开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

A homemade diode power sensor for HP meters


 

Hi guys,

as you all know, the HP 435A, 436A, 437A and so on are quite nice power meters and the meter itself is availabe at quite low prices. However, the power sensors are quite expensive. I own a 8481A? and a 8484A, both in nice and working condition, but I don't want to damage anything so I treat them like raw eggs and handle them extremely careful. So I always thought whether it would be possible to make a own diode power sensor which is compatible to the HP 436A. This would have the advantage that the 436A could be used (and therefore its HPIB capabilities), and if it works with the 436A, it will do so also with the other meters (and possibly others, I don't know). Further, the homebrew power sensor would be cheap and if it breaks, no matter, it can be repaired easily.

So today I spent a few hours on making my own power sensor. I checked the schematic of the 8481A power sensor, and I did basically the very same. I came up with this schematic: (I don't want to waste valueable web space for the group, so I uploaded the high resolution pictures to my webspace)



The letters on the right side are the connector pins for the HP 436A, of course. Then I made a quick 'dead bug' style prototype, as follows.... (please don't laugh at me :-) ).



I connected to the 436A and I also installed a SMA 30dB attenuator at the input and connected my power sensor to the power reference of the 436A. At first, the readings were quite off a bit, but using the little trim pot on my PCB, I was able to precisely adjust the gain of my sensor such that the reading on the power meter was exactly 0.00 dBm. I then connected a signal generator to the power sensor and tested various power levels between -10dBm and +20dBm. Incredible, but my power sensor was accurate to 0.1dB! I also tested different frequencies between 1MHz and 2.6GHz. The flatness was not extremely good, but between +/-1dB. So, basically, the concept seems to work. I also tested different ranges for the power sensor - there is a 'mount resistor' inside the HP power sensors (8481, 8482, 9494, ...) which tells the power meter which range the sensor uses; the meter then internally adjusts the gain according to the power sensor range.

It appears that it should be possible to home brew such power sensors. However, at the moment, I have two issues:
a) the auto zero function does not work - even if I run the autozero feature, the power meter afterwards displays -13dBm anyway, so I cannot properly zero my power sensor. At the moment, I do not understand why this is so. Has anyone on the list an idea?
b) I don't understand exactly how the amplifier using the NPN transistor works. When I was adjusting the gain of my sensor, I tried to change the collector resistor (330 Ohms), but this had almost no effect on the gain. The emitter resistor (1k Ohms) also had only little effect on the gain. Only when I placed the pot where it is now I was able to adjust the gain in a wide range. So it basically looks to me like this amplifier is a common emitter amplifier, with the gain being RC / RE, is that true? why then is a feedback from the emitter required to the meter?

Thanks for any hints, tips and so on,
Tobias HB9FSX


 

This is an interesting project.? As you say the meters themselves are dirt cheap.? I have seen blown sensors sold cheap as well and maybe it's possible to build your circuit into one of those which would have the advantage of connectors and case already taken care of.? If a small inexpensive SM board is made to do this it could easily fit and be so inexpensive that it wouldn't even be worth the time to troubleshoot a failure, just replace the board if it gets blown out.

Peter

On 11/17/2018 11:52 AM, Tobias Pluess wrote:
Hi guys,

as you all know, the HP 435A, 436A, 437A and so on are quite nice power meters and the meter itself is availabe at quite low prices. However, the power sensors are quite expensive. I own a 8481A? and a 8484A, both in nice and working condition, but I don't want to damage anything so I treat them like raw eggs and handle them extremely careful. So I always thought whether it would be possible to make a own diode power sensor which is compatible to the HP 436A. This would have the advantage that the 436A could be used (and therefore its HPIB capabilities), and if it works with the 436A, it will do so also with the other meters (and possibly others, I don't know). Further, the homebrew power sensor would be cheap and if it breaks, no matter, it can be repaired easily.

So today I spent a few hours on making my own power sensor. I checked the schematic of the 8481A power sensor, and I did basically the very same. I came up with this schematic: (I don't want to waste valueable web space for the group, so I uploaded the high resolution pictures to my webspace)



The letters on the right side are the connector pins for the HP 436A, of course. Then I made a quick 'dead bug' style prototype, as follows.... (please don't laugh at me :-) ).



I connected to the 436A and I also installed a SMA 30dB attenuator at the input and connected my power sensor to the power reference of the 436A. At first, the readings were quite off a bit, but using the little trim pot on my PCB, I was able to precisely adjust the gain of my sensor such that the reading on the power meter was exactly 0.00 dBm. I then connected a signal generator to the power sensor and tested various power levels between -10dBm and +20dBm. Incredible, but my power sensor was accurate to 0.1dB! I also tested different frequencies between 1MHz and 2.6GHz. The flatness was not extremely good, but between +/-1dB. So, basically, the concept seems to work. I also tested different ranges for the power sensor - there is a 'mount resistor' inside the HP power sensors (8481, 8482, 9494, ...) which tells the power meter which range the sensor uses; the meter then internally adjusts the gain according to the power sensor range.

It appears that it should be possible to home brew such power sensors. However, at the moment, I have two issues:
a) the auto zero function does not work - even if I run the autozero feature, the power meter afterwards displays -13dBm anyway, so I cannot properly zero my power sensor. At the moment, I do not understand why this is so. Has anyone on the list an idea?
b) I don't understand exactly how the amplifier using the NPN transistor works. When I was adjusting the gain of my sensor, I tried to change the collector resistor (330 Ohms), but this had almost no effect on the gain. The emitter resistor (1k Ohms) also had only little effect on the gain. Only when I placed the pot where it is now I was able to adjust the gain in a wide range. So it basically looks to me like this amplifier is a common emitter amplifier, with the gain being RC / RE, is that true? why then is a feedback from the emitter required to the meter?

Thanks for any hints, tips and so on,
Tobias HB9FSX


 

Very cool, Tobias.

You may want to study up on the interface between the 436 and sensor heads. There's typically a particular resistor in each head type for identification by the 436 - it then figures out the scaling based on which head is installed. You should be able to fool it into thinking it's something else, close enough to work with your circuit.

Good luck,
Ed


 

@Peter
thanks. Yes, exactly, the meters themselves are really cheap. I currently don't have access to some blown 8481A or similar sensors, so I cannibalized a sensor cable :-( because the connectors seem to be HP specific ones and are not available e.g. at Mouser or so.
But yes, as soon as I have a working circuit, I will it design such that it fits into the normal housing for those power sensors. I also thought of milling my own housing which would be similar to the original HP housing anyways.
The cool stuff is that Agilent and Keysight still use the same interface (at least for some power meters) as far as I know, so the sensor should work with any of those!

@Ed
?thanks also. Yes, I tried to study on the interface between the 436 and the power sensor. The resistor you are talking about is called the mount resistor in the 8481A manual. Here is the general schematic of this sensor:



The service manual tells which resistor value is used for the different ranges. I think it will be possible on the homemade sensor to add a little switch to change the mount resistor value and therefore the range the meter uses - such, the same sensor could be used for different power ranges. The 436A power ranges are very limited, as far as I remember.

However, what I don't understand in the interface between the meter and the sensor is how the autozero circuit works, and I am also a bit unsure about the working principle of the amplifier formed by Q1 in the sensor (see schematic) and the OpAmp in the meter. Do you know more details about how it works?

Best
Tobias HB9FSX


 

Interesting project. The diagram you show is for the Thermocouple "A" suffix sensor. While the principle and basic circuit is the same for diode and thermocouple, the A2 PCB is different so there must be a difference in the circuit. This may be related to your offset issue.

Robert G8RPI.


 

开云体育

Robert,
do you own a schematic of the diode sensors? The schematic for the thermocouple sensors was hard enough to obtain. In the current service manuals, there are of course no schematics at all, and the HP journals of that time also don't show the actual schematics of the sensors.

Tobias



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: "Robert G8RPI via Groups.Io" <robert8rpi@...>
Date: 11/17/18 20:09 (GMT+01:00)
Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] A homemade diode power sensor for HP meters

Interesting project. The diagram you show is for the Thermocouple "A" suffix sensor. While the principle and basic circuit is the same for diode and thermocouple, the A2 PCB is different so there must be a difference in the circuit. This may be related to your offset issue.

Robert G8RPI.


 

8484A diode sensor schematic is here...





On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 11:17 AM Tobias Pluess <tobias.pluess@...> wrote:
Robert,
do you own a schematic of the diode sensors? The schematic for the thermocouple sensors was hard enough to obtain. In the current service manuals, there are of course no schematics at all, and the HP journals of that time also don't show the actual schematics of the sensors.

Tobias



 

开云体育

Orin beat me to it but BAMA also have a copy (with some the change sheets) at:

I bought a box of a dozen dead 84xx sensors a while back for about 60 USD, with much the same idea in mind but haven't got round to it yet! I would happy to ship one over to you if it would help?

Adrian

On 11/17/2018 7:19 PM, Tobias Pluess wrote:

Robert,
do you own a schematic of the diode sensors? The schematic for the thermocouple sensors was hard enough to obtain. In the current service manuals, there are of course no schematics at all, and the HP journals of that time also don't show the actual schematics of the sensors.

Tobias



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: "Robert G8RPI via Groups.Io" <robert8rpi@...>
Date: 11/17/18 20:09 (GMT+01:00)
Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] A homemade diode power sensor for HP meters

Interesting project. The diagram you show is for the Thermocouple "A" suffix sensor. While the principle and basic circuit is the same for diode and thermocouple, the A2 PCB is different so there must be a difference in the circuit. This may be related to your offset issue.

Robert G8RPI.


 

You seem to have an extra diode, no terminator and reversed polarity. The terminator is probably the issue.
The 11863A calibrator manuals may give some clues too.



Robert G8RPI.


 

Hi ,

it seems to me that q1 and q2 (FET) form an electronic key. then the capacitors must be there for the switch to work properly without switching aberrations. Already C7 and C8, possibly keep the input impedance controlled and prevent q1 (bjt) from oscillating.

Em sábado, 17 de novembro de 2018 17:49:59 BRST, Robert G8RPI via Groups.Io <robert8rpi@...> escreveu:


You seem to have an extra diode, no terminator and reversed polarity. The terminator is probably the issue.
The 11863A calibrator manuals may give some clues too.



Robert G8RPI.


 

Hi Robert,

yes, I have an extra diode. While the RF has negative polarity, the 3.3nF capacitor gets charged through the bottom diode. As soon as the RF has positive polarity, the top diode conducts, and the voltage across the 3.3nF capacitor adds to the RF voltage. So this detector works like a kind of charge pump, offering a higher output voltage at the same RF level. I hope to improve the sensitivity with this.

Concerning the terminator - yes I forgot to add a 50 Ohm resistor in my schematic. And, besides that, I used an external 6dB pad at the input, which I probably should have mentioned earlier. This improves return loss and definitely provides a DC path for the diodes.

Tobias


 

Hi Tobias, I looked at the OP again, and realized that you already knew about the "mount" resistor - I didn't notice that the first time. I grabbed that 8484A manual pdf that Orin linked - thanks Orin, I have lots of 8484As, and the manual somewhere, but can never seem to find it. Now I have a fresh copy.

Anyway, after refreshing my memory on these sensors, and looking also at the 8481A schematic, I'd recommend studying both types - the TC and diode models have a different arrangement for the auto-zeroing function. The circuit you posted puts the AZ feedback to the detector, as in the 8481A TC circuit, but that won't work right. With the TC type, it is a low impedance source, so the AZ current can go through, and offset the signal. With a diode detector, you should use a circuit like in the 8484A, which applies it to the ground-side JFET switch in the chopper. The diode detector is a high impedance source, so you don't want to put the AZ feedback current there.

Good luck,
Ed


Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd
 

On Sat, 17 Nov 2018, 17:30 Peter Gottlieb <hpnpilot@... wrote:
This is an interesting project.? As you say the meters themselves are dirt
cheap.? I have seen blown sensors sold cheap as well and maybe it's possible to
build your circuit into one of those which would have the advantage of
connectors and case already taken care of.? If a small inexpensive SM board is
made to do this it could easily fit and be so inexpensive that it wouldn't even
be worth the time to troubleshoot a failure, just replace the board if it gets
blown out.

Peter

The worrying thing is the Chinese counterfeiters will probably do just that. eBay seller yixunhk springs to mind - someone called them the HP rebirthing centre. I can see them "rebirthing" power sensors. ?

Dave



 

Yeah, that would be bad, essentially counterfeit sensors made from shells of fried ones.? And they would sort of work, just nowhere near spec.

On 11/17/2018 6:34 PM, Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2018, 17:30 Peter Gottlieb <hpnpilot@... <mailto:hpnpilot@...> wrote:

This is an interesting project.? As you say the meters themselves are dirt
cheap.? I have seen blown sensors sold cheap as well and maybe it's
possible to
build your circuit into one of those which would have the advantage of
connectors and case already taken care of.? If a small inexpensive SM
board is
made to do this it could easily fit and be so inexpensive that it wouldn't
even
be worth the time to troubleshoot a failure, just replace the board if it
gets
blown out.

Peter


The worrying thing is the Chinese counterfeiters will probably do just that. eBay seller yixunhk springs to mind - someone called them the HP rebirthing centre. I can see them "rebirthing" power sensors. ?

Dave



 

The 12-pin circular connector used on the power sensors is an Amphenol.? The old part number was 91-T-3638.
Now, it's part of their "C 091 A/B/D" series circular connectors.? Several variations are listed in the Amphenol catalog:
https://www.amphenol-sine.com/pdf/catalog/C091Amphenol.pdf

Mouser has several slightly expensive options (a few of which appear in this link -- note that widening the Mouser search filter will supply more results):


It appears that an eBay seller is selling them at a lower price.? His text says they are the 12-pin versions, although his photo shows the 14-pin version.? It's hard to tell which of the two connectors he is selling.? However, it appears the two additional pins shouldn't matter since it's the female part of the connector -- you would leave those two extra pins unconnected.



 

In my connector search above, I didn't pay any attention to how the connector mounts onto the device.? For a new homebrew design, it probably doesn't matter.? But, if you are specifically trying to replace the connector in an existing HP power sensor unit, you might have to check if you needed a front-threaded or a rear-threaded panel mount connector.?


 

开云体育

Mouser also shoes the wrong picture.

I use these:

Lumberg Series 03 - Circular connectors with threaded joint M16 acc. to IEC 61076-2-106, IP40/IP67/IP68


But not cheap either.

73, Rainer



Am 18.11.2018 um 10:04 schrieb rmc321 via Groups.Io:

The 12-pin circular connector used on the power sensors is an Amphenol.? The old part number was 91-T-3638.
Now, it's part of their "C 091 A/B/D" series circular connectors.? Several variations are listed in the Amphenol catalog:


Mouser has several slightly expensive options (a few of which appear in this link -- note that widening the Mouser search filter will supply more results):


It appears that an eBay seller is selling them at a lower price.? His text says they are the 12-pin versions, although his photo shows the 14-pin version.? It's hard to tell which of the two connectors he is selling.? However, it appears the two additional pins shouldn't matter since it's the female part of the connector -- you would leave those two extra pins unconnected.




 

Hi Guys,

sorry for my late reply.

Today I was able to make some further progress. Robert was right in his post (/g/HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment/message/92641) - the autozero problem I encountered was indeed related to the position where I connected the autozero signal. In principle, I have now the same schemativ as the 8484A diode power sensor.
After moving the autozero signal, I still had the problem that the autozero did not work properly, so I further analyzed the circuit of the 8484A and realised that it has less gain than my circuit, so I changed the base resistor of Q1 (https://hb9fsx.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/8481schem.png) to 1k Ohms and the autozero problem was fixed - pressing the autozero button perfectly allows the meter to zero the sensor. However, with this modification, my sensor had a different gain, and therefore the readings on the meter had an offset. I was able to re-adjust the gain with the trim pot and when I put a 10dB attenuator at the sensor input, I was able to have the same readings on the meter as on the signal generator I used to test the sensor. However, as I said, it is not terribly accurate, at very low power levels, it was around -1dB off, and at high power levels, it seems like the diode transitions from square law region to linear region and therefore the readings were also off a bit. But this is no big deal; one can simply add attenuators in front of the sensor such that it is ensured the diode is in its square law region.

Thanks at Orin for the 8484A sensor schematic. I have never found it, even though I was of course looking for it.

Joarez (/g/HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment/message/92646) says that the capacitors need to be there to prevent the circuit from generating switching abberations. This is probably true because the 8484A manual tells that the capacitors were factory selected individually for each sensor, so they are probably related somehow to the JFET switches. In my sensor, I currently don't have these capacitors, and this is probably another reason why the readings are not 100% accurate. It could also be related to the JFETs I use - I chose the first ones I could get, but somewhere in my junk boxes I should have a pile of 2N4856, which are probably better. However, I would prefer SMD devices since I will make a PCB in SMD design. I got a bunch of MMBFJ310, but I have not enough of them to make a lot of experiments :-/


Thanks also to rmc321 and Rainer for the link to the connectors. I was once told that HP used their own connectors, so I didn't even try too hard to find the connectors, but very good you found them! I could have saved my valuable power sensor cable if I had known it earlier :-)

I think I am soon going to make another dead bug prototype and in parallel design a PCB and probably my own housing. I will share the design files as soon as I am ready.

Tobias HB9FSX


 

Tobias

Interesting project.

I am surprised that you had trouble finding 848X schematics. They are in every service manual from the 1980's? ( and we of course have them available for modest purchase price in PDF :-).. 8481A, 8481B, 8481D, 8481H, 8482A, 8483A, 8481B, 8484A, 8485A, 8487A an a few more)

Any preliminary data on frequency range and how level it is over the range? What frequency are you doing the initial testing at ..50MHz calibrator?

looking forward to seeing the design files !

Dave
NR1DX
manuals@...

On 11/18/2018 9:05 AM, Tobias Pluess wrote:
Hi Guys,

sorry for my late reply.

Today I was able to make some further progress. Robert was right in his post (/g/HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment/message/92641) - the autozero problem I encountered was indeed related to the position where I connected the autozero signal. In principle, I have now the same schemativ as the 8484A diode power sensor.
After moving the autozero signal, I still had the problem that the autozero did not work properly, so I further analyzed the circuit of the 8484A and realised that it has less gain than my circuit, so I changed the base resistor of Q1 () to 1k Ohms and the autozero problem was fixed - pressing the autozero button perfectly allows the meter to zero the sensor. However, with this modification, my sensor had a different gain, and therefore the readings on the meter had an offset. I was able to re-adjust the gain with the trim pot and when I put a 10dB attenuator at the sensor input, I was able to have the same readings on the meter as on the signal generator I used to test the sensor. However, as I said, it is not terribly accurate, at very low power levels, it was around -1dB off, and at high power levels, it seems like the diode transitions from square law region to linear region and therefore the readings were also off a bit. But this is no big deal; one can simply add attenuators in front of the sensor such that it is ensured the diode is in its square law region.

Thanks at Orin for the 8484A sensor schematic. I have never found it, even though I was of course looking for it.

Joarez (/g/HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment/message/92646) says that the capacitors need to be there to prevent the circuit from generating switching abberations. This is probably true because the 8484A manual tells that the capacitors were factory selected individually for each sensor, so they are probably related somehow to the JFET switches. In my sensor, I currently don't have these capacitors, and this is probably another reason why the readings are not 100% accurate. It could also be related to the JFETs I use - I chose the first ones I could get, but somewhere in my junk boxes I should have a pile of 2N4856, which are probably better. However, I would prefer SMD devices since I will make a PCB in SMD design. I got a bunch of MMBFJ310, but I have not enough of them to make a lot of experiments :-/


Thanks also to rmc321 and Rainer for the link to the connectors. I was once told that HP used their own connectors, so I didn't even try too hard to find the connectors, but very good you found them! I could have saved my valuable power sensor cable if I had known it earlier :-)

I think I am soon going to make another dead bug prototype and in parallel design a PCB and probably my own housing. I will share the design files as soon as I am ready.

Tobias HB9FSX
--
Dave
Manuals@...
www.ArtekManuals.com


 

开云体育








-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] A homemade diode power sensor for HP meters
Datum: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 14:11:44 +0100
Von: DF6NA Rainer <df6na@...>
Antwort an: [email protected]
An: [email protected]


Mouser also shoes the wrong picture.

I use these:

Lumberg Series 03 - Circular connectors with threaded joint M16 acc. to IEC 61076-2-106, IP40/IP67/IP68


But not cheap either.

73, Rainer



Am 18.11.2018 um 10:04 schrieb rmc321 via Groups.Io:

The 12-pin circular connector used on the power sensors is an Amphenol.? The old part number was 91-T-3638.
Now, it's part of their "C 091 A/B/D" series circular connectors.? Several variations are listed in the Amphenol catalog:


Mouser has several slightly expensive options (a few of which appear in this link -- note that widening the Mouser search filter will supply more results):


It appears that an eBay seller is selling them at a lower price.? His text says they are the 12-pin versions, although his photo shows the 14-pin version.? It's hard to tell which of the two connectors he is selling.? However, it appears the two additional pins shouldn't matter since it's the female part of the connector -- you would leave those two extra pins unconnected.