开云体育

If the remotes work fine when the power is disconnected from the lights I would make sure that you dont have a dimmer with the same ID as one of the remotes then I would kill the dimmers one at a time

Yup. It expects the string to be checksummmed to arrive whole, and then deals however many bytes are in that serial signal. Having the string arrive in pieces would require extra logic, but should be

Check for wifi interference, If around you is only using channel 1,6,11 then mesh channels 15,20,25,26 are good. If you have a wap on 2-5, 15 is no good If you have one on 7-10, then 20 is no good. If

What could be misconfigured? I would try cresnet to the gateway if possible but it isnt. However, I have everything configured by IP. The two devices are even on the same switch. Im stopping by there

I don't have a solution, but I have an MC3 with a client on port 23 talking to my Marantz receiver. It never had an issue. TB

Yup!

NMT has static DHCP - so no DNS involved mark

you don't find out until you talk to NEC engineers that they often OEN their control chips from mitsubishi. i.e. I once had to use mistsubishi protocol to wake NEC displays up after which their

I'm assuming his media tank is on his LAN, so DNS wouldn't come in to play - and if it had been the culprit he would have gotten the failed DNS value. -5 is "connection broken locally", which I

I'll have to dig out the specifics if requested, but a congress mic system I did ages ago required an 8-bit polynomial CRC. It was bad enough that I couldn't understand their syntax for the

I'm told that there is a set of 3-series compatible modules available at the Lutron Homeworks site if you have a sign-in there... - Chip

Did that account for messages of varying lengths? - Chip

I'm guessing your jumper wasn't in the form of a DB-9 connector with pins 2&3 permanently jumpered together then? Mine is - and when I plug it in to a cable that's been wired "180 degrees out of

Extron - whose gear is normally a dream to talk with - makes me scratch my head sometimes trying to figure out what they were thinking. -> +V <- Vol98 -> -V <- Vol97 -> V <- 97 WTF. WHY?!?!?! -> V <-

+1 -- Marc-Etienne HUNEAU http://www.dsr.fr ? 06.615.516.90

Perhaps if you'd built a checksum into your counting algorithm, you would have noticed right away that the number was wrong :) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thanks Dave! I would appreciate it if you could either load the new updated modules to the files section or email them to me etienne at be-in-control dot co dot za I'm not going to provide the user

Conflicting/Duplicate RFID's ?

I had a batch that were numbered incorrectly several years ago as well. But I'm not sure why removing the hood would solve your problem, maybe I'm misreading that part. Must be using the 'old school'

Using host names and didn't enter DNS?