Hello,

I have an issue with one remote BBS where after completion of forwarding, the message doesn't get labeled "PF" in my BBS - remains "PN".? This has been happening through multiple versions of BPQ - upgrades on either side do not fix it.? Fortunately the message does not remain queued, so there are no more attempts to forward it after it has been forwarded once.? Therefore it appears to be a superficial labeling issue.

The BBS log for a recent forward is shown below. This is happening only with the W9GM-1 BBS. It's not a big deal, but it would be nice to get to the bottom of it.

220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT ? ? Msg 49788 Routing Trace To W9GM Via W9GM.#
220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT ? ? Routing Trace Type P TO W9GM VIA W9GM.# Route On WW NA USA WI #SWWI
220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT ? ? Routing Trace TO W9GM Matches BBS W9GM
220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT ? ? Routing Trace W9GM Matches implied AT W9GM
220709 16:44:35 ?K5DAT ? ? Routing Trace W9GM Matches AT WG0A
220709 16:45:25 |W9GM ? ? ?Connecting to BBS W9GM
220709 16:45:26 <W9GM ? ? ?*** CONNECTED
220709 16:45:26 >W9GM ? ? ?IDLETIME 60
220709 16:45:26 <W9GM ? ? ?DATNOD:K5DAT-7} IDLETIME - 60
220709 16:45:26 >W9GM ? ? ?c 3 w9gm-7
220709 16:45:26 <W9GM ? ? ?DATNOD:K5DAT-7} Connected to GMNOD:W9GM-7
220709 16:45:26 >W9GM ? ? ?bbs
220709 16:45:27 <W9GM ? ? ?GMNOD:W9GM-7} Connected to BBS
220709 16:45:28 <W9GM ? ? ?[BPQ-6.0.23.1-B1FWIHJM$]
220709 16:45:28 <W9GM ? ? ?de W9GM>
220709 16:45:28 >W9GM ? ? ?[BPQ-6.0.23.3-B1FIHJM$]
220709 16:45:28 >W9GM ? ? ?FA P K5DAT W9GM.# W9GM 49788_K5DAT 2029
220709 16:45:28 >W9GM ? ? ?F> E5
220709 16:45:29 <W9GM ? ? ?FS +
220709 16:45:29 | ? ? ? ? ?Compressed Message Comp Len 1220 Msg Len 2031 CRC 277a
220709 16:45:33 <W9GM ? ? ?FF
220709 16:45:33 >W9GM ? ? ?FQ
220709 16:45:34 |W9GM ? ? ?W9GM Disconnected

73,

Lee K5DAT

Virus-free.