开云体育

Isn’t this better discussed on the JMRI developers forum I’m concerned we’re over complicating things for the majority of our users and I’d hate to distress them any more Phil G

Robert Heller <heller@...> It *is* true of the snap version of firefox or chromium. -- Robert Heller -- Cell: 413-658-7953 GV: 978-633-5364 Deepwoods Software -- Custom

I have found that AppImage to be a viable option for some applications and the least problematical. -- Robert Heller -- Cell: 413-658-7953 GV: 978-633-5364 Deepwoods Software --

Flatpak is mainly to get around shared library version dependency issues, partitularly with LTS Linux distributions and "bleeding edge" applications. Since JMRI is coded in *JAVA*, its only system

They are solutions in search of a (non-existant) problem... I *suppose* there is a "want" of a one-file / one-command install process for Linux. Download one file, run one install command. This

Is there another way of adding roster media images other than drag and drop? (I can't seem to find one) why? I'm using a Raspberry Pi with Wayland. Drag and drop doesn't seem to work with Wayland,

Shift + Windows key + S? for Windows snipping tool..

Good morning I thought it might be helpful for you to know a little more about my layout. It is a Kato Amherst 2005 modified by adding 3 additional feet because I wanted longer trains. I have a

Don't get me wrong. I've used containers in the past to solve issues of incompatible library version dependencies and sandboxed environments. I just don't believe this to be the case for JMRI at the

I think it’s worthwhile to at least see how hard it would be to set this up. IIRC, there was a previous discussion about it a year or two ago, but we never really established what it would take to

Agreed. I've always seen these things (including Snap and AppImage) as ultimately a solution looking for a problem. I have not once had a positive experience with any, no matter how much merit the

Whilst it would be a good idea for those with time and interest to keep an eye on using Flatpak there's no need for it as an official solution until it becomes a problem running JMRI on a Linux

Gendre, Note that Java 11 is not available on several distributions, for example Debian testing. JMRI recommends Java 17. Daniel

Keith, See the attached image. At the bottom right of the window, you have a button "Release". Click that button before auto run the warrant. Daniel

In another post someone mentioned animating their turntable display on the panel.? They said this was accomplished with logixng. In looking at the documentation for logixng it appears that if I had

And I haven’t seen anyone listing the advantages of either tbh

Peter, I don't know if it is still true, but the Flatpak install of Firefox would not display the JMRI help pages. Dave Sand

This seems to me to be a similar discussion about using docker that is on the developers group: https://jmri-developers.groups.io/g/jmri/message/10424 Personally I have no interest in using either

Ken, I don't know what your operating plans are, but the 23/27 crossover does appear to be redundant. When you use two turnouts as a crossover, you do need a block boundary. You do not need any

For more informations: Flatpak is a GNU/Linux Desktop package format. Is goal is to provide the same environment to execute an app on each GNU/Linux distribution that support Flatpak. Which include