¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Availability in Europe (2019) ?

 

No, the FT-60R is NOT discontinued.?

Who told you that bad info?

--
Clint Bradford K6LCS
http//www.work-sat.com


Availability in Europe (2019) ?

Konstantinos Bibis
 
Edited

The fact is that for almost a year the now the FT-60E is not available anywhere in Europe. Even the largest shops (Wimo, WSPLC, Martyn&Lynch) do not carry it and neither do they offer the option to backorder. So Yaesu is not supplying it to the whole European market. Do we know if there are new units produced or the ones in circulation are older stock ?
I agree that FT-65 is a disappointment when seen as a FT-60 replacement. This new range of handheld transceivers(FT-65, FT-25, FT-4X, FT-4V) is a quick way to stop people turning to Chinese cheap alternatives. Nothing more. Nothing to be proud of in terms of new technology or innovation.
So, I guess the situation remains...no way to purchase the FT-60, NEW in Europe. Pitty.


Re: CHIRP difficulties with loading a code plug into an FT60R

k6whp
 

Folks,

Firstly, a Merry Christmas and best wishes for a happy new year to all and thank you all for your advice! Note that I believe this to be an idiosyncrasy of the software and not a driver problem My description was perhaps too brief. Let me enlarge on the circumstances.

The symptom I was reporting was that the "the upload to radio" dialog came up with the Vendor and Model edit boxes coming up disabled and for some reason the "OK" button was disabled as well. In fiddling with the software this morning, it allowed me to click OK which sent me to the upload instruction dialog. Following instructions, I dutifully clicked through it, got the radio into "CLONE" mode, and pressed the "MON" button whereupon the software reported a communication error. This was done several times without success.

I posted a series of pictures on my blog that show what I am talking about.

https://righthandofzod.blogspot.com/2018/12/merry-christmas-and-chirp-my-ass.html

Let's leave it at this: it's a wonderful piece of freeware but I am not presently disposed to track down and resolve why it will not write to my FT60R. I do not plan on rolling back any drivers, install any operating system patches or get any new cables. The main reason is that I already have Bob Freeth's marvelous programs for each of the Yaesu radio types I own (an FT60R, 2 VX-150s, an FT7900, an FT2900, and an FT-817) and they work flawlessly.

Were I not so bountifully appointed, I would pursue a resolution more diligently.

My sincere thanks to one and all!
--
William, K6WHP
"Cheer up, things could get worse..so I cheered up and, sure enough, things got worse!"


Re: CHIRP difficulties with loading a code plug into an FT60R

 

Jawdy has it right.? Roll back the drivers to 3.2.0.0 is the key.? Win10 is the devil and by trying to "help" you with a driver update, it breaks CHIRP.?

Mike Mc
KW4CD


Re: CHIRP difficulties with loading a code plug into an FT60R

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Roll your drivers back to Prolific 3.2.0.0., if you have a Prolific chipped cable. Should work fine, then.?

Jardy Dawson WA7JRD
Message sent through sub space hailing frequencies?using the Universal Translator.?


On Dec 24, 2018, at 04:31, Mary <m-moon@...> wrote:

Hi
When. I upgraded to win10, I could not use CHIRP anymore.?

I had the error you describe and others not recognizing port.
I tried different cords. Nope.
Some folks said I needed to go back to older drivers and others said I had to get newest drivers.

Thinking I will next try a new computer that started with win10 and was not an upgraded one.?

If I get it to work I will post the solution.

Kk4GOW?


On Dec 23, 2018, at 1:20 PM, k6whp <k6whp@...> wrote:

I checked the previous messages (perfunctorily) and did not see a direct answer to this question so my apologies for any repetition. In attempting to modify a code plug (add frequencies) to my FT60R, I thought I'd give? Chirp a whirl.

It read the data from the radio accurately and without incident. However, when I attempted to write the data back out to the radio, the dialog comes up with the vendor and model edit boxes disabled. Any suggestions or ideas?

Thanks in advance!

--
William, K6WHP
"Cheer up, things could get worse..so I cheered up and, sure enough, things got worse!"


Re: CHIRP difficulties with loading a code plug into an FT60R

 

This is my typical Chirp workflow:
  • Read current settings from rig (requires setting COM port, make, model).
  • Archive "before" config for later use.
  • Make necessary changes to config.
  • Archive "after" config for later use.
  • Write updated settings to rig (Chirp already knows rig, options to select make, model disabled).
If you create a new tab from scratch, without first reading from the rig, you'll need to select the make, model before saving it.

-Don, KE6DM


Re: CHIRP difficulties with loading a code plug into an FT60R

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi
When. I upgraded to win10, I could not use CHIRP anymore.?

I had the error you describe and others not recognizing port.
I tried different cords. Nope.
Some folks said I needed to go back to older drivers and others said I had to get newest drivers.

Thinking I will next try a new computer that started with win10 and was not an upgraded one.?

If I get it to work I will post the solution.

Kk4GOW?


On Dec 23, 2018, at 1:20 PM, k6whp <k6whp@...> wrote:

I checked the previous messages (perfunctorily) and did not see a direct answer to this question so my apologies for any repetition. In attempting to modify a code plug (add frequencies) to my FT60R, I thought I'd give? Chirp a whirl.

It read the data from the radio accurately and without incident. However, when I attempted to write the data back out to the radio, the dialog comes up with the vendor and model edit boxes disabled. Any suggestions or ideas?

Thanks in advance!

--
William, K6WHP
"Cheer up, things could get worse..so I cheered up and, sure enough, things got worse!"


Re: CHIRP difficulties with loading a code plug into an FT60R

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Did you actually try to write back to the radio? ?While the boxes may have been grayed out, did they still show the FT-60 in the box?

Jardy Dawson WA7JRD
Message sent through sub space hailing frequencies?using the Universal Translator.?


On Dec 23, 2018, at 10:20, k6whp <k6whp@...> wrote:

I checked the previous messages (perfunctorily) and did not see a direct answer to this question so my apologies for any repetition. In attempting to modify a code plug (add frequencies) to my FT60R, I thought I'd give? Chirp a whirl.

It read the data from the radio accurately and without incident. However, when I attempted to write the data back out to the radio, the dialog comes up with the vendor and model edit boxes disabled. Any suggestions or ideas?

Thanks in advance!

--
William, K6WHP
"Cheer up, things could get worse..so I cheered up and, sure enough, things got worse!"


Re: Newbie Here In SoCal

 

Get hooked up with a good radio club and you will expand you activities.

K3CLT
Chuck Tobias


On Sunday, December 23, 2018, 11:22:00 PM EST, k6whp <k6whp@...> wrote:


As others have said, congratulations on your ticket and welcome to amateur radio. Inasmuch as I am commenting on the FT60 venue, my advice may regarded by more than one of the members here with a gimlet eye. However, I would seriously -- and very respectfully -- recommend that you immediately branch out and find what other facets of the hobby/service sound intriguing.

There are these new folks who are referred to a "Baofeng Techs" who think this is only about attempting to check into drive time round tables on the local repeater with their HT (usually a Baofeng) and do little else for five or so years before going back to philately.

As an example of variety, Clint, K6LCSI, will tell you, there is a wealth fun to be discovered in Satellites. Others become enamored of HF and/or spend their hours chasing DX. VHF/UHF geeks revel in..well..the VHF and UHF technologies and the incredible explosion of digital and linked repeater systems and talk groups and all that. My personal crush is HF QRP with an eye towards building and operating outdoors whit the radios I build.

It is mind-bogging the array of fun stuff to be found here in amateur radio.

You take my point, I am sure. But one thing you may rely on is that a great many hams are more than eager to share their knowledge with you so do not be afraid to ask.

Best of luck and hope to hear you on some time!
--
William, K6WHP
"Cheer up, things could get worse..so I cheered up and, sure enough, things got worse!"


Re: Newbie Here In SoCal

k6whp
 

As others have said, congratulations on your ticket and welcome to amateur radio. Inasmuch as I am commenting on the FT60 venue, my advice may regarded by more than one of the members here with a gimlet eye. However, I would seriously -- and very respectfully -- recommend that you immediately branch out and find what other facets of the hobby/service sound intriguing.

There are these new folks who are referred to a "Baofeng Techs" who think this is only about attempting to check into drive time round tables on the local repeater with their HT (usually a Baofeng) and do little else for five or so years before going back to philately.

As an example of variety, Clint, K6LCSI, will tell you, there is a wealth fun to be discovered in Satellites. Others become enamored of HF and/or spend their hours chasing DX. VHF/UHF geeks revel in..well..the VHF and UHF technologies and the incredible explosion of digital and linked repeater systems and talk groups and all that. My personal crush is HF QRP with an eye towards building and operating outdoors whit the radios I build.

It is mind-bogging the array of fun stuff to be found here in amateur radio.

You take my point, I am sure. But one thing you may rely on is that a great many hams are more than eager to share their knowledge with you so do not be afraid to ask.

Best of luck and hope to hear you on some time!
--
William, K6WHP
"Cheer up, things could get worse..so I cheered up and, sure enough, things got worse!"


CHIRP difficulties with loading a code plug into an FT60R

k6whp
 

I checked the previous messages (perfunctorily) and did not see a direct answer to this question so my apologies for any repetition. In attempting to modify a code plug (add frequencies) to my FT60R, I thought I'd give? Chirp a whirl.

It read the data from the radio accurately and without incident. However, when I attempted to write the data back out to the radio, the dialog comes up with the vendor and model edit boxes disabled. Any suggestions or ideas?

Thanks in advance!

--
William, K6WHP
"Cheer up, things could get worse..so I cheered up and, sure enough, things got worse!"


Re: How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

 

I have two FT60s and have used them predominantly over the last 14? years. I did buy an FT70 for digital (bought DMR first) and you¡¯re right, it is a better sound quality than the DMR. The FT70 does almost everything the FT60 will and is much easier to field program. There are so many things I like about it I doubt I¡¯ll ever use the FT60s again. As far as battery is concerned, I bought a second battery. Easy fix for shorter battery life.

The FT60 has been replaced.

Jack, ae8p

On Dec 18, 2018, at 8:16 PM, Kevin Hiskey <KS0KEV@...> wrote:

Long time FT60 user, new FT70 user here. It is hard to beat the reliability, simplicity, and long battery life of the FT60. If I had to pick an HT for mission critical work (e.g. search and rescue), that is the one I would take. But, I am learning to really like the FT70. The clarity of the Fusion signals and voice quality is awesome. Dare I say it is better digital than DMR? Not sure, but I think it has a better sound. I like the small size of the FT70 and find it fairly easy to use and field program too. I hope they can address the battery life issue and sell a larger battery for it at some point. If they do, it might end up being a replacement for my FT60 for mission critical work.


On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 2:01 AM Mark Lassman via Groups.Io <kb6kgx@...> wrote:
I find the FT-60 fairly easy to field-program. I like the ergonomics of the radio in my hand, better than the VX models. My personal opinion.


On Dec 17, 2018, at 3:19 PM, ron earl <[email protected]> wrote:

The VX 8 is easier than the FT 60

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Lassman via Groups.Io
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 1:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Yaesu-FT-60] How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

Have a VX-5. Stays in the box. I find it too difficult to use. I prefer the FT-60.
On Dec 17, 2018, at 11:13 AM, ron earl <[email protected]> wrote:

I have a Yaesu VX-8 with every accessory known. GPS, Bluetooth installed, External headset w/ blue tooth, external microphone, preloaded repeaters in memory, RT systems disc and cable. A really rugged, water resistant, after market antenna and in great shape. It was owned by a Regional Fire Commander in the North of California.

Ron Earl
K7RWE
714-231-4266

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Coleman
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2018 4:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Yaesu-FT-60] How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

On December 16, 2018 4:27:53 PM EST, "Clint Bradford via Groups.Io" <clintbradford@...> wrote:
Just talked to a fellow ham who was considering the Yaesu FT-65 HT.

I faced the same choice recently. For me, it came down to the FT-70 vs the FT-60. When I read consistently that the FT-70 chewed through batteries, that tipped me towards the FT-60.

Ben


--
Ben Coleman nj8j@...
"I love the way Microsoft follows standards. In much the
same manner that fish follow migrating caribous."
Paul Tomblin











Re: How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

 

Long time FT60 user, new FT70 user here.? It is hard to beat the reliability, simplicity, and long battery life of the FT60.? If I had to pick an HT for mission critical work (e.g. search and rescue), that is the one I would take.? But, I am learning to really like the FT70.? The clarity of the Fusion signals and voice quality is awesome.? Dare I say it is better digital than DMR?? Not sure, but I think it has a better sound.? I like the small size of the FT70 and find it fairly easy to use and field program too.? I hope they can address the battery life issue and sell a larger battery for it at some point.? If they do, it might end up being a replacement for my FT60 for mission critical work.


On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 2:01 AM Mark Lassman via Groups.Io <kb6kgx=[email protected]> wrote:
I find the FT-60 fairly easy to field-program. I like the ergonomics of the radio in my hand, better than the VX models. My personal opinion.


> On Dec 17, 2018, at 3:19 PM, ron earl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The VX 8 is easier than the FT 60
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Lassman via Groups.Io
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 1:31 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Yaesu-FT-60] How ¡®Bout the FT-65?
>
> Have a VX-5. Stays in the box. I find it too difficult to use. I prefer the FT-60.
>> On Dec 17, 2018, at 11:13 AM, ron earl <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I have a Yaesu VX-8 with every accessory known. GPS, Bluetooth installed, External headset w/ blue tooth, external microphone, preloaded repeaters in memory, RT systems disc and cable. A really rugged, water resistant, after market antenna and in great shape.? It was owned by a Regional Fire Commander in the North of California.
>>
>> Ron Earl
>> K7RWE
>> 714-231-4266
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Coleman
>> Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2018 4:49 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Yaesu-FT-60] How ¡®Bout the FT-65?
>>
>>> On December 16, 2018 4:27:53 PM EST, "Clint Bradford via Groups.Io" <clintbradford=[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Just talked to a fellow ham who was considering the Yaesu FT-65 HT.
>>
>>
>> I faced the same choice recently.? For me, it came down to the FT-70 vs the FT-60.? When I read consistently that the FT-70 chewed through batteries, that tipped me towards the FT-60.
>>
>> Ben
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ben Coleman nj8j@...
>> "I love the way Microsoft follows standards.? In much the
>> same manner that fish follow migrating caribous."
>>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Paul Tomblin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>





Re: How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

David Chakmakian
 

I heard the FT-65 is made in China, (as is the Bao-Feng) whereas the FT-60 is made in Japan, FWIW.


Re: How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

 

Anyone want to buy the VX8?

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ron earl
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 4:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Yaesu-FT-60] How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

The VX 8 is easier than the FT 60

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Lassman via Groups.Io
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 1:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Yaesu-FT-60] How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

Have a VX-5. Stays in the box. I find it too difficult to use. I prefer the FT-60.
On Dec 17, 2018, at 11:13 AM, ron earl <[email protected]> wrote:

I have a Yaesu VX-8 with every accessory known. GPS, Bluetooth installed, External headset w/ blue tooth, external microphone, preloaded repeaters in memory, RT systems disc and cable. A really rugged, water resistant, after market antenna and in great shape. It was owned by a Regional Fire Commander in the North of California.

Ron Earl
K7RWE
714-231-4266

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Coleman
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2018 4:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Yaesu-FT-60] How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

On December 16, 2018 4:27:53 PM EST, "Clint Bradford via Groups.Io" <clintbradford@...> wrote:
Just talked to a fellow ham who was considering the Yaesu FT-65 HT.

I faced the same choice recently. For me, it came down to the FT-70 vs the FT-60. When I read consistently that the FT-70 chewed through batteries, that tipped me towards the FT-60.

Ben


--
Ben Coleman nj8j@...
"I love the way Microsoft follows standards. In much the
same manner that fish follow migrating caribous."
Paul Tomblin






Re: How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Two FT-60's are considered my primary radios. They just work right, feel right, and seem almost indestructible. That said, I also picked up two VX-3's because they are so small that there is NEVER an excuse not to have one with me. Of course, these can share many of the FT-60 accessories and are programmed to match.

Our local emergency comm group has switched over to the FT-2DR but all admit they are not using most of the features and have great respect for the FT-60.

Kerry?
KJ6ZZG
_._,_._,_


Re: How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

 

I've had a FT60 for years and its a great radio. Had a chance to compare it to my Baofeng UV82 at an event. The 60 could hear traffic the 82 was deaf to. I use mine for crossband operation all the time. Just a great radio.

K3CLT
Chuck Tobias


On Monday, December 17, 2018, 3:31:24 PM EST, Mark Lassman via Groups.Io <kb6kgx@...> wrote:


Have a VX-5. Stays in the box. I find it too difficult to use. I prefer the FT-60.
> On Dec 17, 2018, at 11:13 AM, ron earl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I have a Yaesu VX-8 with every accessory known. GPS, Bluetooth installed, External headset w/ blue tooth, external microphone, preloaded repeaters in memory, RT systems disc and cable. A really rugged, water resistant, after market antenna and in great shape.? It was owned by a Regional Fire Commander in the North of California.
>
> Ron Earl
> K7RWE
> 714-231-4266
>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Coleman
> Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2018 4:49 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Yaesu-FT-60] How ¡®Bout the FT-65?
>
>> On December 16, 2018 4:27:53 PM EST, "Clint Bradford via Groups.Io" <clintbradford=[email protected]> wrote:
>> Just talked to a fellow ham who was considering the Yaesu FT-65 HT.
>
>
> I faced the same choice recently.? For me, it came down to the FT-70 vs the FT-60.? When I read consistently that the FT-70 chewed through batteries, that tipped me towards the FT-60.
>
> Ben
>
>
> --
> Ben Coleman nj8j@...
> "I love the way Microsoft follows standards.? In much the
> same manner that fish follow migrating caribous."
>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Paul Tomblin
>
>
>
>
>
>




Re: How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

 

I find the FT-60 fairly easy to field-program. I like the ergonomics of the radio in my hand, better than the VX models. My personal opinion.

On Dec 17, 2018, at 3:19 PM, ron earl <[email protected]> wrote:

The VX 8 is easier than the FT 60

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Lassman via Groups.Io
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 1:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Yaesu-FT-60] How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

Have a VX-5. Stays in the box. I find it too difficult to use. I prefer the FT-60.
On Dec 17, 2018, at 11:13 AM, ron earl <[email protected]> wrote:

I have a Yaesu VX-8 with every accessory known. GPS, Bluetooth installed, External headset w/ blue tooth, external microphone, preloaded repeaters in memory, RT systems disc and cable. A really rugged, water resistant, after market antenna and in great shape. It was owned by a Regional Fire Commander in the North of California.

Ron Earl
K7RWE
714-231-4266

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Coleman
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2018 4:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Yaesu-FT-60] How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

On December 16, 2018 4:27:53 PM EST, "Clint Bradford via Groups.Io" <clintbradford@...> wrote:
Just talked to a fellow ham who was considering the Yaesu FT-65 HT.

I faced the same choice recently. For me, it came down to the FT-70 vs the FT-60. When I read consistently that the FT-70 chewed through batteries, that tipped me towards the FT-60.

Ben


--
Ben Coleman nj8j@...
"I love the way Microsoft follows standards. In much the
same manner that fish follow migrating caribous."
Paul Tomblin











Re: How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

 

My vote goes to the FT60 I have had mine about a year and works like a champ- I always carry my spare battery pack ans so far so good


Re: How ¡®Bout the FT-65?

 

I have a brand new in the box FT 60 that I won about 18 months ago at HRO during their open house. I was going to sell it but after reading these posts I think I'll keep it to use the day my current FT 60 poops out.?
Thanks, Joy