开云体育

Locked Re: SML signal mast problem #sml


 

Ken,

I don't know what your operating plans are, but the 23/27 crossover does appear to be redundant. ?

When you use two turnouts as a crossover, you do need a block boundary.? You do not need any signal masts.
Only one track segment is needed but I like to make the split obvious. ?Here I have color coded the blocks to make the block boundaries visible.

I have not explained the LT01(B) and LT01(C) issue very well. ?Maybe this will help.
LT01(B) is attached to the straight leg of LT1 which is the 812 block. ?LT01(C) is attached to the diverging leg which is the 806 block. ?Therefore the icon should be located next to the proper track.

Note: ?I like that you include the connection letter in the signal mast user name. ?I do the same thing. ?Many years ago I gave up on trying to use directions, such as east/west, left/right, etc., in signal mast user names.

Once you have made the changes for LT26/LT14 and made the same change for 23/27 or delete them and related signal masts, you need to delete all of the SML and do the Auto Generate Signaling Pairs.

Dave Sand


----- Original message -----
From: Ken Fordham <j.kenneth.fordman@...>
Subject: Re: [jmriusers] SML signal mast problem #sml
Date: Tuesday, October 01, 2024 8:49 PM

Good evening, Dave
I have some questions this time.?
1. Can I remove turnouts 23 & 27?
2. Can I remove block 817 also??
I am sending the file back.
I really appreciate your help.
Best?
KenF
Ecuador?

Join jmriusers@groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.