开云体育

I’m pretty sure that there is a QST review of the 6100.? Though I haven’t seen it it would contain much info on transmitter performance.

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 18:32 Sabra Ewing <sabra1023@...> wrote:

If you could that would be great. Could you tell me what the data means since I don't know anything about it? I didn't realize you can have spurious emissions on receive so now I'm curious about spurious emissions on transmit and receive.

I'm sure the people from various countries here do not want to get in trouble with governing regulating entities, or volunteers helping to internally regulate as is done in some countries like the United States.

Will I need to be innovative with my antenna design to eliminate harmonics up and down every band or do I not have to worry about it?

You would think that if people were getting in trouble because of this radio it would be in the reviews.

Sabra Ewing

On Dec 18, 2023, at 1:04?PM, Ron Wright via <lt_wright_flg=[email protected]> wrote:

?

I have a good spectrum analyzer good to 1.5 GHz.? I have looked at other rigs, mostly VHF and UHF rigs.? Most of the Chinese rigs do look rather bad.

I might look at my X6100.

73, ron, n9ee/r

Ron Wright, N9EE/R

Hernando Co ARES EC

Spring Hill, Florida also n9ee55@...

On Monday, December 18, 2023 at 01:48:43 PM EST, Sabra Ewing <sabra1023@...> wrote:

I just wanted to make sure this Radio doesn't put out spurious emissions above appropriate levels. I am going to get mine tested if I can find a way to do so as I don't have the equipment for it.

?

For those of you who have the equipment, it would be cool if you could test your own radios and get back to us with the results.