开云体育

To clarify Debbie's point, this refers to the post regarding a *completely* unprocessed test. Not all male tests have received Y-DNA haplogroups yet - that process is still ongoing. - Iain.

If your Family Finder test has not been processed by FTDNA you need to get in touch with customer service and find out what has happened. Have you perhaps ended up with two different accounts and your

Ian Dundas asked: “If someone has previously uploaded their aDNA file from Ancestry and paid to have it unlocked, is there any benefit in having FTDNA do the FamilyFinder test as well? I already

These are just my observations, and initial ones at that. It appears to me that mostly older Y SNPs are found in Family Finder. However, by older I don't mean older TMRCAs for the associated

My father has taken FF but only received R-U106. I think smaller older Haplogroups are excluded.

A quick analysis of R-Z18, between November 29 and December 8, 2023, a branch which seems instructive to me on the contribution of FF tests. *Stats (including all subclades):* Kits: +599 bigY: +7

Ian, I paid FTDNA for a family finder; they uploaded my aunts file from Ancestry and failed to provide me with the results of my family finder. I can’t download paternal or mtdna .. only all.

I don’t think you will see any improvements in your ?overall results. But it might be a good idea to have a test from FTDNA (or MH or 23andMe) in order to have Raw Data from a GSA test. I believe

If someone has previously uploaded their aDNA file from Ancestry and paid to have it unlocked, is there any benefit in having FTDNA do the FamilyFinder test as well? I already have the Big Y-700 and

Hmmm I wonder which family that comes from?? :-)? I'll have to look at the FF results over the holidays.? Getting another line under that branch would be useful. Nulls rule.

And this example (below) is as good of a result as our last Big Y 700 test for the group. Of course the Big Y result includes additional private SNPs. Robert McMillan

In the MacMillan project, we just received a result from Family Finder prediction of FGC11674, which is from around 1100AD. There are also over 70 branches under that. My father in the same group only

Between the 2023-12-6 version and the 2023-12-7 version (only one day), the FTDNA’s Y-DNA Hapotree has increased by +20,000 kits in total. Below, a new comparison, which will perhaps be more

And the first one I’ve seen in the FGC902 branch: this tester was previously L48+, but now he’s Z7+, Z31+, skip FGC902, skip FGC910, FGC904+, CTS10893+. This group is dated to 850 BC. Charles

? ?Another example of an FF test from 2021 updated today is Z326+ skip Z8168 skip FGC10367, Z319+, skip Z8171, CTS2509+ dated to 950 BC. And one previously at L47 from an upstream SNP Pack is now

It would be extremely useful if the addition of this Y-info could automatically flow to the GENI World Tree. Why? Because undoubtedly a good percentage of these tested individuals have profiles in the

Hi all, The FTDNA’s Y-DNA Haplotree has received a new wave of kit additions since yesterday. Comparing the version of December 6, 2023 (~6 p.m.) to that of December 7, 2023 (~9 p.m.), I obtain an

Another way to track the updating is to follow the updating of R-M269 On Dec 6, I had 560 R-M269. Dec 8 (a.m.) ?541 so 19 have been updated or about 3% for context, i have 1502 total FF matches with

One of my Y-37 (and surname) matches has been upgraded from R-M269 to R-S1688, which is upstream from my own terminal Big-Y haplogroup and dated to being formed 2000 BCE according to Discover

Two of my 37 marker Y matches that were listed as R-269 are now listed as R-L127 the father snp of my terminal branch R-FGC-13355.