Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Crestron
- Messages
Search
Re: Will there ever be a time when the DMPS line doesn't suck?
Paul Cunningham
how do you convince a salesman to stop selling DMPS's?1.) Make him help with the next installation 2.) Unbudgeted labor comes out of his commission -----Original Message----- From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of wretaudio Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 11:50 AM To: Crestron@... Subject: [Crestron] Will there ever be a time when the DMPS line doesn't suck? Long compile times, firmware update failures, hardware failures, long boot times, long initialize times, inaccurate feedback, new device databases that make your older programs stop working..............etc., etc., etc., Our sales guys love this box and our installers and programmers can't make them stop selling it. I guess my real question is, how do you convince a salesman to stop selling DMPS's? ------------------------------------ Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers. A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area. Yahoo! Groups Links |
Re: Will there ever be a time when the DMPS line doesn't suck?
I am to the point where I do not believe that any money is saved by the cost savings of there boxes due to the amount of time lost in firmware updating, programming, and debugging. I have lost quite a bit of time recently when a DMPS went bad, so we replaced it, but all of our DSP settings were lost forever, so we had to tune the DSP all over again. We also had to make yet another trip too the job site because we failed to turn phantom power on on the mic inputs, since that setting was lost when we changed out the DMPS's. Every time I use a DMPS, I find another reason to hate these boxes.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., "jbudz1977" <jbudz1977@...> wrote:
|
Re: Will there ever be a time when the DMPS line doesn't suck?
I don't think so... they will always be a pain to work with until they eliminate the uber-module and let us have direct hardware access like we do in a DM-MDXxX.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I'v been pretty annoyed by the database changes, especially the one that made the COM ports stop working - lost hours trying to figure out what was going on, it wasn't until I posted here that the answer was found. The biggest problem with the DMPS is that the box has awesome features for an awesome price, so salespeople will continue to specify it. If you look at the total cost of re-creating a DMPS-300-C using a control processor and a DM8x8 it will be a lot more $$, and you would still need a 3rd party DSP for the mics. Another big problem with the DMPS is that it seems to be very stable once it is programmed and tested, and my customers are very happy with it, ordering more all the time. Maybe tell the salespeople to double their programming estimates with DMPS to account for all the dead time that the unit causes. Personally, I feel major resentment towards Crestron about this box. I have a strong suspicion that the pain that these boxes cause is not necessary, but some manager said "it has to have a front panel" and "it has to have an uber-module to make it 'easy' to program." The most success I've had with these is in cookie-cutter rooms, it's not so bad to configure and upload to one of these, I can usually get it done in about an hour or so. --- In Crestron@..., "wretaudio" <wretaudio@...> wrote:
|
Will there ever be a time when the DMPS line doesn't suck?
Long compile times, firmware update failures, hardware failures, long boot times, long initialize times, inaccurate feedback, new device databases that make your older programs stop working..............etc., etc., etc.,
Our sales guys love this box and our installers and programmers can't make them stop selling it. I guess my real question is, how do you convince a salesman to stop selling DMPS's? |
2-series error log - Autonomics - "Could not allocate local storage"
So I'm having this ongoing problem controlling a Mirage Media Server. I'm using their newest module (3.1) and a Pro2. After a week-10 days of uptime, the following error pops up and the Pro2 stops communicating with the Mirage:
Error: Module S-4.5.15.2.1:S-24 : S2_Autonomic_MMS_IP_Processor_v3_1 at line 1538: Could not allocate local storage. Terminating TimeStamp: 14:18:48 12-25-12 UpTime: 10 days 00:21:18.54 Task: S07700b I'm a noob when it comes to programming, but I have done several projects integrating the Mirage and haven't run into this problem before. This is an older project that I didn't program originally. I'm simply adding this as a source. The program is stored on the CF card, not sure if that has anything to do with it. Any advice would be great! |
Re: Honeywell HRDP series DVR
Guys Help !!!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
i really need help with this i have a big project that i am working with and i need the RS232 commands for this DVR or if someone had developed this module that would be great. Medo --- In Crestron@..., Chris Erskine <chris@...> wrote:
|
Re: D3 Scheduler
Missed the D3 in the topic. To answer Heath's question, yes you can modify
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
the schedule file without rebuilding and reloading the program. You would grab the schedule file off the processor using File Manager and then edit the text file, then reload it back to the same location and reboot the processor. Mark On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Gregg M <jets_in_2003@...> wrote:
** |
Re: MTX-3 or PTX-3 rebooting late at night.
m76jc
Tony is right. It also resets based on the processor time so if your time is not set right in the processor it could reset earlier or later.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., "Tony Golden" <mrgolden@...> wrote:
|
Re: D3 Scheduler
Thanks but I just ended up running it through a variable
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., Heath Volmer <hvolmer@...> wrote:
|
Re: D3 Scheduler
Yes, just run the output of the event from the event scheduler into an AND
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
and use the button feedback to enable the other input of the AND, then run the AND into a OS or WPULSE. Mark On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Gregg M <jets_in_2003@...> wrote:
** |
Re: XBMC not giving thumbnails with MC3 and SystemBuilder
--- In Crestron@..., "dtxmatt" <matt@...> wrote:
Bump, still looking for any success stories. Thanks. |
Mestro Shied
gsusmood
Guys greeting on this Holidays!
I have to program some 25 Shutters via Maestro Shield, As far as I been browsing in their web site, this is what i came with: Configuration Commands UX (U1-U15) Latches motor X to move up DX (D1-D15) Latches motor X to move down SX(S1-S15) StopsmotorX Channel 15 is an ALL channel and will move all motors at the same time E.g.: - U5 = Motor 5 will begin moving up. What symbol should I use with this a SIO? |
Re: Christmas 2013
LOL!!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Oops. Just a little typo. The bad part is I had not even had any Christmas spirits at that point. :) --- In Crestron@..., Phil Bridges <gravityhammer@...> wrote:
|
Re: MTX-3 or PTX-3 rebooting late at night.
FYI, the latest TPMC-3X firmware Release Notes states the panel will perform a
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
"maintenance mode" (i.e., reboot) at 2 AM every day, if it's not in use at the time. Although it's not mentioned in the MTX-3's Release Notes, I'd be surprised if the same didn't apply. --- on Tuesday, December 25, 2012 at 6:03 PM, LENREX wrote: |
Re: Pakedge Reliability
jgreenink16
I don't like that the poe switch interfaces are only correct in IE, but I just use chrome or firefox anyway and deal with the mis-alignment. The interfaces may be a little slow, but I don't find them to be any slower than any other manufacturer's interfaces for managed equipment. There are quirks with the stuff, but it's still so much better than any other solution unless you outsource it.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., "floyd1212" <floyd1212@...> wrote:
|
Re: prodigy mc3
metdeathx
Should be fine as long as you don't plan to add a lot of Crestron gear to the system. I had a good bit of stuff controlled by my PMC3.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I had an Xbox 360, a HTPC, Sony Blu-Ray changer, TV, Home Theater receiver, PS3, PS2, Roku all hooked up and controlled using IR spliters and other little "hacks" The only other problem you may run into is if you don't have the Mobile Pro app, your TP file may run over the free size limit. --- In Crestron@..., Paul Mclean <horsis139@...> wrote:
|
Re: Ethernet Intersystem Communication question (yay!... right?)
metdeathx
The Prodigy stuff is on hand, and I really only need it to do some small stuff. As far as the EIC, it's just control a BDP-7000ES, a Roku, and serial switcher. Granted, I have to wait until next demo dollars to make some changes to fully use all of that stuff (need and 8x2).
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., "LENREX" <lenrex@...> wrote:
|
Re: Crestron 2 series processor
horsis139
--- In Crestron@..., "steve_advanced" <maverick2112@...> wrote:
i have an older CP2 it is in use but I will be replacing as soon as I finish new one |
prodigy mc3
Paul Mclean
I am not new to Crestron but
?I am new to doing myself? Have been paying others to do this for 10 years? My turn now? Any way I bought prodigy PMC3 (hope that was not a mistake) intent is: ?control for theater with I-pad? replacing older cp2 (no ethernet) no access to software programmer died have? vutec on relay direct tv ?(IR) blue ray ?(IR) sony str d2es (IR) JVC DLAX 90 ?(iR ?) graffic eye 4 button (serial) Is this going to work? will graffic eye integrate on serial or is that prodigy only Thank You Paul AHT PHX AZ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss