开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
Date
Pix and Data of IC-7000 in English please.
I have a picture of the IC-7000 and the specifications in French available as a download from ftp://ftp.yehudi.ca/ham-radio/ic-7000.pdf I was wondering if anyone has a picture of the IC-7000
By Ya`akov N. Miles <ve7alq@...> · #77 ·
Manual
Hello, would you please point me to the link? I have a fast broadband connection but cannot get to the published sites! Thanks, Laurier St.Onge ( W1LSO ) love the looks of what I've seen in
By w1lso <w1lso@...> · #76 ·
Re: Price of the IC-7000
Hi Peter, As far as I can determine without the schematics, the 756Pro3 uses the same DSP, ADC and DAC as the 756Pro2. It has been reported that the noise reduction is superior to that of the Pro2;
By Adam Farson · #75 ·
Re: FCC approval
Ic 7000 is not for TX only Rx some one have got model numbers wrong But .Thier is R 7000 model out have seen on a website.Yes keith you are right in a way this radio has software problems I read on
By gregory fox · #74 ·
Re: Past ICOM patterns?
Yes they have had code free ham licenses for years and did not have disincentive licensing.... .....which has sparked the spectacular growth of Ham Radio and the associated electronics
By Dr. Howard S. White <drpaper@...> · #73 ·
Re: Past ICOM patterns?
Ah - you beat me to it! Japan is indeed the largest market. Japan has about half of the world's radio amateurs! The US has about 25%. The rest of the countries have around 2% or less. -- 73,
By Brian Mury <ve7ngr@...> · #72 ·
Re: FCC approval
My contacts say the radio exists already. We will probably see it under the glass at Dayton 2005 this year. Keith, K4KAL
By Keith LaBorde - K4KAL <k4kal@...> · #71 ·
Re: FCC approval
As the french article said, the picture is taken from the drawing board. I don’t think that the new brick exist in one single copy yet…. /Per _____ Fr?n: chuck maurer
By Per Eriksson <sm4xiu@...> · #70 ·
FCC approval
Has anyone searched the FCC website for documents concerning the approval cycle required by the FCC for type acceptance or whatever they call it. This process takes several months and must be done
By chuck maurer <lomaurer@...> · #69 ·
Re: Past ICOM patterns?
I've heard not long ago that Japan was actually the largest amateur radio market in the world with significantly more amateurs than the US. This might bear looking into. {^_^}
By jdow <jdow@...> · #68 ·
Re: Past ICOM patterns?
By Ken Kinyon <w7ts@...> · #67 ·
Re: Past ICOM patterns?
Probably the FCC thing...
By PA3DUV · #66 ·
Re: Past ICOM patterns?
I agree the the USA is the largest market, but when ICOM launched the Pro3, it is available in Europe several months before here in the USA
By starmike@... · #65 ·
Re: Past ICOM patterns?
I agree the the USA is the largest market, but when ICOM launched the Pro3, it is available in Europe several months before here in the USA
By starmike@... · #64 ·
Re: Announced in Dayton?
Hi Mike, In Europe, the old measures often linger on, but have been rationalised to the metric system. In Germany, one can still buy "ein Pfund" (one pound) of potatoes at the greengrocer's. One
By Adam Farson · #62 ·
Re: Past ICOM patterns?
Check again on that airliner thing. Boeing has announced quite a few sales of its new planes and cited some specifications that basically undercut the AirBus cost per passenger mile. {^_-}
By jdow <jdow@...> · #63 ·
Re: Announced in Dayton?
That's pronbaly because rods can easily be converted to acres; they get paid bt the acre, eh what? Dave, W1DEC
By David Cain <davidca@...> · #60 ·
Re: Past ICOM patterns?
If it's a hoax it's a good one. Concerning the market: I doubt if France is a key market for Icom. To me it looks that the USA is the biggest market for HAM radio gear so one should expect the
By PA3DUV · #59 ·
Re: Announced in Dayton?
We can't ALL start out perfect. {O,o}
By jdow <jdow@...> · #61 ·
Re: Announced in Dayton?
Just a trivial note.. I grew up in West Texas, and my cousin was the County Agricultural Extension Agent... he did, and still does measure crops in rods... Interesting, no? 73 Mike
By Mike Perryman <jmperrym@...> · #58 ·