An interesting German tool for surnames
This is an interesting tool for searching for surname spread across Germany. I used first 'Bucher' and then 'Buch' since -er was added to indicate an occupation.
Geogen
|
|
| |
Geogen
|
|
By
Linda Wheaton
·
#8453
·
|
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
Here are some remarks from the article on modelling of Early Corded Ware
genetics:
"While all (n = 95) two-way proximal models lack strong support (P < 0.05;
table S17), the addition of either
By
Roy
·
#8452
·
|
Re: Ancient genomics support deep divergence between Eastern and Western Mediterranean Indo-European languages | bioRxiv
Holy smokes: an ancient R-FGC396/Y3444??!!
If pre-FGC396 and extinct lineage excepted, FTDNA may have to insert in a wicked hair-pin on the path to R-FGC396 from his R-FTT8 ancestor in Sachsen-Anhalt
By
vince@...
·
#8451
·
|
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
Thanks for the headsup, Vince. The link is now:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bFA9jge_HBbuFQFfG4hoACRHfHRn4ooI/view?usp=sharing
>
By
Roy
·
#8450
·
|
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
So one doesn't get inundated with permission requests for a Google Drive file (which defaults to Restricted access), it's advisable to change sharing permissions prior to sharing:
* Open
By
vince@...
·
#8449
·
|
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
As a stopgap measure I have placed the email containing figures in a Google
Drive folder. You may access it
By
Roy
·
#8448
·
|
R-Y49873 < was Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
Hi Michael,
?
You asked about R-Y49873, which is part of R-Z159>S3251. I am busy looking at the upper echelons of R-U106 and its early migrations, though it is likely to be a while before I have a
By
Iain
·
#8447
·
|
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
Hi folks,
?
A wee reminder to all that our space on groups.io is limited to 1 GB. We've only used 5% so far because we've been fairly judicious in our use of space, but it will only take 200
By
Iain
·
#8446
·
|
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
Hi Rich, Since I don't presently have an imgur account, I have attached a
PDF version of the post to this message.
Cheers, Roy
[email protected]> wrote:
By
Roy
·
#8445
·
|
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
The image degradation is due to groups.io normal operation. Consider uploading the images to an image hosting site like imgur, then providing a link to the images on that site.
Yahoo Mail: Search,
By
[email protected]
·
#8444
·
|
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
For reasons unknown, the plots I embedded in my previous message are
degraded on the U106 message board. If anyone would like to receive the
email directly or can offer a suggestion as to how to avoid
By
Roy
·
#8443
·
|
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
Still incredible though.
[email protected]> wrote:
By
Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...>
·
#8442
·
|
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
Oh dear.
wrote:
By
Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...>
·
#8441
·
|
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
Even more impressive that a machine composed it.
[email protected]> wrote:
By
Roy
·
#8440
·
|
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
My personal muse, ChatGPT.
By
Roy
·
#8439
·
|
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
Cripes! Very impressive.
wrote:
By
Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...>
·
#8438
·
|
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
Thank you Roy, great stuff!
I'm going to pass that along -
To whom does the credit belong?
Rob Jacobson
By
Rob
·
#8437
·
|
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
Ha! What a stitch! Pretty much describes my DNA journey, though.
Bernie Leopold
wrote:
By
Bernard Leopold
·
#8436
·
|
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
------------------------------
*The Ancestral Quest: A Genealogist's Tale*
(*To the tune of "The Ballad of Gilligan's Isle"*)
*Verses:*
Just sit right back and you¡¯ll hear a tale,
Of seekers bold
By
Roy
·
#8435
·
|
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
clever clogs robot changed autosomal to autumnal. Thought you were being
poetic for a minute, which would have been refreshing on this forum.
[email protected]> wrote:
By
Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...>
·
#8434
·
|