Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Jmriusers
- Messages
Search
Panels
Ok ladies and gents, I have a layout drawn up and in JMRI. I can pull the panel up use all the turnouts from the panel all this works great. My question after operating on a few different layouts. How do I get the panels to load once I select the profile I want for the panels to come up without having to select the file of the panels. I have the start up instructions set but what am I missing. I’ve seen several iterations once the profile is selected it brings up the panels belonging to that profile without actually having to select the files. |
I have all of the jumpers removed from the USB board.(I read that in a NCE tech note). I will get the log data when I get home. _____________________________________________ Bill Suarez - +1 508-735-7877 - wsuarez@... From: "Ken Cameron via groups.io" <kcameron@...> Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2025 7:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [jmriusers] After Windows 11 upgrade I can no longer communicate via NCE USB module Bill S, ? Looking deeper into the code, I see I need to know more things. I’ll recap:
? But so far it is looking like you may not have the right jumper settings in the NCE USB and the version ID it is giving doesn’t match what it should be for the SB5 system. But depending on which jumper settings, the baud rate may also need
to change to match what it expects. ? But with the details above, I can guide the right answers. ? -Ken Cameron, Member JMRI Dev Team ? ? ? |
开云体育Bill S, ? Looking deeper into the code, I see I need to know more things. I’ll recap:
? But so far it is looking like you may not have the right jumper settings in the NCE USB and the version ID it is giving doesn’t match what it should be for the SB5 system. But depending on which jumper settings, the baud rate may also need to change to match what it expects. ? But with the details above, I can guide the right answers. ? -Ken Cameron, Member JMRI Dev Team
? ? ? |
Re: command centre same loconet operation over and over and over and over in a loop
Thanks, Dick Bronson, Would have never thought that would be the issue. If you can have an Unscheduled Disassembly of a rocket mid flight (twice in 2 month)
I guess the New "Buffer Dump" Feature isn't that bad in comparison.
?
Is this the beginning of the New Dark Ages?
?
Inobu
?
?
?
? |
Speed testing, Sensors, Speedometer output
#scripting
As I posted a few weeks ago, I'm setting up a speed matching loop.? Using 8 BD-20 NCE detectors, 1 AIU, PH-Pro, RS-232 to computer running JMRI (Windows 11 OS).
?
Using the Ultimate Speed Matching (USM) scripts as a basis, modifications seem to be working well with the following exceptions:
?
Speed measurements can be all over the place due to "bounce" on the detectors.? The JMRI Speedometer Tool seems to not see this as much (doing exit to exit on the tool).? So will adding de-bounce to the 8 sensors help?? Do I use active bounce, inactive bounce, both?? Does this change the factors for calculating speeds since in the script, it's looking for sensors changed?
?
Is there a way for the USM script to open up the speedometer windows and provide an output back to the USM script.? In other words, is there a way in the USM script to call the speedometer and get the result back to use rather than the timers used in the USM script?
?
Another couple anomalies:
--? After the script is complete, I then run the loco at the speed steps and measure the expected speed and it seems to run a couple mph slower than during the script.
--? Has anyone figured out how to speed match with an ESU decoder where SS28 is always 255 and the top of the curve is adjusted with CV5 and the rest of CV67-94 are proportional?
--? Using the 3rd lowest measured speed seems to be a short cut.? Has anyone taken the measured speeds, throw out the top two and bottom two and return the average speed?
?
I have a current methodology to manually set the speed table by running the loco at SS 5, 10, 15, 20, 24, 28 and entering the measured speed into a spreadsheet that then tells me what setting to set each of those to in order to get the desired speeds (my standard is 10, 20, 30, 40, 55, 70 at those SS).? After I get more of the bugs worked out of the modified USM script, I'll take a turn at trying this method.
?
?
Phil Hartung?
Idaho Falls, ID
? |
开云体育Bill S, ? I confirmed by looking at the code that I need to see the system log of that startup to give you a correct explanation. But the general statement is the code is seeing a version number coming back from the interface that doesn’t match with the settings in the connection. But I’m thinking the message in the popup window may be misleading as currently worded. ? -Ken Cameron, Member JMRI Dev Team
?
|
开云体育Bill S, ? This message happens with the ID from the connection, like 6.2.1, doesn’t agree with your settings. Please post the console log from your startup (before making any changes) so I can confirm that code made the right decision. What I am looking for is the line that looks like this: ? 17:53:35,155 jmri.jmrix.nce.NceConnectionStatus??? INFO? - NCE: NCE EPROM revision = 6.2.1 [AWT-EventQueue-0] The value after the equals is the trigger. Knowing what you had set in the preferences and matching to that code will figure this out. ? I’ll also need to know which jumpers you set on the NCE USB to confirm it worked correctly or not. ? -Ken Cameron, Member JMRI Dev Team
? ? |
Re: command centre same loconet operation over and over and over and over in a loop
Thanks everyone Dick’s suggestion about turning on track power was my problem. ?I was so use to resetting all my turnouts to their default positions before turning on track power I never tried that solution. ? With the Dcs100 I would power up the layout reset all switch's to their default and than turn on track power, need to learn a new routine now for the dcs210+ |
开云体育Well I just tried use Power Cab (like it says) even though I have an SB5 and the message didn’t appear again so I am going to try and read a locomotive. ? Very strange as under Windows 10 it did work as SB5. ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Bill Suarez via groups.io
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2025 5:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [jmriusers] After Windows 11 upgrade I can no longer communicate via NCE USB module ? SB5 Wouter. ? I’m going to try some of the other device types to see if that makes a difference. ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of whmvd via groups.io ? Bill ? What is your command station? ? Wouter ? On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 at 21:22, Bill Suarez via <wsuarez=[email protected]> wrote:
|
开云体育SB5 Wouter. ? I’m going to try some of the other device types to see if that makes a difference. ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of whmvd via groups.io
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2025 4:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [jmriusers] After Windows 11 upgrade I can no longer communicate via NCE USB module ? Bill ? What is your command station? ? Wouter ? On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 at 21:22, Bill Suarez via <wsuarez=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Bill What is your command station? Wouter On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 at 21:22, Bill Suarez via <wsuarez=[email protected]> wrote:
|
开云体育Thanks. I am using USB A to USB B cable into NCE USB adapter. ? I will verify Java version. ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of vincent marino via groups.io
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2025 4:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [jmriusers] After Windows 11 upgrade I can no longer communicate via NCE USB module ? One year ago I upgraded to W11 with NCE hardware. I had to use Java21 to get it to work. Serial connector to USB cable worked best. ? On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, 2:54 PM Bill Suarez via <wsuarez=[email protected]> wrote:
|
One year ago I upgraded to W11 with NCE hardware. I had to use Java21 to get it to work. Serial connector to USB cable worked best. On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, 2:54 PM Bill Suarez via <wsuarez=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Re: Track Analysis Tool
#operationspro
On Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 02:47 PM, <billramp@...> wrote:
however I do need to add flatcars and gondolas as they were down below 20% in total of all track types.Not a good reason to add them.? It only means that your flatcars can only take 20% of the available track space, or 1/5 five cars could be a flatcar going to one of those track types.? I wouldn't change a thing. ?
With regards to boxcars, I agree with you, you might have a few too many!
?
Dan |
Locked
File /ProblemsBeingWorkedOn/181.xml uploaded
#file-notice
Group Notification
The following items have been added to the Files area of the [email protected] group. By: Phil Law <tlcphil@...> Description: |
Re: Frequently Asked Questions/Topics/Official Announcements?
I never see those first.
Change topics to messages and at the top right click on date so it shows the newest messages first. -- Peter Ulvestad Linux Mint 22.1, JMRI 5.11.3plus, Java 21.0.5 JMRI Users Group Moderator ( /g/jmriusers ) JMRI Developers Group Moderator ( ) Tam Valley Group Moderator ( ) Sprog-DCC Group Moderator ( ) Edmonton Model Railroad Association ( ) |
Track Analysis Tool
#operationspro
First off, yes, probably have too many boxcars on the layout. ?So I ran the track analysis tool for boxcars and the results were:
Spurs. ?Track length 2877. 141%
Yard. ?Track length 2070. ?196%
CI. ?Track length 2635. ?154%
Staging. Track length 1050. ?386%
?
I run in Aggressive mode with 2 passes and get good car movement, however I do need to add flatcars and gondolas as they were down below 20% in total of all track types.
?
To what level should I be adjusting the boxcar percentages for best utilization?
?
Bill Ramp |
Frequently Asked Questions/Topics/Official Announcements?
Rather than take up an entire screen with pinned, read-only messages, so we have to scroll down just to see any new messages, would it be possible to have a single message, linking to the topics in a Frequently Asked Questions/Topics article?
?
Just a thought...
? |
OperationsPro New feature, Routes
#operationspro
OperationsPro users, there's a new feature that I would like feedback on.? There's now a control for local moves in a train's route.? See for more information.
?
Any comments, good or bad are welcomed.
?
Dan |