Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Ft817
- Messages
Search
Re: Chinese FT-817 TCXO?
Christopher,
it seems that here is the Yaesu TCXO-9 still available: so do not bother yourself with Chinese junks... The smaller TCXO case is latest actual version, the bigger one TTSO1NS-P1 package is older one produced in 2018. If you would have problems with purchase in Germany then I am ready to help you. 73 - Petr, OK1RP |
Re: 2m & 70cm FT8 - Frequency stability?
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýMy FT817ND does drift slowly on 2 meres, but this is manageable. I don't use it on 70cms FT8
|
Locked
Re: FT-818 group invitation
Chuck,
be sure that nobody is insulting hospitality of all here. Please do not overdo it... If the 818 group will be shown as unnecessary and useless then it can be cancelled... I did not want to bother others here with specific 818 topics and now I am desperado, ...huh :( 73 - Petr, OK1RP |
Locked
Re: FT-818 group invitation
Chuck Cole K4TZO
I feel the new group is insulting the?hospitality?of all here, and has no reason or purpose or need to be separate. On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 7:35 AM Bob Aldridge <Bob@...> wrote:
|
Re: 2m & 70cm FT8 - Frequency stability?
I have been using an FT817ND as an IF rig for the microwave bands on 144 and 432 MHz. I do not have the TCXO installed. I have never had any problem with its stability or accuracy. 73, Zack W9SZ On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 8:16 AM Christopher Maness <christopher.maness@...> wrote: I have heard you do need the TCXO for VHF/UHF.? I don't think you do for HF as I am running it even with WSPR it seems to work fine on HF.? However, the Chinese knock offs generate more phase noise. |
Chinese FT-817 TCXO?
It looks like the OEM TCXO-9 is out of stock, I am not sure if it is
discontinued or there are just supply chain issues. There are all kinds of Chinese copies of these things for dirt cheap. However, it seems that they increase the noise floor on the receiver. Are there any of these copies that don't do this? Thanks, Chris KQ6UP |
Re: 2m & 70cm FT8 - Frequency stability?
I'm using a FT818. With a transverter?when using QO-100, and a chip SDR to receive. The only problem I never had is with a LNB without TXO...? Trust in it Pietro I2OIM Il giorno gio 13 ott 2022 alle ore 09:36 R P <trunky@...> ha scritto: Does anyone have experience of using the FT-817 on V-UHF FT8? |
Re: Beginner's Guide to HF Operating Live Online Tonight
Trevor Smith
Hi Just found Ur e mail, How do I get the recorded version of last nights meet Pse.. I have already logged it in for the following sessions.. Sincerely Trevor M7BWW? 73 On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 23:11, Anthony Luscre <k8zt73@...> wrote:
|
Locked
Re: FT-818 group invitation
It is not as simple as it looks like Roger...
Except these mentioned changes (lack helical filter on 70cm is shame) realize: - no longer orange light on 818 front panel to indicating battery charging? - no longer high power 5(6)W available on 818 when battery powered + precise TXCO-9 furtunately installed in stock 818 + grounding of the boards / shielding inside 818 is changed to avoid additional noise + 60m band furtunately added to 818 - In menu Option 10, backlight set to AUTO will never actually turning it off on 818?due to the plug being in the DC power barrel socket. ...and other changes compare to 817/817ND 73 - Petr, OK1RP |
2m & 70cm FT8 - Frequency stability?
Does anyone have experience of using the FT-817 on V-UHF FT8?
If so, how do you find the frequency stability? Apparently, for FT8 you would need less than?0.5 Hz/second drift to be successful.? Real experiences appreciated, knowledge of retro-fitted TXCO and GPS devices welcomed :) |
Beginner's Guide to HF Operating Live Online Tonight
Beginner's Guide to HF Operating Co-presenters Dennis Kidder, W6DQ and Anthony Luscre, K8ZT, present a series of three sessions covering aspects of getting on HF for new hams. The sessions will be held live via Zoom on three consecutive Wednesdays- Oct 12, 19 & 26th at 9 PM Eastern / 6 PM Pacific / 01:00 UTC (Thur.) Zoom link-
Passcode: WEDNESDAY
The sessions will also be recorded for later viewing:
Week 1- The HF Bands, Operating & Making Contacts
Week 2- Equipment & Antennas
Week 3- Putting It All Together
Slideshow from the presentations, including clickable links and resources, is available at . Anthony Luscre K8ZT Ohio Section Section Youth Coordinator & Education Outreach ARRL - The National Association For Amateur Radio? ? The Web Resource Hoarder- K8ZT Radio Website- Amateur Radio Resources for Students/Youth - |
Locked
Re: FT-818 group invitation
The only significant difference in design with the FT-818 not yet discussed in this group is the deletion of the helical resonator in the 430 MHz receiver section. This is a fairly expensive part ($10-$20)and unless you have a fairly crowded 70?cm band not essential for good performance. Besides that, there is the improved battery specification, the LCD backlighting colors changing and maximum power output setting being adjusted up to 6W.?
|
FT-817/818 Power Supply
Hi all,
|
Locked
Re: FT-818 group invitation
Simply rename this group to FT817/8 or whatever is acceptable to FB? 73, Leon G1HSM? |
Locked
Re: FT-818 group invitation
Bob,
not at all... no more issues or specific problems on new 818. Please do not look for anything complicated in it. I just thought some of the 818 only topics might be bothersome to other 817/817ND owners so I got an idea to create this group. No urgency, no emergency just enjoy... Most of the items, functions, features etc. are similar or common of course. Maybe it is good idea, maybe not. We will see. 73 - Petr, OK1RP |
Locked
Re: FT-818 group invitation
Chuck Cole K4TZO
Doesn't seem good to dilute and hide info by a pointless subdivision.? A common library for 8177/818 stuff would be good, but we have that now. On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 4:36 AM mick smith <michael.newbury@...> wrote: Picky,, either join it or dont, |
Locked
Re: FT-818 group invitation
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýIf that's the case, might it not be a good idea to have included that information in the original invitation? I have an FT-817, but I do not have an FT-818 so I had assumed
that this new group would not be relevent for me. But I really
do not like assumptions and generally try to verify that
they are correct. However, since the current [FT817] is working
well, I was a bit mystified by the emergence of the dedicated
FT-818 group. I now assume that the FT-818 must be having lots of problems the solution of which are not relevent to FT-817 users. Is that correct? Or, maybe, the FT-818 has numerous features that are absent from the FT-817? Just wondering! Bob On 12/10/2022 10:18, Petr Ourednik
wrote:
|
Locked
Re: FT-818 group invitation
Jeff,
thanks for reply. Simply to not bother 817/817ND users with specific 818 issues or info over here. ...of course there is friendly partnership with this current amazing 817 large group and co-operation is welcomed. Many thanks, 73 - Petr, OK1RP |
Locked
Re: FT-818 group invitation
I joined briefly. It's empty.
This group is already a great place for finding info and asking questions about the 817 and 818.... Why dilute the medicine?? |