¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
WPSD is not channel 6 in Paducah (Re: [M17-Users] Other platforms or methods for M17
I have only recently become hotspotted - someone gifted me a Nano-Spot a few years back and I just made it go this month. Whole new world of geekery ... necessitated by the fact that I don't have an
By Peter Laws · #76 ·
Re: Help me understand ...
<steve.stroh@...> wrote: Sorry for contributing to that! DMR also wins converts because it's really close to plug/play. You buy what amounts to a 1U rackmount server with an N
By Peter Laws · #75 ·
Re: Other platforms or methods for M17
My personal thanks to W0CHP for taking the time to provide WSPD details here. That was very informative. 73, Bob KB6CIO
By ROBERT KLIMAN KB6CIO · #74 ·
Re: Other platforms or methods for M17
Some modes can crossmode, because the codec version/protocol is the same between the modes. Transcoding is used when the codec versions/protocols are different/incompatible between the modes.
By W0CHP - Chip · #73 ·
Re: Help me understand ...
We¡¯re drifting a bit from M17, but hey, we¡¯re all learning a lot, especially me! So carry on - I just don¡¯t want this to turn entirely into ¡°re-engineering D-Star¡±. That said, here¡¯s my
By Steve Stroh N8GNJ · #72 ·
Re: Other platforms or methods for M17
Transcoding is pretty much outside the domain of WPSD. The original Pi-Star never transcoded, and WPSD would have followed suit. These suites are built around MMDVMHost and related software, which is
By Tony Langdon · #71 ·
Re: Help me understand ...
<vk3jed@...> wrote: OK - so my comparison to the other schemes is correct? Yay me (if true). :-) Being able to send data along with the voice is a great thing, IMHO. D-STAR's stream
By Peter Laws · #70 ·
Re: Help me understand ...
<steve.stroh@...> wrote: K6BP's slideshow indicates that Icom has apparently licensed the code in newer radios versus actually using a DVSI chip, but your point is still valid. I
By Peter Laws · #69 ·
Re: Help me understand ...
M17 uses 4FSK modulation at 4800 baud (9600 bps). Last I knew, there were 3 modes defined: Full rate voice (Codec2 3200). This is currently by far the most dominant format. However there¡¯s still
By Tony Langdon · #68 ·
Re: Help me understand ...
Peter: Good comparison! I¡¯ll leave it for others to comment on your M17 summary - I haven¡¯t done enough homework quite yet. One advantage I see to M17 is that it¡¯s largely a software / protocol
By Steve Stroh N8GNJ · #67 ·
Help me understand ...
Not clear on where M17 fits into the firmament. o D-STAR (JARL copyright, Icom trademark) - a stream protocol that uses AMBE to digitize the voice part of the stream and wiggles the electrons as GMSK.
By Peter Laws · #66 ·
Re: Other platforms or methods for M17
Robert: If one is a user of those platforms, please plead your use case for adding M17 as a supported mode to the respective developers. Every platform has to evolve to meet new issues that arise -
By Steve Stroh N8GNJ · #65 ·
Other platforms or methods for M17
BlueDV and ClearNode have many other digital technologies available. Is there any way to influence the developers of those to add M-17 ? I there anyone that can help the WPSD Digital Voice by W0CHP
By ROBERT KLIMAN KB6CIO · #64 ·
Re: Brief update on M17-Users
Steve, you have earned my respect. You was precise in your analysis. I believe that the key for mass-adoption of M17 is the price. Yes, it is difficult to have gain of scale with new products, but it
By Luzem¨¢rio · #63 ·
Re: Brief update on M17-Users
Canadian Radiocommunication Regulations SOR/96-484 PART V Requirements for the Operation of Radio Apparatus Operation in the Amateur Radio Service Technical Requirements Communications with Radio
By Peter Laws · #62 ·
Re: Brief update on M17-Users
Yes, this could set a new standard for on air applications.? And before the bush lawyers get all huffy, cryptographic signing should be legal in most jurisdictions, because the prohibition is usually
By Tony Langdon · #61 ·
Re: Brief update on M17-Users
I also subscribed today. You have a lot of great information! 73, Bob KB6CIO Sent from my not so smart phone. Please excuse typos, auto-correct disasters, and fat-fingering errors.
By ROBERT KLIMAN KB6CIO · #60 ·
Re: Brief update on M17-Users
Tony: Thanks for jumping in and adding detail, especially... Oops¡­ I forgot to mention the new capability to cryptographically sign transmissions (and thus, authenticate a transmission). That is
By Steve Stroh <steve@...> · #59 ·
Re: Brief update on M17-Users
Hopefully we'll be able to navigate a way through the transition to a paid list.? Certainly more of us subscribing to Zero Retries would be a good start. :) In between sport (and possibly work), I'll
By Tony Langdon · #58 ·
Re: Brief update on M17-Users
Pete: That wasn¡¯t the intent, but Thanks! Steve N8GNJ Steve Stroh N8GNJ (he / him / his) Editor Zero Retries Newsletter - https://www.zeroretries.org Radios are Computers - With Antennas!
By Steve Stroh N8GNJ · #57 ·