¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Argo - Display Actual Radio Frequency

Chris Mac
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Argo v1 build 143 :?

I set the two left-hand boxes to 1000 and the right-hand to 10138700. This allows QRSS and WSPR to run simultaneously.?

Obviously you need a filter bandwidth of at least 1.3 kHz but WSPR prefers 2.5 kHz I think.?

The RX dial frequency should be 10138.7 kHz USB.?

You then drag the Argo scale UP to show 1014100 down to about 10139930 and can expand the span of the window using the shift and the + or - key.?

If you don't want WSPR then it's 1000 1000 10139000.?

Chris.?


Sent from Chris Mac's battery-powered transistor radio telephone.?Amateur radio: G?MQW?

On 14 Jun 2013, at 16:48, "Philip" <pcteee@...> wrote:

?

I set my receiver to 10.139000 USB
Also set Argo to 10139000 Setup/calibration

This takes care of the offset and you get a proper read out in the LHS

Hope that helps

Philip G4JVF

--- In QRPLabs@..., "Mark" wrote:
>
> Hi Gang
>
> Just built my 3rd QRSS beacon - this time it's the Hans Arduino shield. Mighty fine piece of kit too!
>
> I've managed to completely confuse myself with the setup of Argo and hence the frequency adjustment. Whilst I am sure this is a question every idiot like me asks, but I cant find the answer by searching the group.
>
> I have my Yaesu radio tuned to 10.140.00 and in USB mode. How do I configure Argo so the RHS shows me the actual frequency rather than the reading in Hz that I see right now.
>
> I think I need to worry about carrier offsets and other such complications, but not too sure. The example in the instructions shows the Argo screen with 1230 - 1320 Hz shown and I'm struggling with my little brain to understand how that relates to 10.140.00 through 10.140.10.
>
> If someone can point me at a suitable idiots guide to setting this beacon up I would be very grateful.
>
> If all goes to plan this week I will be putting this on the air as A71/G0MGX next week from Doha.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Mark. G0MGX
>


Re: Argo - Display Actual Radio Frequency

"Philip"
 

I set my receiver to 10.139000 USB
Also set Argo to 10139000 Setup/calibration

This takes care of the offset and you get a proper read out in the LHS

Hope that helps

Philip G4JVF

--- In QRPLabs@..., "Mark" <mark.g0mgx@...> wrote:

Hi Gang

Just built my 3rd QRSS beacon - this time it's the Hans Arduino shield. Mighty fine piece of kit too!

I've managed to completely confuse myself with the setup of Argo and hence the frequency adjustment. Whilst I am sure this is a question every idiot like me asks, but I cant find the answer by searching the group.

I have my Yaesu radio tuned to 10.140.00 and in USB mode. How do I configure Argo so the RHS shows me the actual frequency rather than the reading in Hz that I see right now.

I think I need to worry about carrier offsets and other such complications, but not too sure. The example in the instructions shows the Argo screen with 1230 - 1320 Hz shown and I'm struggling with my little brain to understand how that relates to 10.140.00 through 10.140.10.

If someone can point me at a suitable idiots guide to setting this beacon up I would be very grateful.

If all goes to plan this week I will be putting this on the air as A71/G0MGX next week from Doha.

Many thanks,

Mark. G0MGX


Argo - Display Actual Radio Frequency

"Mark"
 

Hi Gang

Just built my 3rd QRSS beacon - this time it's the Hans Arduino shield. Mighty fine piece of kit too!

I've managed to completely confuse myself with the setup of Argo and hence the frequency adjustment. Whilst I am sure this is a question every idiot like me asks, but I cant find the answer by searching the group.

I have my Yaesu radio tuned to 10.140.00 and in USB mode. How do I configure Argo so the RHS shows me the actual frequency rather than the reading in Hz that I see right now.

I think I need to worry about carrier offsets and other such complications, but not too sure. The example in the instructions shows the Argo screen with 1230 - 1320 Hz shown and I'm struggling with my little brain to understand how that relates to 10.140.00 through 10.140.10.

If someone can point me at a suitable idiots guide to setting this beacon up I would be very grateful.

If all goes to plan this week I will be putting this on the air as A71/G0MGX next week from Doha.

Many thanks,

Mark. G0MGX


Re: GPS behaviour very inconsistent

Barry Chambers
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

On 12/06/2013 13:15, Andy Cutland wrote:
?
Hi Barry,

Well I fired it up this morning but couldn't get anything out of it. Not sure if it was able to get a fix from where the unit is located so I will take the whole thing outside to give it a chance to see some satellites.

I checked the feed voltage and that was a stable 3.3v. The earth checked out fine too so I hope all will be good once a fix is made.

Here's hoping !

73's
De Andy





From: Andy Cutland
To: qrplabs@...
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] GPS behaviour very inconsistent

?


That's great Barry, thanks for the info.

I hope to fix it up later tonight.

73"s
de Andy

------------------------------
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 6:25 AM PDT Barry Chambers wrote:

>On 10/06/2013 18:27, Andy Cutland wrote:
>> Hi Barry,
>>
>> My up501 has just arrived from taiwan and am eager not to blow this
>> one up !
>>
>> Did you place any resistors on the unit and if so what value did you
>> use. I will be supplying the unit from a dedicated 3.3v reg supply. Am
>> I right in thinking that pin 4 and 5 can be connected together (vdd
>> and vdd b) ?
>>
>> 73's
>> De Andy
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Barry Chambers <b.chambers@...>
>> *To:* QRPLabs@...
>> *Sent:* Friday, May 31, 2013 12:18 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [QRPLabs] GPS behaviour very inconsistent
>>
>> Afternoon All
>>
>> For several weeks, I've been struggling to get my U2 kit working with a
>> EM-406A GPS module. The problem seems to be with the 1pps signal. as the
>> NEMA data is read correctly.
>>
>> Today, I got through the post a Fastrax (Reyax) UP501 GPS module (from
>> Taiwan via E-Bay, ?17, about 10 days delivery time). Hans lists this
>> module on the U2 kit web pages. It requires a 3.3v supply and the modem
>> setting is 09600,10,1,8. Hey presto! It works! I found that the "Inv
>> GPS" setting needs to be "On". The clock keeps perfect time (as compared
>> against my wireless clock), the Locator is set correctly and the DDS
>> 125MHz oscillator frequency is corrected (mine is now slightly lower
>> than 125 MHz). At present I have "Start" set at 02 and "Frame" at 04 and
>> the U2 is on soak test on 20m WSPR with a "loop" made from two pieces of
>> wire about 15cm long, joined by a 47R resistor.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Barry, G8AGN
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>> QRPLabs-fullfeatured@...>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Andy
>
>I didn't use any pull-up resistors. I connected GPS pins 4 and 5
>together and fed them from a 3.3v regulator ( TS2950CT-3.3, N68CA from
>Maplin).
>
>GPS pin 1 was left floating.
>
>In the U2 menu, "Inv GPS" should be set "On".
>
>Once a 3D fix has been obtained, the clock should run correctly
>(including the seconds). When using the WSPR mode, the Maidenhead
>location should be correct for your location and the DDS frequency
>should be slightly different from the default of 125,000,000.
>
>Hope this helps.
>
>--
>
>73
>
>Barry, G8AGN
>



Andy

I would certainly place the GPS outside. An initial fix will take a few minutes or more, depending on where satellites are in your visible piece of sky. A good way to check whether a fix has been found is to set up a spurious locator using the U2 menu and then see later whether it has been corrected.

-- 

73

Barry, G8AGN


Re: GPS behaviour very inconsistent

Andy Cutland
 

Hi Barry,

Well I fired it up this morning but couldn't get anything out of it. Not sure if it was able to get a fix from where the unit is located so I will take the whole thing outside to give it a chance to see some satellites.

I checked the feed voltage and that was a stable 3.3v. The earth checked out fine too so I hope all will be good once a fix is made.

Here's hoping !

73's
De Andy





From: Andy Cutland
To: qrplabs@...
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] GPS behaviour very inconsistent

?


That's great Barry, thanks for the info.

I hope to fix it up later tonight.

73"s
de Andy

------------------------------
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 6:25 AM PDT Barry Chambers wrote:

>On 10/06/2013 18:27, Andy Cutland wrote:
>> Hi Barry,
>>
>> My up501 has just arrived from taiwan and am eager not to blow this
>> one up !
>>
>> Did you place any resistors on the unit and if so what value did you
>> use. I will be supplying the unit from a dedicated 3.3v reg supply. Am
>> I right in thinking that pin 4 and 5 can be connected together (vdd
>> and vdd b) ?
>>
>> 73's
>> De Andy
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Barry Chambers <b.chambers@...>
>> *To:* QRPLabs@...
>> *Sent:* Friday, May 31, 2013 12:18 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [QRPLabs] GPS behaviour very inconsistent
>>
>> Afternoon All
>>
>> For several weeks, I've been struggling to get my U2 kit working with a
>> EM-406A GPS module. The problem seems to be with the 1pps signal. as the
>> NEMA data is read correctly.
>>
>> Today, I got through the post a Fastrax (Reyax) UP501 GPS module (from
>> Taiwan via E-Bay, ?17, about 10 days delivery time). Hans lists this
>> module on the U2 kit web pages. It requires a 3.3v supply and the modem
>> setting is 09600,10,1,8. Hey presto! It works! I found that the "Inv
>> GPS" setting needs to be "On". The clock keeps perfect time (as compared
>> against my wireless clock), the Locator is set correctly and the DDS
>> 125MHz oscillator frequency is corrected (mine is now slightly lower
>> than 125 MHz). At present I have "Start" set at 02 and "Frame" at 04 and
>> the U2 is on soak test on 20m WSPR with a "loop" made from two pieces of
>> wire about 15cm long, joined by a 47R resistor.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Barry, G8AGN
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>> QRPLabs-fullfeatured@...>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Andy
>
>I didn't use any pull-up resistors. I connected GPS pins 4 and 5
>together and fed them from a 3.3v regulator ( TS2950CT-3.3, N68CA from
>Maplin).
>
>GPS pin 1 was left floating.
>
>In the U2 menu, "Inv GPS" should be set "On".
>
>Once a 3D fix has been obtained, the clock should run correctly
>(including the seconds). When using the WSPR mode, the Maidenhead
>location should be correct for your location and the DDS frequency
>should be slightly different from the default of 125,000,000.
>
>Hope this helps.
>
>--
>
>73
>
>Barry, G8AGN
>




U2 Spotted on 7MHz

g3zjo
 

Not the first time I have Spotted Andy G0FTD's U2 on 40m but the mid screen ident was a spot of luck..

You may be able to spot yourself on my Grabber.

Capture also in Group Files.

73 Eddie G3ZJO


Re: WSPR TX Time Charts

g3zjo
 

On 11/06/2013 15:35, andyfoad@... wrote:
The moral of the story is ALWAYS recalibrate the systemn clock
to the xtal frequency after switching off ;-)
Hmm I was hoping for better than that, I have several Home Brew WSPR PIC MEPT's, PIC Xtal Clock sets the timing, WSPR time is accurate for months, I switch them on and off at will and they are always stable. I fetched an un used one out of the drawer after 2 years and it was still spot on.
Mind you with a GPS connected its irrelevant.

73 Eddie G3ZJO (stable sort of fellow)


Re: WSPR TX Time Charts

"andyfoad@..."
 

I am watching this one with interest too.

I have a U2 which I initially used with no GPS.

I calibrated the clock frequency correctly and left the U2 on WSPR
witn NO problems. After a day the U2 was transmitting correctly
in each assigned time slot.

BUT - if yiou switch the U2 off and then restart it (perhaps after
an LPF change) then you MUST recalibrate the system clock again,
because quartz xtals have a habit of not returning to their
original operating frequency even after warming up.

That would make the WSPR timings start to wander, e.g start at 10
seconds past the minute and getting progressively worse as time
goes on (timings maybe lagging or leading).

The moral of the story is ALWAYS recalibrate the systemn clock
to the xtal frequency after switching off ;-)

73 de Andy

--- In QRPLabs@..., "Paul KE7HR" <ke7hr@...> wrote:

Hans,

I may be in error and was only thinking of when I was testing with frame of 02, so it would start as soon as possible.

I do find it interesting that for the frame settings that do not come out equal into the 60 minutes, that there is a "short" interval before it resets to the start time value. That was one of the things that caused me to build the chart.

Paul KE7HR


Re: GPS behaviour very inconsistent

Andy Cutland
 

That's great Barry, thanks for the info.

I hope to fix it up later tonight.

73"s
de Andy

------------------------------

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 6:25 AM PDT Barry Chambers wrote:

On 10/06/2013 18:27, Andy Cutland wrote:
Hi Barry,

My up501 has just arrived from taiwan and am eager not to blow this
one up !

Did you place any resistors on the unit and if so what value did you
use. I will be supplying the unit from a dedicated 3.3v reg supply. Am
I right in thinking that pin 4 and 5 can be connected together (vdd
and vdd b) ?

73's
De Andy


------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Barry Chambers <b.chambers@...>
*To:* QRPLabs@...
*Sent:* Friday, May 31, 2013 12:18 PM
*Subject:* Re: [QRPLabs] GPS behaviour very inconsistent

Afternoon All

For several weeks, I've been struggling to get my U2 kit working with a
EM-406A GPS module. The problem seems to be with the 1pps signal. as the
NEMA data is read correctly.

Today, I got through the post a Fastrax (Reyax) UP501 GPS module (from
Taiwan via E-Bay, ?17, about 10 days delivery time). Hans lists this
module on the U2 kit web pages. It requires a 3.3v supply and the modem
setting is 09600,10,1,8. Hey presto! It works! I found that the "Inv
GPS" setting needs to be "On". The clock keeps perfect time (as compared
against my wireless clock), the Locator is set correctly and the DDS
125MHz oscillator frequency is corrected (mine is now slightly lower
than 125 MHz). At present I have "Start" set at 02 and "Frame" at 04 and
the U2 is on soak test on 20m WSPR with a "loop" made from two pieces of
wire about 15cm long, joined by a 47R resistor.

73

Barry, G8AGN


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links


<mailto:QRPLabs-fullfeatured@...>




Andy

I didn't use any pull-up resistors. I connected GPS pins 4 and 5
together and fed them from a 3.3v regulator ( TS2950CT-3.3, N68CA from
Maplin).

GPS pin 1 was left floating.

In the U2 menu, "Inv GPS" should be set "On".

Once a 3D fix has been obtained, the clock should run correctly
(including the seconds). When using the WSPR mode, the Maidenhead
location should be correct for your location and the DDS frequency
should be slightly different from the default of 125,000,000.

Hope this helps.

--

73

Barry, G8AGN


Re: WSPR TX Time Charts

"Paul KE7HR"
 

Hans,

I may be in error and was only thinking of when I was testing with frame of 02, so it would start as soon as possible.

I do find it interesting that for the frame settings that do not come out equal into the 60 minutes, that there is a "short" interval before it resets to the start time value. That was one of the things that caused me to build the chart.

Paul KE7HR

--- In QRPLabs@..., Hans Summers <hans.summers@...> wrote:

Hi Paul

For the 00 start time, the chart will be valid after the first hour since
the transmit starts in the first available slot and that it likely to be a
random time. It was easier for me to see the transmit times on a chart...
It's obviously not a particularly critical thing, but this one is
interesting. Are you sure? I just checked in the code and I couldn't see
how that would happen? I'll try to reproduce it here too!

73 Hans G0UPL


Re: GPS behaviour very inconsistent

Barry Chambers
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

On 10/06/2013 18:27, Andy Cutland wrote:
?
Hi Barry,

My up501 has just arrived from taiwan and am eager not to blow this one up !

Did you place any resistors on the unit and if so what value did you use. I will be supplying the unit from a dedicated 3.3v reg supply. Am I right in thinking that pin 4 and 5 can be connected together (vdd and vdd b) ?

73's
De Andy



From: Barry Chambers
To: QRPLabs@...
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] GPS behaviour very inconsistent

Afternoon All

For several weeks, I've been struggling to get my U2 kit working with a
EM-406A GPS module. The problem seems to be with the 1pps signal. as the
NEMA data is read correctly.

Today, I got through the post a Fastrax (Reyax)? UP501 GPS module (from
Taiwan via E-Bay, ?17, about 10 days delivery time). Hans lists this
module on the U2 kit web pages. It requires a 3.3v supply and the modem
setting is 09600,10,1,8. Hey presto!? It works! I found that the "Inv
GPS" setting needs to be "On". The clock keeps perfect time (as compared
against my wireless clock), the Locator is set correctly and the DDS
125MHz oscillator frequency is corrected (mine is now slightly lower
than 125 MHz). At present I have "Start" set at 02 and "Frame" at 04 and
the U2 is on soak test on 20m WSPR with a "loop" made from two pieces of
wire about 15cm long, joined by a 47R resistor.

73

Barry, G8AGN


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
? ?

<*> Your email settings:
? ? Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
? ?
? ? (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
? ? QRPLabs-digest@...
? ? QRPLabs-fullfeatured@...

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
? ? QRPLabs-unsubscribe@...

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
? ?




Andy

I didn't use any pull-up resistors. I connected GPS pins 4 and 5 together and fed them from a 3.3v regulator ( TS2950CT-3.3, N68CA from Maplin).

GPS pin 1 was left floating.

In the U2 menu, "Inv GPS" should be set "On".

Once a 3D fix has been obtained, the clock should run correctly (including the seconds). When using the WSPR mode,? the Maidenhead location should be correct for your location and the DDS frequency should be slightly different from the default of? 125,000,000.

Hope this helps.

-- 

73

Barry, G8AGN


Re: WSPR TX Time Charts

Hans Summers
 


Hi Paul?

For the 00 start time, the chart will be valid after the first hour since the transmit starts in the first available slot and that it likely to be a random time. It was easier for me to see the transmit times on a chart...

It's obviously not a particularly critical thing, but this one is interesting. Are you sure? I just checked in the code and I couldn't see how that would happen? I'll try to reproduce it here too!

73 Hans G0UPL


Re: GPS behaviour very inconsistent

Andy Cutland
 

Thanks for the info Andy.

I think your reply is a yes to my question in that the two pins can be connected to the same voltage source.

73's
De Andy


------------------------------

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 10:50 AM PDT andyfoad@... wrote:

Am I right in thinking that pin 4 and 5 can be connected together
(vdd and vdd b) ?
Wire the back up battery line I think it is to the 3.3vdc supply.

Then just wire the data and 1pps direct to the U2.
No pull up / down / sideways resistors - no nothing ;-)

Just make the small adjustment on the U2 menu as per Hans' website
and enjoy hassle free GPS working.

73 de Andy (UP501 user on U1/U2).


WSPR TX Time Charts

"Paul KE7HR"
 

I put a series of WSPR TX time charts in the Photos section. They show the time slot for various start times and frame settings. For the 00 start time, the chart will be valid after the first hour since the transmit starts in the first available slot and that it likely to be a random time. It was easier for me to see the transmit times on a chart...

Paul KE7HR


DDS Oscillator spreadsheet

"Paul KE7HR"
 

I put a spreadsheet to help calculate the true DDS oscillator frequency in the Files section. It allows a normal operating frequency to be used instead of an out of band frequency.

Make sure that you have an adequately warmed up oscillator and receiver since you are likely measuring the offset in single or tens of Hertz only. Then your on the air transmissions can be confirmed with receiving stations of good quality. In my case there are several WSPR stations on 80 meters that have rubidium or GPS disciplined receivers. When they all agree on my frequency, I have confidence in it.

Paul KE7HR in Phoenix, AZ


Re: GPS behaviour very inconsistent

"andyfoad@..."
 

Am I right in thinking that pin 4 and 5 can be connected together
(vdd and vdd b) ?
Wire the back up battery line I think it is to the 3.3vdc supply.

Then just wire the data and 1pps direct to the U2.
No pull up / down / sideways resistors - no nothing ;-)

Just make the small adjustment on the U2 menu as per Hans' website
and enjoy hassle free GPS working.

73 de Andy (UP501 user on U1/U2).


Re: GPS behaviour very inconsistent

Andy Cutland
 

Hi Barry,

My up501 has just arrived from taiwan and am eager not to blow this one up !

Did you place any resistors on the unit and if so what value did you use. I will be supplying the unit from a dedicated 3.3v reg supply. Am I right in thinking that pin 4 and 5 can be connected together (vdd and vdd b) ?

73's
De Andy



From: Barry Chambers
To: QRPLabs@...
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] GPS behaviour very inconsistent

Afternoon All

For several weeks, I've been struggling to get my U2 kit working with a
EM-406A GPS module. The problem seems to be with the 1pps signal. as the
NEMA data is read correctly.

Today, I got through the post a Fastrax (Reyax)? UP501 GPS module (from
Taiwan via E-Bay, ?17, about 10 days delivery time). Hans lists this
module on the U2 kit web pages. It requires a 3.3v supply and the modem
setting is 09600,10,1,8. Hey presto!? It works! I found that the "Inv
GPS" setting needs to be "On". The clock keeps perfect time (as compared
against my wireless clock), the Locator is set correctly and the DDS
125MHz oscillator frequency is corrected (mine is now slightly lower
than 125 MHz). At present I have "Start" set at 02 and "Frame" at 04 and
the U2 is on soak test on 20m WSPR with a "loop" made from two pieces of
wire about 15cm long, joined by a 47R resistor.

73

Barry, G8AGN


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
? ?

<*> Your email settings:
? ? Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
? ?
? ? (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
? ? QRPLabs-digest@...
? ? QRPLabs-fullfeatured@...

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
? ? QRPLabs-unsubscribe@...

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
? ?




Does anyone use Hell / Dx Hell ?

"andyfoad@..."
 

Does anyone use these modes at all for beaconing or MEPT's ?

(I see plenty of activity withthe Slow Hell mode, since that can easily
be seen on a standard speed QRSS grabber.)

73 de Andy


Re: Slow Hell with U2 and U1

g3zjo
 

On 08/06/2013 14:33, Dave wrote:
would not generate different steps eg. entering a 0, 1 or 2 sometimes generated the same frequency. In the middle of the 20 step band, the 1/2 hz steps worked correctly.
Yep, been there seen that.
I assume the V2.0x may address this irregularity also.
Yes indeed.

73 Eddie


Re: Slow Hell with U2 and U1

"Dave"
 

Hi Eddie

Thank you for your insight into the slow Hell.. math.
Trying to isolate the issue, I recently I mapped some Hell figures into the special messages mode and was pleasantly surprised to find that I could generate a letter V and letter E with pretty clear results on as little as 1 second timing. Each letter would require 25 numerical or letter inputs and then a few space inputs so it was a bit of a challenge for a dyslexic to do on graph paper and then transpose to inputs with U2 the editor.
The special messages mode would allow 20.... 1/2 hertz steps..... but in my case some of the numerical entries would not generate different steps eg. entering a 0, 1 or 2 sometimes generated the same frequency. In the middle of the 20 step band, the 1/2 hz steps worked correctly.
I assume the V2.0x may address this irregularity also.

Thanks for the reply
Dave Ve3kcl

--- In QRPLabs@..., g3zjo <g3zjo@...> wrote:

On 06/06/2013 00:27, Dave wrote:
Recently I have been confused by the differing results on Slow
Hellschreiber with the new U2 when compared to my earlier U1 version.
Hi Dave

I think you are the only person to have mentioned Hell Modes on the U2,
and there have been no replies.

During initial tests I abandoned the Hell Modes early on as all results
I was getting were indecipherable.
The frequency shifts (modulation) to produce Hell is critical. Being an
FSK Mode it is suffering from the arithmetic software bug in v2.01,
which is producing almost random shifts.
Additionally being a 'fast' mode the bandwidth due to the transients
software bug in v2.01 is excessive.

Standby for the essential software release v2.0X.

73 Eddie G3ZJO