¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
An interesting German tool for surnames
This is an interesting tool for searching for surname spread across Germany. I used first 'Bucher' and then 'Buch' since -er was added to indicate an occupation. Geogen | | | | Geogen | |
By Linda Wheaton · #8453 ·
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
Here are some remarks from the article on modelling of Early Corded Ware genetics: "While all (n = 95) two-way proximal models lack strong support (P < 0.05; table S17), the addition of either
By Roy · #8452 ·
Re: Ancient genomics support deep divergence between Eastern and Western Mediterranean Indo-European languages | bioRxiv
Holy smokes: an ancient R-FGC396/Y3444??!! If pre-FGC396 and extinct lineage excepted, FTDNA may have to insert in a wicked hair-pin on the path to R-FGC396 from his R-FTT8 ancestor in Sachsen-Anhalt
By vince@... · #8451 ·
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
Thanks for the headsup, Vince. The link is now: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bFA9jge_HBbuFQFfG4hoACRHfHRn4ooI/view?usp=sharing >
By Roy · #8450 ·
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
So one doesn't get inundated with permission requests for a Google Drive file (which defaults to Restricted access), it's advisable to change sharing permissions prior to sharing: * Open
By vince@... · #8449 ·
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
As a stopgap measure I have placed the email containing figures in a Google Drive folder. You may access it
By Roy · #8448 ·
R-Y49873 < was Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
Hi Michael, ? You asked about R-Y49873, which is part of R-Z159>S3251. I am busy looking at the upper echelons of R-U106 and its early migrations, though it is likely to be a while before I have a
By Iain · #8447 ·
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
Hi folks, ? A wee reminder to all that our space on groups.io is limited to 1 GB. We've only used 5% so far because we've been fairly judicious in our use of space, but it will only take 200
By Iain · #8446 ·
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
Hi Rich, Since I don't presently have an imgur account, I have attached a PDF version of the post to this message. Cheers, Roy [email protected]> wrote:
By Roy · #8445 ·
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
The image degradation is due to groups.io normal operation. Consider uploading the images to an image hosting site like imgur, then providing a link to the images on that site. Yahoo Mail: Search,
By [email protected] · #8444 ·
Re: Bronze Age spread of R-U106 from ancient DNA
For reasons unknown, the plots I embedded in my previous message are degraded on the U106 message board. If anyone would like to receive the email directly or can offer a suggestion as to how to avoid
By Roy · #8443 ·
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
Still incredible though. [email protected]> wrote:
By Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...> · #8442 ·
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
Oh dear. wrote:
By Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...> · #8441 ·
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
Even more impressive that a machine composed it. [email protected]> wrote:
By Roy · #8440 ·
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
My personal muse, ChatGPT.
By Roy · #8439 ·
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
Cripes! Very impressive. wrote:
By Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...> · #8438 ·
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
Thank you Roy, great stuff! I'm going to pass that along - To whom does the credit belong? Rob Jacobson
By Rob · #8437 ·
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
Ha! What a stitch! Pretty much describes my DNA journey, though. Bernie Leopold wrote:
By Bernard Leopold · #8436 ·
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
------------------------------ *The Ancestral Quest: A Genealogist's Tale* (*To the tune of "The Ballad of Gilligan's Isle"*) *Verses:* Just sit right back and you¡¯ll hear a tale, Of seekers bold
By Roy · #8435 ·
Re: Is your EKA information accurate?
clever clogs robot changed autosomal to autumnal. Thought you were being poetic for a minute, which would have been refreshing on this forum. [email protected]> wrote:
By Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...> · #8434 ·