¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Many of the objections? made by Kari Paul, reference 138 , can similarly apply to all genetic testing - not just 23andMe!! -- Kevin Terry

Is it a good idea to test with 23andMe right now? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/23andMe#Financial_problems

The premium upgrade is required to search for haplogroup matches. All the same, I have found 23andme very useful for exploring my ancestry (including my R-L46 matches) and its autosomal breakdown to

You can search matches at 23andMe by haplogroup. I found a match at R1b-L1 that was born an Adams but was adopted by a family living close by. Jim ¡°Griz¡± Adams [email protected]> wrote:

Roughly half of the 23andMe testers would be females, so that would cut the results in half. Plus, AFAIK there is no way to see all of your Y-DNA matches there, nor any way to search by Y-DNA

I am interested in haplogroup FGC13326. FamilytreeDNA have something over 1200 testers in this haplogroup. 23andMe's data base is more than 10 times the size of FamilytreeDNA. They provide the Y

Thanks. Sorry for showing off about the size of my.....tree. [email protected]> wrote:

Piero, Don't feel bad. My results, which have been pretty consistent since 2015, changed drastically also. Germanic Europe went from 35% to 69%, England and NW Europe went from 36% to 17%, Scotland

10,421. [email protected]> wrote:

Yes, at Ancestry my Scotland component went from 46% to 17% in one leap, prompting an identity crisis! But Ancestry have a lot of members and trees, mine containing over 10,000 ancestors and

It depends on what you are looking for with regards to DNA testing. If you are looking for cousins (roughly up to the fourth cousin level) then they are worth it. While they both give you a breakdown

Hi, I saw on the web that 23andMe have a sale. Ancestry test down from €109 to €79. Is it worth it? -- Kevin Terry

_>If this is correct our dates in Neustrelitz and Mecklenburg go back to Niklot (1090-1160) ancestor of the Lords and Dukes of Mecklenburg, one of the oldest German ruling houses, and reputed to be

Hi Belinda, ? Globetrekker takes its dates from the underlying Discover system. The Discover dates have their issues, but overall they should be fairly trustworthy. ? That doesn't mean that they

Hi Iain Thanks for your comments. I certainly don't trust Globetrekker as far as recent locations go, and I have always been convinced that our excursion (L2>>CTS4099etc) to England and back is

Hi Belinda, ? Short answer to your second question: don't trust Globetrekker, particularly for R-U106. Family Tree DNA acknowledge that it's in "beta", but it's really not comparable with

Hi Belinda I don't know how much reading you have done around what are known as the Northern Wars. I was aware it was complex, but until I have had to dig into it in detail specifically for the

There is always the Journal of Genetic Genealogy, as a sort of halfway house between a blogpost and a formal scientific paper. It does have an editorial board, of course. But I can think of a few

Belinda, In Globetrekker the dates are inputs, not outputs, of the model. And FTDNA's TMRCA estimates are pretty accurate, as a rule, so I think you can rely on them pretty heavily. ?Certainly much

I¡¯m struggling with dating in the L2>Z7>Z31>DGC910>DFC904>CTS10893>CTS4099 line of R-U106. My brother is lower down this line at BY96243 (550CE) and he and another BY96243 tester descend from