开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
FT-847 power switch
The power switch on my FT-847 is starting to have issues and while I am in the process of locating where to have it replaced, is it advisable to use the power supply to turn the rig on and off? Thanks
By Mitchel W2NEC · #752 ·
Re: FT847 on digi
Hi Hal, this is a circuit I use for all sorts of data modes, this one I made for my Clansman kit. The circuit is always the same just the wiring details change, it's cheap and easy to make. Leighton.
By gw3fsp · #751 ·
Re: FT847 on digi
Thanks for all the replies. Helps lots. 73/Hal. WB4AEG
By Hal Dale · #750 ·
Re: FT847 on digi
Hi all, Please see attached what I use, no problems to report. 73, Jorge Em ter., 16 de mai. de 2023 às 19:41, Hal Dale <wb4aeg@...> escreveu: -- *** Help us to save energy &
By Jorge Lopes · #749 ·
Re: FT847 on digi
Hi Spence Thanks for your reply. It's funny you should mention using an optocoupler. The one I originally built for my FT-100 back then and still use for my FT-817 uses a 4N25 optocoupler for PTT
By Ian M · #748 ·
Re: FT847 on digi
The ext Speaker option is used if you find using the low level Line Input on your sound card doesn't have enough to drive the software (mainly SSTV from what I remember) as opposed to using the
By Ian M · #747 ·
Re: FT847 on digi
Nice interface, Ian. Curious, why use the external speaker jack, given that its output is dependent on the front panel volume control and subject to being mis-set? There is a fixed level
By Greg D · #746 ·
Re: FT847 on digi
I have an early FT-847 sitting on 40.680 FT8 right now. I've also used it on 2M with no problems. 432 is a bit of a problem as my Ft-847 is off by about 1.7khz on 432. This is far enough away from
By K6EU · #745 ·
Re: FT847 on digi
Oh Yes I love that interface. Ian’s nice design is Similar to mine which was a 600:600 transformer and 1k:8 ohm much like the pdf. I think I also used a 2N2222 and used it to drive a 2N33
By Spence G5STO · #744 ·
Re: FT847 on digi
Hi Please find attached the Sound Card interface circuit diagram which I have used for the past 20 years. Works all mode all bands, and was originally designed by the guys who wrote W95SSTV and
By Ian M · #743 ·
Re: FT847 on digi
What Spence said, I would add that the 847 was built back when doing "data" communication on HF involved different "TNC" equipment than VHF, so (I presume) they designed it to
By Greg D · #742 ·
Re: FT847 on digi
Yes and WSPR and JT65HF. Also recently used on GreenCube but a lot of hassle due to GreenCube being simplex and the FT847 having to work doppler shifting and split on the same band. Very tricky to
By Spence G5STO · #741 ·
FT847 on digi
Has anyone used the 847 on FT4/8 or other digi modes on 2M and 432?? Hal/WB4AEG
By Hal Dale · #740 ·
Re: test
test uspeo суб, 29. апр 2023. у 18:59 YU7MS <yu7ms@...> ?е написао/ла:
By Bane YU7KB · #739 ·
Re: test
It works Sent: 29 April 2023 16:44 To: FT-847 Subject: [YaesuFT847] test test -- 73 Mi?ka YU7MS <mailto:yu7ms@...> mailto:yu7ms@... See you on the rocks... The band is
By Andrew Lenton · #738 ·
test
test -- 73 Mi?ka YU7MS ? ? ? ? ? ? mailto:yu7ms@... See you on the rocks... The band is never dead! www.yt7c.org.rs?
By YU7MS · #737 ·
Re: 60 Meter Transmit Mod Info Wanted
The 48 Mhz is way before the PA. I forget the exact figure, but it was not many dB down from the 70 Mhz signal
By Andy Bosworth · #736 ·
Re: 60 Meter Transmit Mod Info Wanted
The pre amp mod that replaces the 4 m borad is no longer available, I have the Gerber files and a few boards made. All the parts are surface mount, there is one mc109 coil for tuning. This mod brings
By Andrew Lenton · #735 ·
Re: 60 Meter Transmit Mod Info Wanted
The 60 metre mod is easily done by simply widebanding the radio. 60 metres is not in the processor, as 60 metres was not thought of when the radio was new. Ref 4 metres, I looked in to doing the mods,
By Andy Bosworth · #734 ·
Re: 60 Meter Transmit Mod Info Wanted
HI, how are you getting on with the information for your mod information requested? It seems to have stopped are you having it done? Are you going to do it yourself? Is there anybody who is willing
By Jeff M0UHF · #733 ·