¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: New version 0.20.0 #R1CBU-Firmware

 

On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 01:10 AM, Simon Collins wrote:
I look forward to more detail on your radio
https://r1cbu.ru/index.php/home/radio-software/trx-brass/17-trx-brass-summary


Re: New version 0.20.0 #R1CBU-Firmware

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi Oleg,

thanks a lot for your amazing work on this transceiver.

Let's hope that someone with appropriate skills will take over your job.

Pls keep us posted about you new developments!

73 de F5UJA

Le 29/02/2024 ¨¤ 21:56, Oleg - R1CBU a ¨¦crit?:

Hello!

I am no longer satisfied with the quality of this transceiver. I am not happy with development for a device that is based on closed code. I don't want to waste any more time on this.
I decided to suspend firmware development for the Xiegu X6100 and develop my own transceiver in which these shortcomings will be eliminated.
If Xiegu is suddenly interested in continuing my work, I am open to communication.

Fixed:

  • Feedback when playing audio
  • Fixed bugs in QTH window

Added:

  • Auto level for waterfall and spectrum
  • Speaker mode settings (in Vol:2 menu page)
  • Acceleration of freq change (None/Lite/Strong)
  • Callsign settings
  • FT8/4 transmit (Limit 5W)
  • Voice assistant:
    • Quick settings in Vol:4 menu page
    • 4 voice options
    • Less intrusive voice assistant
    • Custom action for switch voice mode (default long DNF)
    • Custom action for speaking battery voltage (default long DFL)
    • Speaking HMic direct freq enter
Video:
Download:

?

--
OMicalement, Michel de F5UJA


Re: New version 0.20.0 #R1CBU-Firmware

 

Oleg, thank you for all you've done!!!

Question for anyone: I can't figure out how to input my callsign. When I type it, and then put the cursor over the "checkmark" at the lower-right, the screen closes, but the callsign doesn't "stick." When I then try to transmit on FT8, it says I need to input my callsign. I just can't figure it out ¡ª what am i missing?

73, Randy K7RAN


Re: New version 0.20.0 #R1CBU-Firmware

 

Oleg,
I understand 100% how you feel about working with the development of your software for the X6100, and especially dealing (or trying to deal) with Xiegu.

I also wanted to tell you how much I and many others appreciate all your hard work on the #R1CBU firmware, and I am really amazed by your skills in figuring out how the X6100 works internally and in writing the whole application from scratch.

73,
Franco K4VZ


Re: New version 0.20.0 #R1CBU-Firmware

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hello Oleg,

?

Thank you for all your hard work and adding voice to your firmware for blind hams. I look forward to hearing more about your radio and hope you keep the blind ham in mind as you develop your firmware for the radio.

?

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Oleg - R1CBU
Sent: Thursday, February 29, 2024 2:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [xiegu-x6100] New version 0.20.0 #R1CBU-Firmware

?

Hello!

I am no longer satisfied with the quality of this transceiver. I am not happy with development for a device that is based on closed code. I don't want to waste any more time on this.
I decided to suspend firmware development for the Xiegu X6100 and develop my own transceiver in which these shortcomings will be eliminated.
If Xiegu is suddenly interested in continuing my work, I am open to communication.

Fixed:

  • Feedback when playing audio
  • Fixed bugs in QTH window

Added:

  • Auto level for waterfall and spectrum
  • Speaker mode settings (in Vol:2 menu page)
  • Acceleration of freq change (None/Lite/Strong)
  • Callsign settings
  • FT8/4 transmit (Limit 5W)
  • Voice assistant:
    • Quick settings in Vol:4 menu page
    • 4 voice options
    • Less intrusive voice assistant
    • Custom action for switch voice mode (default long DNF)
    • Custom action for speaking battery voltage (default long DFL)
    • Speaking HMic direct freq enter

Video:
Download:

?


Re: New version 0.20.0 #R1CBU-Firmware

Georgina Joyce M0EBP She / Her
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hello Oleg,

Thank you for your work with the X6100. Your desire to give blind hams access to this radio has opened opportunities to several blind hams that I know of and I look forward to trying this latest version. Several of us are already waiting to hear about the new transceiver too.?

I am sure we will keep in touch.

All the best.


On 29 Feb 2024, at 20:56, Oleg - R1CBU <belousov.oleg@...> wrote:

Hello!

I am no longer satisfied with the quality of this transceiver. I am not happy with development for a device that is based on closed code. I don't want to waste any more time on this.
I decided to suspend firmware development for the Xiegu X6100 and develop my own transceiver in which these shortcomings will be eliminated.
If Xiegu is suddenly interested in continuing my work, I am open to communication.

Fixed:

  • Feedback when playing audio
  • Fixed bugs in QTH window

Added:

  • Auto level for waterfall and spectrum
  • Speaker mode settings (in Vol:2 menu page)
  • Acceleration of freq change (None/Lite/Strong)
  • Callsign settings
  • FT8/4 transmit (Limit 5W)
  • Voice assistant:
    • Quick settings in Vol:4 menu page
    • 4 voice options
    • Less intrusive voice assistant
    • Custom action for switch voice mode (default long DNF)
    • Custom action for speaking battery voltage (default long DFL)
    • Speaking HMic direct freq enter
Video:
Download: https://r1cbu.ru/index.php/home/files/download/3-x6100/19-x6100-r1cbu-0-20-0

?


Georgina

Author of Efficient Brief Podcasts, designed to Empower Blind People to enjoy their hobby!

For radio accessible stuff for people living with sight loss visit:
http://www.spencerweb.net/Downloads/downloads.html

Don't forget the most valuable resource in the radio world!
www.blindhams.com

Why not Join us via AllStar
Active Elements Bridge 56870
Blind Hams 506313 or via phone app 50617

Personal Radio Contact info:
Call: M0EBP
DMR ID: 2346259
Allstar: 521780 52340
Locater: IO83PS



Re: New version 0.20.0 #R1CBU-Firmware

 

Thanks Oleg for what you have done for all of us and good luck with your new adventure!

73 de Bill, PY2BIL


Re: New version 0.20.0 #R1CBU-Firmware

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks Oleg only use your software .

WSPR never made it on such as life¡­

Will be looking out for your radio.

?

Andrew


Re: New version 0.20.0 #R1CBU-Firmware

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi Oleg can we say thank you for your skill and hard work . It has been a great improvement of what is potentially a good radio and one I enjoy . It¡¯s sad that xiegu don¡¯t interact more and have a fully open system. I look forward to more detail on your radio.
Simon G8HAM

On 29 Feb 2024, at 21:49, Lisa WO?L <lr7521061@...> wrote:

?
Thank you Oleg?

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 14:56 Oleg - R1CBU <belousov.oleg@...> wrote:

Hello!

I am no longer satisfied with the quality of this transceiver. I am not happy with development for a device that is based on closed code. I don't want to waste any more time on this.
I decided to suspend firmware development for the Xiegu X6100 and develop my own transceiver in which these shortcomings will be eliminated.
If Xiegu is suddenly interested in continuing my work, I am open to communication.

Fixed:

  • Feedback when playing audio
  • Fixed bugs in QTH window

Added:

  • Auto level for waterfall and spectrum
  • Speaker mode settings (in Vol:2 menu page)
  • Acceleration of freq change (None/Lite/Strong)
  • Callsign settings
  • FT8/4 transmit (Limit 5W)
  • Voice assistant:
    • Quick settings in Vol:4 menu page
    • 4 voice options
    • Less intrusive voice assistant
    • Custom action for switch voice mode (default long DNF)
    • Custom action for speaking battery voltage (default long DFL)
    • Speaking HMic direct freq enter
Video:
Download:

?


Re: New version 0.20.0 #R1CBU-Firmware

 

Thank you Oleg?

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 14:56 Oleg - R1CBU <belousov.oleg@...> wrote:

Hello!

I am no longer satisfied with the quality of this transceiver. I am not happy with development for a device that is based on closed code. I don't want to waste any more time on this.
I decided to suspend firmware development for the Xiegu X6100 and develop my own transceiver in which these shortcomings will be eliminated.
If Xiegu is suddenly interested in continuing my work, I am open to communication.

Fixed:

  • Feedback when playing audio
  • Fixed bugs in QTH window

Added:

  • Auto level for waterfall and spectrum
  • Speaker mode settings (in Vol:2 menu page)
  • Acceleration of freq change (None/Lite/Strong)
  • Callsign settings
  • FT8/4 transmit (Limit 5W)
  • Voice assistant:
    • Quick settings in Vol:4 menu page
    • 4 voice options
    • Less intrusive voice assistant
    • Custom action for switch voice mode (default long DNF)
    • Custom action for speaking battery voltage (default long DFL)
    • Speaking HMic direct freq enter
Video:
Download:

?


Re: New version 0.20.0 #R1CBU-Firmware

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Oleg ¨C

?

Many thanks for the countless hours that you¡¯ve invested in the X6100 ¨C something to be proud of. I don¡¯t blame you a bit for going in a different direction! I use your software exclusively whenever I operate my X6100.

?

73,

?

Daniel/K4DB

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Oleg - R1CBU
Sent: Thursday, February 29, 2024 3:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [xiegu-x6100] New version 0.20.0 #R1CBU-Firmware

?

Hello!

I am no longer satisfied with the quality of this transceiver. I am not happy with development for a device that is based on closed code. I don't want to waste any more time on this.
I decided to suspend firmware development for the Xiegu X6100 and develop my own transceiver in which these shortcomings will be eliminated.
If Xiegu is suddenly interested in continuing my work, I am open to communication.

Fixed:

  • Feedback when playing audio
  • Fixed bugs in QTH window

Added:

  • Auto level for waterfall and spectrum
  • Speaker mode settings (in Vol:2 menu page)
  • Acceleration of freq change (None/Lite/Strong)
  • Callsign settings
  • FT8/4 transmit (Limit 5W)
  • Voice assistant:
    • Quick settings in Vol:4 menu page
    • 4 voice options
    • Less intrusive voice assistant
    • Custom action for switch voice mode (default long DNF)
    • Custom action for speaking battery voltage (default long DFL)
    • Speaking HMic direct freq enter

Video:
Download:

?


New version 0.20.0 #R1CBU-Firmware

 

Hello!

I am no longer satisfied with the quality of this transceiver. I am not happy with development for a device that is based on closed code. I don't want to waste any more time on this.
I decided to suspend firmware development for the Xiegu X6100 and develop my own transceiver in which these shortcomings will be eliminated.
If Xiegu is suddenly interested in continuing my work, I am open to communication.

Fixed:

  • Feedback when playing audio
  • Fixed bugs in QTH window

Added:

  • Auto level for waterfall and spectrum
  • Speaker mode settings (in Vol:2 menu page)
  • Acceleration of freq change (None/Lite/Strong)
  • Callsign settings
  • FT8/4 transmit (Limit 5W)
  • Voice assistant:
    • Quick settings in Vol:4 menu page
    • 4 voice options
    • Less intrusive voice assistant
    • Custom action for switch voice mode (default long DNF)
    • Custom action for speaking battery voltage (default long DFL)
    • Speaking HMic direct freq enter
Video:
Download: https://r1cbu.ru/index.php/home/files/download/3-x6100/19-x6100-r1cbu-0-20-0

?


Re: Battery will not charge

 

Randy

Someone with a bad battery needs to open their radio unplug the battery because the charging circuit on the back panel with the battery, plug in external power and see if it comes on.

My battery has not failed so when it does that what I would do¡­. But the big part of the Charging Circuit is the battery management board next to the battery. ?It is designed to protect you from a battery failure and because you can¡¯t charge you battery¡­ your battery failed. Generally usually the management system may be reactivated once you fix why the battery failed in the first place.

Tom
AE5NF


Re: Best Random Wire Length for 75-10 Meters?

 

Yes of course experiments are the base of any ham operator but as starting point you can use the wonderful advises of Palomar¡¯s engineers. Check their website and their presentations files given during many hamfests.?

honestly they helps me to understand things more precisely. Thanks for that.?

73, Ben.?


Re: Best Random Wire Length for 75-10 Meters?

 

Tuning a single random piece of wire without a matching unit is possible, but just because it tunes, doesn't mean anyone can hear you. Using an antenna as close to resonant is pretty important for success with a qrp rig. The 6100 is susceptible to rf interference, common mode current much more than other radios. It is your radio, and the great thing about the hobby is we can all experiment and use our experience to guide ourselves. Grab a spool of wire, head out and see how it goes.
I always get a kick out of people comparing equipment to a radio that costs half or a third as much as the things they are comparing to. Compare the products that cost the same as the X6100. Oh wait, they don't make anything that competes in the price range. Rant off.


Re: Battery will not charge

randy, k8zfj
 

If the battery AND the charging circuit is defective, will the 6100 still operate on external power?
--
72's de k8zf, randy


Re: Best Random Wire Length for 75-10 Meters?

 

For End Fed Wire might look at DXEngineering.? They have some good notes on the antenna and wire lengths.





73, ron, n9ee/r

Ron Wright, N9EE/R
Hernando Co ARES EC
Spring Hill, Florida also n9ee55@...


On Tuesday, February 27, 2024 at 05:15:33 PM EST, Michael VE3WMB <mbabineau.ve3wmb@...> wrote:


Your best bet would be an 84 to 86 foot wire with a 17 foot elevated counterpoise.? This is W3EDP antenna and it would provide the most consistent impedance for matching from 80m through 10m as it is a non-resonant length.?
There may be shorter lengths that will work but with the X6100 tuner but you are pretty much guaranteed success with this length.?

Michael VE3WMB?


Re: Best Random Wire Length for 75-10 Meters?

 

Your best bet would be an 84 to 86 foot wire with a 17 foot elevated counterpoise.? This is W3EDP antenna and it would provide the most consistent impedance for matching from 80m through 10m as it is a non-resonant length.?
There may be shorter lengths that will work but with the X6100 tuner but you are pretty much guaranteed success with this length.?

Michael VE3WMB?


Re: Best Random Wire Length for 75-10 Meters?

 

I built a small 9:1 balun with an inexpensive toroid and spare wire. I paired it with a 41-foot random wire and 17-foot counterpoise. My x6100 tunes that antenna pretty easily from 10m to 80m and even 160m. I'll probably try it with the next longer wire soon to see the difference in performance.?

--
John Flinchbaugh
john@...

On Tue, Feb 27, 2024, 5:06?PM Tom Henderson - N6QDI <n6qdi@...> wrote:
Greetings Dennis --

I think the crux of the issue is your desire to avoid a balun.?

As you probably know most folks use a 9:1 balun with a random wire antenna;? I think the prior responses provide adequate data for that.

But since few people do use a balun, getting no-balun info may be a challenge.

You could probably go out and give it a try and have your answer in a couple hours;? string a long wire up in a tree and trim the length until you get to the limits of the tuner.

But I am curious...? why do? you want to avoid the balun?? At the X6100 power levels 9:1 baluns are small, light and affordable, so it seems like the best approach to most operators.? So I'm curious about your situation.

-Tom N6QDI


Re: Best Random Wire Length for 75-10 Meters?

 

Greetings Dennis --

I think the crux of the issue is your desire to avoid a balun.?

As you probably know most folks use a 9:1 balun with a random wire antenna;? I think the prior responses provide adequate data for that.

But since few people do use a balun, getting no-balun info may be a challenge.

You could probably go out and give it a try and have your answer in a couple hours;? string a long wire up in a tree and trim the length until you get to the limits of the tuner.

But I am curious...? why do? you want to avoid the balun?? At the X6100 power levels 9:1 baluns are small, light and affordable, so it seems like the best approach to most operators.? So I'm curious about your situation.

-Tom N6QDI