I don't like that the poe switch interfaces are only correct in IE, but I just use chrome or firefox anyway and deal with the mis-alignment. The interfaces may be a little slow, but I don't find them to be any slower than any other manufacturer's interfaces for managed equipment. There are quirks with the stuff, but it's still so much better than any other solution unless you outsource it.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., "floyd1212" <floyd1212@...> wrote:
For the most part we have had few problems with the hardware. We did have a PoE switch that lost its configuration (with VLANs) twice. But it hasn't happened again.
My only other gripe is that the web interfaces to configure the WAPs and the switches is painfully slow and does not render properly in all browsers. The interface for the routers (re-badged Fortinets) is much better.
--- In Crestron@..., "jgreenink16" <jgreenink16@> wrote:
I have to chime in here as well and report nothing but good things about pakedge. I've worked with them directly on a lot of things and they're all very helpful. What issues are you having?
--- In Crestron@..., "m.nguyen" <mpninc@> wrote:
We have been using pakedge as well and it been pretty solid aside from the
issue with ps3 with virtual cell.
On Dec 22, 2012 5:22 PM, "Kris" <kris.k@> wrote:
**
Never had hardware issues. Only issues with improper setup, wiring or
implementation. Got to love IT issues!
--- In Crestron@..., "Bill Karlis" <vkarlisc@> wrote:
Hello All :-)
For our crestron IT backbone, we've been using Pakedge routers,
switches, access points and their virtual kit lately.
Occasionally, we seem to be having network issues at clients homes and
apartments. Its not often but does seem to happen.
I am trying to narrow it down whether its a problem on our side with
running wires / terminating ends properly etc.
Has anyone else had hardware issues with Pakedge gear?
Thanks in advance,
Bill
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
