?
Thanks,
-Chris
?
Oh, and I left out my PTT config line from the instructions because from what I understand, the Signalink uses VOX.? If I'm wrong, we can discuss that.
|
Re: direwolf, signalink, and bpq32 on linux
Hi Joshua,
?
One more question if you have time.
?
What frequency do you normally run on HF? I see two in your ID line:
14.105/7.104
?
Which one do you normally find the most activity on? I am in FL and propagation is not all that great on a good day, I think the heat kills me.
?
Thanks,
-Chris
?
Oh, and I left out my PTT config line from the instructions because from what I understand, the Signalink uses VOX.? If I'm wrong, we can discuss that.
|
Bob AF9W
Red R. R. Tuby (PE1RRR)
Joshua KJ7LVZ
Christopher Molnar KO4YAW