开云体育

See below: Correct. When addressing a consist, NCE command stations: - Always sends speed commands to the consist address. - Always send function commands to the lead loco alias (or rear if you select

Just out of curiosity Look at you car roster sorted by location and see if your cars show up on the"missing" tracks John Birmingham

Norman, The program will only list tracks that the train can use. Look at the 7 tracks carefully, there's something you did to tell the program that those tracks can't be used. Let us know what you

Some of my staging tracks do not show up when I try to build a train. I have 50 staging tracks, all set up identically, all loaded with cars. I have the option to select which track to use to build a

Fraser, I recommend that you move your custom signal mast system to your user files location. This eliminates the need to update the JMRI install location each time you install a different release.

Steve, I've been having some problems myself, always thinking it must be me... but it seems my upgrading to the latest test version has not only revealed some great and useful improvements in the

Ted, You say you have the functions on both units set to respond to the consist address. Set the functions you want to stay off on the second unit to respond to locomotive address only. Wil, More

Correct. A fuller explanation at: <https://sites.google.com/site/markgurries/home/nce-info/nce-consisting> -- Dave in Australia

I have been building up my proposed layout in PanelPro for quite some time now and have run ito signalling problems on several occasions making me strip lots of bits of track out and start again. This

Further testing has found that the stack appears to not work. When I set the stack to be available, it does not appear to respond to the XpressNet command to view the stack. The response given back is

Paul, sorry for the sort of Hi-Jack, have you had any dealings with the DR5000 by Digikeijs and if so, do you have any knowledge of its XpressNet implimentation?

I checked and 7.4.2 was the beginning of it, but I think there were more changes a bit later. But I'd ask if you think you see mention of it in the notes. Sometimes what gets entered into the notes is

Hello Z21 Users, As I mentioned in an e-mail a few weeks ago, I was acquiring a Roco Z21. That unit arrived, and I've had a little time to work on some of the issues reported in JMRI's Z21 support.

Greetings. I have the current production release of JMRI, I have windows 10 and the current update of JAVA.I have Digitrax loconet via RRcirkits locobuffer. The layout has been running fine for

Hi Keith, The layout is built. I just need someone to do the JMRI integration. I am located in Los Angeles, so this would have to be done remotely. A JPG of my layout is attached. Thank you and best

Scott, Are you looking to have someone build your layout, or your control panel, or both? Having spent the last 5 years or so building and refining my layout panel, I might want to give yours a try.

When using advance consisting with NCE, what you say is usually true, sometimes you have to adjust, I think, CV21 and CV22 to get the lights right. However, with NCE you run the consist with the lead

Perhaps the documentation would be far better if we as model railroaders were to pay the volunteer developers what JMRI was actually worth, but then it would not be as far advanced as it is now.

up_sbrown, thank you for the nice words. Yes, I know all that. I do read the release notes. I do know these are experimental test releases. I wish there was a better attention to detail when it comes

Hi Peter, Sorry I haven't responded sooner, been covered up and out of town. Do you remember what files you actually changed code in? If so, here's my suggestion to make your changes visible. 1) Fork