On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 7:35 AM Bob Aldridge <Bob@...> wrote:
If that's the case, might it not be a good idea to have included
that information in the original invitation?
I have an FT-817, but I do not have an FT-818 so I had assumed
that this new group would not be relevent for me. But I really
do not like assumptions and generally try to verify that
they are correct. However, since the current [FT817] is working
well, I was a bit mystified by the emergence of the dedicated
FT-818 group.
I now assume that the FT-818 must be having lots of
problems the solution of which are not relevent to FT-817 users.
Is that correct? Or, maybe, the FT-818 has numerous features that
are absent from the FT-817?
Just wondering!
Bob
M0TMT
On 12/10/2022 10:18, Petr Ourednik
wrote:
[Edited Message Follows]
Jeff,
thanks for reply.
Simply to not bother 817/817ND users with specific 818 issues or
info over here.
...of course there is friendly partnership with this current
amazing 817 large group and co-operation is welcomed.
