开云体育

I tied the transceiver at 80m and you were right.. everything is working smoothly.. probably an RF issue caused by the antenna (hamking hvt 400 ) ...I will wait for the dummy load to double check that

I recommend updating the basic one to 1.1.7. Some inaccuracies when working with the battery have been corrected there. In version 1.1.6, the battery capacity is calculated simply based on the current

I will setup a reference TX Oleg to test the decoding levels and let you know the results. Out of interest, I have base FW of 1.1.6 Mar 7th and APP v1.1.7 on the radio... The reason I kept the 1.1.6

I’ve doing some FT8 with the Xiegu, and in a few occasions the frequency scale was off by a few hundred kHz. After restarting the radio a couple of times, it went back to the right values. Has

Product Review - Xiegu X6100 HF/6-Meter QRP http://www.radiomanual.info/schemi/Vari/Xiegu_X-6100_review_QST_2022.pdf ?73, Steve

Are those legal or just inconvenient for the user? So they could've lied when they made this report? I can't read it because it's not that accessible. I wish they had a file or something that had it.

If you want to take your electronics background a little further get a tinySA Ultra Spectrum analyzer and learn how to use its functions including the signal generator part. Of course you will need

According to the QST review, all harmonics were better than FCC requirements. They did not look for transmitted spurious but noted that there were numerous low-level receive spurious responses.

I just installed ver. 19.? Up and working just fine! I'm working through the buttons and dials. Everything looks good and works well. TNX, Oleg! -- KD6YKI - Mike

i have the same setujp. I use an EFHW antenna (wire in a tree!)). I had a serious common mode issue. I've put a choke (MFJ-915). It helps a lot, but I still have issues on 40 Meters. Have you tried

from the QST in depth: During my testing I did find spurious tones on all bands. However, these spurious tones were low enough on the HF bands that they were not discernable when an antenna was

I am quite new to this hobby... it is my first radio and? just got my ham radio license? a week ago... dummy load is on the way... when i receive it, I will update the status of the shack... if it

Xiegu has the QST test report on their homepage: https://www.cqxiegu.com/newsinfo/785639.html 73, Rainer DG1SMD

Someone messaged that it is in the July 2022 issue. I haven’t read the review but if it was bad we would all know about by now.

In the United States, it is fine for unlicensed people to listen to Pam radios on whatever frequency they choose including HF as long as they don't transmit. How you would know a lot about radios and

I agree. Also my QRZ email doesn't match. QRZ is way more public, so I set up a specialized email with my call sign to use with it, and to give over the air so people could contact me there and I

Is QST a magazine or something? Where would I find it? I've looked and looked about spurious emission testing and I can't find anything. These results will not stop me from using the radio, but it

Lisa, the review of the x6100 is in the July 2022 issue of QST. ?73, Steve

I’m pretty sure that there is a QST review of the 6100. Though I haven’t seen it it would contain much info on transmitter performance.

Sometimes people can be shortsighted. I don’t see having to have a callsign as being a valid necessity to joining a group. We need to be more open and accepting to all with an interest, it just may