Perhaps if you'd built a checksum into your counting algorithm, you would
have noticed right away that the number was wrong :)
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Kool-Aid Drinker <crug@...
wrote:
**
Make that 51 symbols. Counting always kills me. ;-)
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:27:56 -0600, Kool-Aid Drinker
<crug@...> wrote:
CRC checksums suck. Non-standard ones suck hard.
Only took 41 symbols for a basic version of the checksum that started
the thread.
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 22:24:06 -0000, "erikm_101" <erikm101@...>
wrote:
OK, I'll bite....what are some examples of candidates for "worst
checksum ever" ??
--- In Crestron@..., Kool-Aid Drinker <crug@...> wrote:
Unnecessary, yes. Worst checksum ever, hardly.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
