开云体育

Dazza I think I misunderstood your initial mailing. I agree one point in the first turn of EACH rout. So the Frogs on Tuesday would have lost two point each for their two routs(?). Had that been

Hi Rich, I thought that losing 1 hit per move in rout would be a little excessive, but it would certainly give you an incentive to stop them! We just need to try it out and see. Yes, I

Dazza 1. Why only the first time they rout? Surely if a unit routs twice they should loose more, or perhaps never come back? 2. Probably be right. Certainly it would give them a "Big Man"

Ken Dazza is correct, and his example of Colonel H is a classic illsutration of both the behaviour of a "Big Man" and the reaction of troops, even elite ones, to a firefight. Reading accounts of

We had a Napoleonic game last night, and the issue of units, who have routed as part of a combat lost by a friendly unit, being able to rally and return to the offensive without problem played a

<philips107s2003@y...> wrote: to reason, what Hi Ken, your observations are correct, and your desires are precisly what the rules intend to stop. Many wargames rules allow an incredible

I have used your wwii rules several times with the school wargame club. I and the boys have a problem with them as it is difficult to co-ordinate troops on the table top. Some units stop for no

Sounds excellent. Count me in. The personality unit approach is a great idea. The retinue idea would not always need to be way out/ humorous either - there's plenty of room for some sensible

Sounds good to me - Figure wise I reckon Front Rank are best but this firm http://www.empireminiatures.com do a few very nice looking W o R figures. I am trying to find out if thet are still going as

"De Bellies Lardicus" perhaps or toofatlardies own WRG (We're Really Gross). I prefer the former. I have little experience of Wars of the Roses but did once nearly come to blows with the wife over

How about "Yorkshire Git" so Sid can play. I'm up for that. Indeed we could certainly do it as a club project, each of us paint a 40 figure retinue (so Mr T would have his ready in time for 2015)

So for some reason I started thinking about Wars of the Roses or the 100 years war, and how brilliant looking the figures are. Just a shame there are no good rules that make it an enjoyable and

Nod, So far the best! Send the Vodka now and you could win! ---------- the distribution, or criminal to the

How about "Samovar!" or "Time for Political Instruction"

Actually no bloody prizes, but muchos muchos kudos to the person who thinks of the best name for the "Time Out" or "Tea Break" Card for the Russian Civil War rules. Lard Master

How about: Nah Zdahrovyeh (my best translation) with a pic of a vodka

Gents I am inclined to "Lardify" TOW, and shall have my first faltering pitch at it tomorrow. Any thoughts on card driven systems for the political arena? I feel that the Gunfight rules probably

Tis I, I have awoken from sleep after a particularly enjoyable bun fest, and having waded through my inbox deleting all the trash you lot send me. Best way to send the Kiss Me Hardy rules is in Hard

<richardclarkerli@y...>" <richardclarkerli@y...> wrote: than I certainly think we can refine this. What you have there could be used for a Pants commander- perhaps even let him allocate PIPs, then

Richard Thanks for the WWII rules, they look unusual and interesting. Where did you get the ideas from? Also can you get your fat friend to let me have the Naval rules? Many thanks Ken