Re: 10nF leadless ceramic capacitor
Oops that should 1nF - not 10pF
Regards, David Partridge
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of David C. Partridge Sent: 21 January 2012 12:21 To: TekScopes@...; TekScopes2@... Subject: [TekScopes] 10pF leadless ceramic capacitor
As reported in an earlier post the metallisation on the top surface of the leadless capacitor C816 on the trigger board came off when I unsoldered the arming and output TDs in my 7T11. I've improvised for now with some copper foil on the top surface, but I really need to replace it.
This is a completely leadless 10pF ceramic capacitor about 3/8" square, Tektronix part number 283-0253-00
Where can I get something like this??? None of the distributors seem to have leadless disc ceramics.
Dave
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
10pF leadless ceramic capacitor
As reported in an earlier post the metallisation on the top surface of the leadless capacitor C816 on the trigger board came off when I unsoldered the arming and output TDs in my 7T11. I've improvised for now with some copper foil on the top surface, but I really need to replace it.
This is a completely leadless 10pF ceramic capacitor about 3/8" square, Tektronix part number 283-0253-00
Where can I get something like this??? None of the distributors seem to have leadless disc ceramics.
Dave
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Tan: ? ? ? ? I beg your pardon, I did not realize that you definitely do have the basic skills! ?But do buy or build an ESR meter, as a great number of ?problems are caused by defective electrolytics and they are very easily checked in circuit with the ESR meter. It just takes a few minutes to rule out this very common failure and then you can continue with further circuit diagnosis/analysis as required. But believe me, caps are a BIG problem and your "technician life" ?will go a lot smoother with an ESR meter--it sure has for me (I've been using one for almost 30 years and I still remember how it was before I got one)!! ?I read some time ago that about around 90-95% of electrolytics fail due to high ESR. Don't know if this is a legitimate figure but it
speaks for itself. Good luck. ? ? ? ? Terry
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: Tan Chor Ming To: TekScopes@... Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 11:01 PM Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
?
Thanks Gary ,
Do you suspect that it¡¯s a cap ESR issue?
Why would it cause such a behaviour?
I believe you can infer a lot from the
behaviour than blind guesses that¡¯s where I am trying to tap from the
experienced engineers.
?
I suppose I have more than the basic
knowledge because I am an electronics engineer with working knowledge in vacuum
and solid state electronics.
I have built a scope from scratch, otherwise
I would not attempt so work with EHT.
?
Rgds,
Chor Ming
From: TekScopes@... [mailto: TekScopes@... ] On Behalf Of Terry Gray
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012
1:11 AM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power
supply problem with Tek 2220
?
?
At least
check the incircuit power supply electrolytic capacitors for ESR. If you don't
have an ESR tester, buy one or build one. There is lots of ESR information on
the web and also in the archives of this yahoo group. ?You definitely need
one if you're considering working on this type of electronic equipment and
problems. Otherwise give the problem to someone else who has this essential
test equipment and basic electronic knowledge to assist in diagnosing your
problem. You are over your head without basic skills and test equipment.
?
From: Tan Chor Ming
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012
8:45 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power
supply problem with Tek 2220
?
?
Has
anyone seen this behaviour repairing Tek2000 series scope power supply?
1. When
power on from cold, it will fire up properly and stay on for a few minutes
2.?
Once it warms up, the power supply shut down and try to on again and it
continues in this on/off mode
3.?
Pre-regulator out = 43V? (between TP940 and TP950)
4.?
All voltages when the unit is stable for a few minutes are +8.6, -8.6, +5.2,
+100 are all ok.
What
are likely problems before I start ripping the components from the circuit?
?ttesenq@... suggested that
it could be the pre-regulator MOSFET P9070.
I
though that it could be a electrolytic cap but it doe not look likely because
electrolytic failure would not have allowed the unit to fire up for a few
minutes
It is
more likely a active component that weaken with increase temperature, so ttesenq@... could be
right.?
This
would mean Q947 and Q946 are also likely components
Any
other possible lead of similar experience.
?
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Thanks for your answer.
Pertaining to the voltage measurement on R907
but I still need to know what to expect to know if an overload has happened.
Nothing usually hot, other than the common
heatsink for Q908 ,Q947, Q948
?
Rgds,
Cho Ming
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Thomas Miller
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012
1:02 PM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply
problem with Tek 2220
?
?
Why put an ammeter in series with the resistor? Just measure the
voltage across it and do ohms law. If you are not certain of the resistor
value, lift one end and use your ohmmeter to check it.
Does anything get excessively hot after it shuts down?
As to an isolation transformer, look for something around 500 VA so you
will not burn it up in the event of a fault. You want to be able to blow the
fuse if the supply is bad. Be sure you have the correct fuse based on your
supply voltage.
Anyway, good luck and let us know how it goes.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, January
20, 2012 11:37 PM
Subject: RE: [TekScopes]
Power supply problem with Tek 2220
?
Thank you Tom for taking the time to point out specifically the
likely cause of the problem.
I know it takes effort to go through the details and I really appreciate
it.
Just to let you know where I come from, so that there is
less to assume.
I am an electronics engineer from Singapore
above 50 so very much familiar with vacuum and solid state electronics.
I do not have the schematics for 2220 so like you I am assuming it
is quite similar to 2235 which I have it downloaded.
I have both 2220 and 2235 and there appear to be quite similar
though the PCB layout is slightly different.?
I have complete understanding of how the power supply works.
Pre-regulator - PWM driving Q908 to produce +43V across TP940 and
TP950
Final Regulator ¨C DC-DC push-pull inverter through Q947 and
Q946.
I have another scope 2235, unfortunately, it too went down
at the same time, so the only instrument I have is a multimeter.
Anyway, I do not have an isolation transformer so even with the
2235 working, I will need to get an isolation transformer before I could take
any measurement.
Any idea what VA rating is needed for the isolation transformer?
Based on the power needs, it appears to be at least 200VA.
Initially, I was asking about R907, not because I was
suspecting the resistor but I intend to check the load current by putting an
ammeter in series with the resistor.
For that to be useful I need to know what is expected.? Like
you. I am suspecting that the voltage at R907 has gone up after the set warms
up thus shutting down U930. ?
I will probably go with the cap changes you have recommended
since I have some time during the Lunar New Year break.?
Unfortunately, I do not have ESR meter, but I don¡¯t think
that a big issue just replacing the caps.
I am aware of the direct 43Vdc injection, but thank you for
telling me the detail that Q908 needs to be disconnected.
Unfortunately, I do not have a power supply with this voltage
output.? I only have a power supply of 18V max 2A.? So I will have to
hold off this approach.
One more thing which I did not mention earlier is that I
detached the +5.2V connection to the digital board (for the storage function of
2220) and behaviour remains unchanged.
Rgds,
Chor Ming
From: TekScopes@...
[mailto:TekScopes@...]
On Behalf Of tom jobe
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012
7:30 AM
To: TekScopes
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power
supply problem with Tek 2220
?
I saw your
2220 question the first time you posted it a few days ago, and I
did not have a nice short answer for you. Since you have not gotten the
answer
you were looking for, let me comment a bit on this.
First off, I don't own a 2220 or have the service manual for it, and none of
the download sites I checked seem to have it either, including
ArtekMedia.com having it for purchase. So I will assume it is similar to the
better 22xx's such as the 2235, at least around the power supply. I will
also assume that you do have a service manual to work with. U930 monitors
the voltage drop across R907, and in your case it probably thinks the
current is too high after a few minutes, so it shuts down.
I have worked on lots of 22xx scopes and I have not seen the value of R907
drift and cause this problem, but others have reported that as a
possibility. Odds are, that this is not your problem.
An over current situation can be caused by anything after R907 within the
inverter, the transformer itself or on the secondary side of the main
transformer.
How you go about finding the problem depends on what equipment you have
available, and what your testing preferences might be.
If you don't have much to work with, just start changing components. In my
experience the components in the right rear corner of the mainboard cause
the most grief so I would start there with C925, C942 and C943. If you have
some decent soldering equipment you can change all three capacitors quickly
without removing the mainboard.
If you have access to an ESR meter you could check all of the aluminum
electrolytic capacitors in circuit. Most of the electrolytics give no
trouble, especially the six(?) 840 uF caps in front of the heat sink for
Q9070 (but you would want to check all of the electrolytic caps if you had
an ESR meter handy).
Another approach would be to put in the 43 volts DC from an external power
source until something got hot or went up in smoke. If your power supply
allowed you to adjust the current limit you could sneak up on it and just
get the problem part(s) nice and warm. You will need to at least disconnect
Q9070 when you apply the external 43 VDC at TP940 and TP 950 from the bottom
or top of the mainboard. I lightly tack on two wires to the bottom side to
make the 43 VDC connections. You can use the scope in its normal way when it
is powered with the external 43 VDC.
The external 43 VDC idea came from a fine Tekscopes member named Hakan, many
years ago, and he has an excellent document you should read at:
A couple of years ago I made up a document listing some commonly available
components you might use to replace some of the original Tektronix part
numbers that often fail. I can send you that directly or you can find it in
the Tekscopes Message archive if you like.
Another thing you might do is take resistance readings from chassis ground
to each of the voltage test points before you get very far into this repair
(with the scope not connected to the mains of course!).
There are lots of other ideas to add to this, but this should get you
started.
This will be a simple fix, so just take your time and understand what you
are doing.
tom jobe...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tan Chor Ming" <jonray03@...>
To: <TekScopes@...>
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
> Has anyone seen this behaviour repairing Tek2000 series scope power
supply?
>
>
>
> Behaviour
>
> 1. When power on from cold, it will fire up properly and stay on for a few
> minutes
>
> 2. Once it warms up, the power supply shut down and try to on again and
it
> continues in this on/off mode
>
> 3. Pre-regulator out = 43V (between TP940 and TP950)
>
> 4. All voltages when the unit is stable for a few minutes are +8.6, -8.6,
> +5.2, +100 are all ok.
>
>
>
> What are likely problems before I start ripping the components from the
> circuit?
>
>
>
> ttesenq@...
suggested that it could be the pre-regulator MOSFET
> P9070.
>
>
>
> I though that it could be a electrolytic cap but it doe not look likely
> because electrolytic failure would not have allowed the unit to fire up
for
> a few minutes
>
> It is more likely a active component that weaken with increase
temperature,
> so ttesenq@...
could be right.
>
> This would mean Q947 and Q946 are also likely components
>
>
>
> Any other possible lead of similar experience.
>
>
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Why put an ammeter in series with the resistor? Just measure the voltage
across it and do ohms law. If you are not certain of the resistor value, lift
one end and use your ohmmeter to check it.
?
Does anything get excessively hot after it shuts down?
?
As to an isolation transformer, look for something around 500 VA so you
will not burn it up in the event of a fault. You want to be able to blow the
fuse if the supply is bad. Be sure you have the correct fuse based on your
supply voltage.
?
Anyway, good luck and let us know how it goes.
?
Regards,
Tom M (the other tom)
?
?
?
?
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 11:37
PM
Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Power supply
problem with Tek 2220
?
Thank you Tom for
taking the time to point out specifically the likely cause of the
problem.
I know it takes
effort to go through the details and I really appreciate
it.
Just to let you know
where I come from, so that there is less to assume.
I am an electronics
engineer from Singapore above 50 so very much familiar
with vacuum and solid state electronics.
I do not have the
schematics for 2220 so like you I am assuming it is quite similar to 2235
which I have it downloaded.
I have both 2220 and
2235 and there appear to be quite similar though the PCB layout is slightly
different.?
I have complete
understanding of how the power supply works.
Pre-regulator - PWM
driving Q908 to produce +43V across TP940 and TP950
Final Regulator ¨C
DC-DC push-pull inverter through Q947 and Q946.
I have another scope
2235, unfortunately, it too went down at the same time, so the only instrument
I have is a multimeter.
Anyway, I do not have
an isolation transformer so even with the 2235 working, I will need to get an
isolation transformer before I could take any
measurement.
Any idea what VA
rating is needed for the isolation transformer?
Based on the power
needs, it appears to be at least 200VA.
Initially, I was
asking about R907, not because I was suspecting the resistor but I intend to
check the load current by putting an ammeter in series with the
resistor.
For that to be useful
I need to know what is expected.? Like you. I am suspecting that the
voltage at R907 has gone up after the set warms up thus shutting down U930.
?
I will probably go
with the cap changes you have recommended since I have some time during the
Lunar New Year break.?
Unfortunately, I do
not have ESR meter, but I don¡¯t think that a big issue just replacing the
caps.
I am aware of the
direct 43Vdc injection, but thank you for telling me the detail that Q908
needs to be disconnected.
Unfortunately, I do
not have a power supply with this voltage output.? I only have a power
supply of 18V max 2A.? So I will have to hold off this
approach.
One more thing which
I did not mention earlier is that I detached the +5.2V connection to the
digital board (for the storage function of 2220) and behaviour remains
unchanged.
Rgds,
Chor
Ming
From:
TekScopes@...
[mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of tom jobe Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 7:30
AM To: TekScopes Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply
problem with Tek 2220
?
I saw
your 2220 question the first time you posted it a few days ago, and I did
not have a nice short answer for you. Since you have not gotten
the answer you were looking for, let me comment a bit on this. First
off, I don't own a 2220 or have the service manual for it, and none of the
download sites I checked seem to have it either, including ArtekMedia.com
having it for purchase. So I will assume it is similar to the better 22xx's
such as the 2235, at least around the power supply. I will also assume that
you do have a service manual to work with. U930 monitors the voltage drop
across R907, and in your case it probably thinks the current is too high
after a few minutes, so it shuts down. I have worked on lots of 22xx scopes
and I have not seen the value of R907 drift and cause this problem, but
others have reported that as a possibility. Odds are, that this is not your
problem. An over current situation can be caused by anything after R907
within the inverter, the transformer itself or on the secondary side of the
main transformer. How you go about finding the problem depends on what
equipment you have available, and what your testing preferences might
be. If you don't have much to work with, just start changing components. In
my experience the components in the right rear corner of the mainboard
cause the most grief so I would start there with C925, C942 and C943. If
you have some decent soldering equipment you can change all three
capacitors quickly without removing the mainboard. If you have access to
an ESR meter you could check all of the aluminum electrolytic capacitors in
circuit. Most of the electrolytics give no trouble, especially the six(?)
840 uF caps in front of the heat sink for Q9070 (but you would want to
check all of the electrolytic caps if you had an ESR meter
handy). Another approach would be to put in the 43 volts DC from an
external power source until something got hot or went up in smoke. If your
power supply allowed you to adjust the current limit you could sneak up on
it and just get the problem part(s) nice and warm. You will need to at
least disconnect Q9070 when you apply the external 43 VDC at TP940 and TP
950 from the bottom or top of the mainboard. I lightly tack on two wires to
the bottom side to make the 43 VDC connections. You can use the scope in
its normal way when it is powered with the external 43 VDC. The external
43 VDC idea came from a fine Tekscopes member named Hakan, many years ago,
and he has an excellent document you should read at:
A
couple of years ago I made up a document listing some commonly
available components you might use to replace some of the original
Tektronix part numbers that often fail. I can send you that directly or you
can find it in the Tekscopes Message archive if you like. Another thing
you might do is take resistance readings from chassis ground to each of the
voltage test points before you get very far into this repair (with the
scope not connected to the mains of course!). There are lots of other ideas
to add to this, but this should get you started. This will be a simple
fix, so just take your time and understand what you are doing. tom
jobe...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tan Chor Ming" <jonray03@...> To:
<TekScopes@...> Sent:
Friday, January 20, 2012 6:45 AM Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply
problem with Tek 2220
> Has anyone seen this behaviour repairing
Tek2000 series scope power supply? > > > >
Behaviour > > 1. When power on from cold, it will fire up properly
and stay on for a few > minutes > > 2. Once it warms up, the
power supply shut down and try to on again and it > continues in this
on/off mode > > 3. Pre-regulator out = 43V (between TP940 and
TP950) > > 4. All voltages when the unit is stable for a few
minutes are +8.6, -8.6, > +5.2, +100 are all
ok. > > > > What are likely problems before I start
ripping the components from the >
circuit? > > > > ttesenq@... suggested that
it could be the pre-regulator MOSFET >
P9070. > > > > I though that it could be a
electrolytic cap but it doe not look likely > because electrolytic
failure would not have allowed the unit to fire up for > a few
minutes > > It is more likely a active component that weaken with
increase temperature, > so ttesenq@... could be
right. > > This would mean Q947 and Q946 are also likely
components > > > > Any other possible lead of similar
experience. > >
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Thanks Gary,
Do you suspect that it¡¯s a cap ESR issue?
Why would it cause such a behaviour?
I believe you can infer a lot from the
behaviour than blind guesses that¡¯s where I am trying to tap from the
experienced engineers.
?
I suppose I have more than the basic
knowledge because I am an electronics engineer with working knowledge in vacuum
and solid state electronics.
I have built a scope from scratch, otherwise
I would not attempt so work with EHT.
?
Rgds,
Chor Ming
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Terry Gray
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012
1:11 AM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power
supply problem with Tek 2220
?
?
At least
check the incircuit power supply electrolytic capacitors for ESR. If you don't
have an ESR tester, buy one or build one. There is lots of ESR information on
the web and also in the archives of this yahoo group. ?You definitely need
one if you're considering working on this type of electronic equipment and
problems. Otherwise give the problem to someone else who has this essential
test equipment and basic electronic knowledge to assist in diagnosing your
problem. You are over your head without basic skills and test equipment.
?
From: Tan Chor Ming
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012
8:45 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power
supply problem with Tek 2220
?
?
Has
anyone seen this behaviour repairing Tek2000 series scope power supply?
1. When
power on from cold, it will fire up properly and stay on for a few minutes
2.?
Once it warms up, the power supply shut down and try to on again and it
continues in this on/off mode
3.?
Pre-regulator out = 43V? (between TP940 and TP950)
4.?
All voltages when the unit is stable for a few minutes are +8.6, -8.6, +5.2,
+100 are all ok.
What
are likely problems before I start ripping the components from the circuit?
?ttesenq@... suggested that
it could be the pre-regulator MOSFET P9070.
I
though that it could be a electrolytic cap but it doe not look likely because
electrolytic failure would not have allowed the unit to fire up for a few
minutes
It is
more likely a active component that weaken with increase temperature, so ttesenq@... could be
right.?
This
would mean Q947 and Q946 are also likely components
Any
other possible lead of similar experience.
?
|
David,
I agree with Jerry---You don't need an isolation transformer to work on this scope. T801 provides all of the isolation necessary.
I still beleive that you need to concentrate on the +50V supply. Can you measure and post the voltages on driver transistors Q869 and Q872. I'm thinking one of those may be open, since you measured about -10V at the base of Q874. Most likely Q872. Be careful and try not to slip with your probe and short out something.
If you have time, posting Q860 voltages may help too.
Jimmy
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., Jerry Massengale <jmassen418a@...> wrote: Hi
Allow me to offer a different opinion on this isolation matter. I worked on a 7D13 with an isolated(floating) section this weeikend. I used my isolation gear so that I could tie my scope ground(common) to the floating common. In such cases isolation is desirable. In the 7603, the power supply transformer provides all the isolation you need. Using another level of isolation allows the 7603's chassis to float and that is not good. It is an unneeded safety hazard.
Jerry Massengale jmassen418a@...
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Thank you Tom for taking the time to point
out specifically the likely cause of the problem.
I know it takes effort to go through the
details and I really appreciate it.
?
Just to let you know where I come from, so
that there is less to assume.
I am an electronics engineer from Singapore above
50 so very much familiar with vacuum and solid state electronics.
I do not have the schematics for 2220 so like
you I am assuming it is quite similar to 2235 which I have it downloaded.
I have both 2220 and 2235 and there appear
to be quite similar though the PCB layout is slightly different.?
I have complete understanding of how the
power supply works.
Pre-regulator - PWM driving Q908 to
produce +43V across TP940 and TP950
Final Regulator ¨C DC-DC push-pull
inverter through Q947 and Q946.
?
I have another scope 2235, unfortunately,
it too went down at the same time, so the only instrument I have is a
multimeter.
Anyway, I do not have an isolation
transformer so even with the 2235 working, I will need to get an isolation
transformer before I could take any measurement.
Any idea what VA rating is needed for the
isolation transformer?
Based on the power needs, it appears to be
at least 200VA.
?
Initially, I was asking about R907, not
because I was suspecting the resistor but I intend to check the load current by
putting an ammeter in series with the resistor.
For that to be useful I need to know what
is expected.? Like you. I am suspecting that the voltage at R907 has gone
up after the set warms up thus shutting down U930. ?
?
I will probably go with the cap changes
you have recommended since I have some time during the Lunar New Year break.?
Unfortunately, I do not have ESR meter,
but I don¡¯t think that a big issue just replacing the caps.
?
I am aware of the direct 43Vdc injection,
but thank you for telling me the detail that Q908 needs to be disconnected.
Unfortunately, I do not have a power
supply with this voltage output.? I only have a power supply of 18V max 2A.?
So I will have to hold off this approach.
?
One more thing which I did not mention
earlier is that I detached the +5.2V connection to the digital board (for the
storage function of 2220) and behaviour remains unchanged.
?
Rgds,
Chor Ming
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of tom jobe
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012
7:30 AM
To: TekScopes
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power
supply problem with Tek 2220
?
?
I saw your 2220 question the first time you posted it
a few days ago, and I
did not have a nice short answer for you. Since you have not gotten the
answer
you were looking for, let me comment a bit on this.
First off, I don't own a 2220 or have the service manual for it, and none of
the download sites I checked seem to have it either, including
ArtekMedia.com having it for purchase. So I will assume it is similar to the
better 22xx's such as the 2235, at least around the power supply. I will
also assume that you do have a service manual to work with. U930 monitors
the voltage drop across R907, and in your case it probably thinks the
current is too high after a few minutes, so it shuts down.
I have worked on lots of 22xx scopes and I have not seen the value of R907
drift and cause this problem, but others have reported that as a
possibility. Odds are, that this is not your problem.
An over current situation can be caused by anything after R907 within the
inverter, the transformer itself or on the secondary side of the main
transformer.
How you go about finding the problem depends on what equipment you have
available, and what your testing preferences might be.
If you don't have much to work with, just start changing components. In my
experience the components in the right rear corner of the mainboard cause
the most grief so I would start there with C925, C942 and C943. If you have
some decent soldering equipment you can change all three capacitors quickly
without removing the mainboard.
If you have access to an ESR meter you could check all of the aluminum
electrolytic capacitors in circuit. Most of the electrolytics give no
trouble, especially the six(?) 840 uF caps in front of the heat sink for
Q9070 (but you would want to check all of the electrolytic caps if you had
an ESR meter handy).
Another approach would be to put in the 43 volts DC from an external power
source until something got hot or went up in smoke. If your power supply
allowed you to adjust the current limit you could sneak up on it and just
get the problem part(s) nice and warm. You will need to at least disconnect
Q9070 when you apply the external 43 VDC at TP940 and TP 950 from the bottom
or top of the mainboard. I lightly tack on two wires to the bottom side to
make the 43 VDC connections. You can use the scope in its normal way when it
is powered with the external 43 VDC.
The external 43 VDC idea came from a fine Tekscopes member named Hakan, many
years ago, and he has an excellent document you should read at:
A couple of years ago I made up a document listing some commonly available
components you might use to replace some of the original Tektronix part
numbers that often fail. I can send you that directly or you can find it in
the Tekscopes Message archive if you like.
Another thing you might do is take resistance readings from chassis ground
to each of the voltage test points before you get very far into this repair
(with the scope not connected to the mains of course!).
There are lots of other ideas to add to this, but this should get you
started.
This will be a simple fix, so just take your time and understand what you
are doing.
tom jobe...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tan Chor Ming" <jonray03@...>
To: <TekScopes@...>
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
> Has anyone seen this behaviour repairing Tek2000 series scope power
supply?
>
>
>
> Behaviour
>
> 1. When power on from cold, it will fire up properly and stay on for a few
> minutes
>
> 2. Once it warms up, the power supply shut down and try to on again and
it
> continues in this on/off mode
>
> 3. Pre-regulator out = 43V (between TP940 and TP950)
>
> 4. All voltages when the unit is stable for a few minutes are +8.6, -8.6,
> +5.2, +100 are all ok.
>
>
>
> What are likely problems before I start ripping the components from the
> circuit?
>
>
>
> ttesenq@...
suggested that it could be the pre-regulator MOSFET
> P9070.
>
>
>
> I though that it could be a electrolytic cap but it doe not look likely
> because electrolytic failure would not have allowed the unit to fire up
for
> a few minutes
>
> It is more likely a active component that weaken with increase
temperature,
> so ttesenq@...
could be right.
>
> This would mean Q947 and Q946 are also likely components
>
>
>
> Any other possible lead of similar experience.
>
>
|
Re: SG503 - Troubleshooting
Congratulations, Achilles. Great to hear that Q180 was the "fuse" and not Q190 which probably would be much more costly to replace, if a replacement could be sourced.
Patrick Wong
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "avassilicos@..." <avassilicos@...> wrote: ...I identified Q180 (2N3906) as having failed . C180 was also damaged (open). R180 and R216 had signs of cracked epoxy but their values were good. I replaced all of these components and the unit is running fine.
|
Folks,
The Tektronix 108 manual is here:
Here is a list of manuals that are needed, but not available:
If you have a copy of any of those manuals you can share, please get in touch with me. thanks, -Kurt
|
Re: 475 no trace problem.
Found a problem area in the vertical output board. 18v and 48v on outputs to the plates and no signal on them. The signal exists on both inputs to u470 and is within spec. Disconnecting the plate connections from u470 or power to the board gives a line 2 div wide which focuses fine .
Earlier when i though i was testing vertical, it was actualy horizontal plates.
Sweep problem appears to be a separate issue.
But i have had trouble with the manuals. I have the 475 service manual and the the military scope maintanace for 475a. the military one has more detail for voltage testpoints etc. However they both lack the waveforms of 468 service manual.
Is there a more datailed version of 475 service manual?
thanx
dan
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "dannyzukov" <dannyzukov@...> wrote: Trying to troubleshoot my 475 that quit working. Have the service manual but being new to scope repair i need some help.
The symptoms: a very very faint/blury horizontal line 1 div wide. that traces only once when switching trigers or playing with time/div nob goin from XY mode to slow sweep rates.
In XY the blury 1 div wide line can be controlled horizontaly but nothing verticaly. And it never wants to triger anything in any mode.
I have traced the vertical signal from the input to the tube and it appears to be getting vertical deflection signal but i am not clear on what amplitude and dc bias it should be.
Sweep generator appears to run only once.
Right now i am guessing that something is wrong around the sweep generator . But also do not understand why i am not getting a dot in XY. like there is some problem with CRT circuit.
Any input of what should i look at would be appreciated.
thanx
Dan
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
I saw your 2220 question the first time you posted it a few days ago, and I did not have a nice short answer for you. Since you have not gotten the answer you were looking for, let me comment a bit on this. First off, I don't own a 2220 or have the service manual for it, and none of the download sites I checked seem to have it either, including ArtekMedia.com having it for purchase. So I will assume it is similar to the better 22xx's such as the 2235, at least around the power supply. I will also assume that you do have a service manual to work with. U930 monitors the voltage drop across R907, and in your case it probably thinks the current is too high after a few minutes, so it shuts down. I have worked on lots of 22xx scopes and I have not seen the value of R907 drift and cause this problem, but others have reported that as a possibility. Odds are, that this is not your problem. An over current situation can be caused by anything after R907 within the inverter, the transformer itself or on the secondary side of the main transformer. How you go about finding the problem depends on what equipment you have available, and what your testing preferences might be. If you don't have much to work with, just start changing components. In my experience the components in the right rear corner of the mainboard cause the most grief so I would start there with C925, C942 and C943. If you have some decent soldering equipment you can change all three capacitors quickly without removing the mainboard. If you have access to an ESR meter you could check all of the aluminum electrolytic capacitors in circuit. Most of the electrolytics give no trouble, especially the six(?) 840 uF caps in front of the heat sink for Q9070 (but you would want to check all of the electrolytic caps if you had an ESR meter handy). Another approach would be to put in the 43 volts DC from an external power source until something got hot or went up in smoke. If your power supply allowed you to adjust the current limit you could sneak up on it and just get the problem part(s) nice and warm. You will need to at least disconnect Q9070 when you apply the external 43 VDC at TP940 and TP 950 from the bottom or top of the mainboard. I lightly tack on two wires to the bottom side to make the 43 VDC connections. You can use the scope in its normal way when it is powered with the external 43 VDC. The external 43 VDC idea came from a fine Tekscopes member named Hakan, many years ago, and he has an excellent document you should read at:
A couple of years ago I made up a document listing some commonly available components you might use to replace some of the original Tektronix part numbers that often fail. I can send you that directly or you can find it in the Tekscopes Message archive if you like. Another thing you might do is take resistance readings from chassis ground to each of the voltage test points before you get very far into this repair (with the scope not connected to the mains of course!). There are lots of other ideas to add to this, but this should get you started. This will be a simple fix, so just take your time and understand what you are doing. tom jobe...
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tan Chor Ming" <jonray03@...> To: <TekScopes@...> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 6:45 AM Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220 Has anyone seen this behaviour repairing Tek2000 series scope power supply?
Behaviour
1. When power on from cold, it will fire up properly and stay on for a few minutes
2. Once it warms up, the power supply shut down and try to on again and
it continues in this on/off mode
3. Pre-regulator out = 43V (between TP940 and TP950)
4. All voltages when the unit is stable for a few minutes are +8.6, -8.6, +5.2, +100 are all ok.
What are likely problems before I start ripping the components from the circuit?
ttesenq@... suggested that it could be the pre-regulator MOSFET P9070.
I though that it could be a electrolytic cap but it doe not look likely because electrolytic failure would not have allowed the unit to fire up for a few minutes
It is more likely a active component that weaken with increase temperature, so ttesenq@... could be right.
This would mean Q947 and Q946 are also likely components
Any other possible lead of similar experience.
|
Re: TR502 7L13/14 etc Lemo connector
Hello, --- In TekScopes@..., "Peter" <pdusel@...> wrote: Would you care to share the distributor you used, I went to lemo.com and selected the nearest office contact details and sent them an email inquiry. and I'm almost afraid to ask, the price? I am shamed to admit that "right now on my desk" actually means they have been buried under other parts for about a year now. Since you reminded me about the connectors I even went to local shop today to buy some 6 wire shielded cable. Sort of progress in other words. About the price, I have "archived" the invoice somewhere but if I run into it I'll add the cost to this thread. If I remember correctly the total was somewhere between 150 and 200 eur for six connectors and their bend reliefs without VAT. That FGG.2B was the most expensive of them at 40 (maybe more) eur IIRC. Bend reliefs were in order of eur or two each. That leaves at least 25 eur each for the 6-pin connectors. I hope this helps, --- In TekScopes@..., "nukescope" <vtp@> wrote:
Hello,
--- In TekScopes@..., "Peter" <pdusel@> wrote:
Does anybody know what the part number is for the six pin Lemo connector used on the logic cable used to connect a TR-502 to a 7L13/14? I happen to have a bag of those right on my desk and reading from the bags I have
FFA.1S.306.CLAC42Z - 6-pin connector GMA.1B.040.DG - bend relief
Sorry, no excess - I bought four of those for two cables. Had to order them from local Lemo office.
...
Since the other typical application for LEMO connectors comes up sometimes I am taking the opportunity to include the same information for CG511/CG5001 output cable.
I am reading FGG.2B.802.CLAM31Z for connector and GMA.0B.025.DG for bend relief for RG174/316. Again, these are for CG5001 calibration generator.
|
Hi to All,
Tek used the 8393 Nuvistors in the Type 1A6 and 1A7. Look at the Circuit Description of both Plug-Ins and you know why. The so called differential adjustment of heater voltages. In addition lower heater current is lower hum/noise (the reason Tek used 8416's in the 1S1).
Egge Siert
|
Re: 7T11 Sequential/Random Problem
Probably meaning it's only there at the fast ranges, 500 ns and 50 ns? The Rate meter can cope with an enormous range of repetition rates, split in 3 parts IIRC (more or less logarithmic). Because of that it's very well possible that the effect is confined to the faster timing ranges. Apart from a dozen other possible reasons of course. Albert
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The effect was not visible for risetimes longer than about 500 ps.
|
Re: SG503 - Troubleshooting
Hi Patrick,
I have some good news: my SG503 is fixed and running. With your and David's help, I identified Q180 (2N3906) as having failed . C180 was also damaged (open). R180 and R216 had signs of cracked epoxy but their values were good. I replaced all of these components and the unit is running fine.
The scenario that seems plausible to me is that the original culprit was Q180, failing intermittently and causing current surges. These surges blew C172 (1mF tantalum) a couple of times. C180 was good initially because I had replaced with a new 1mF/50V tantalum along with C172. Eventually when I applied external power, Q180 failed completely taking C180 along with it.
For future reference, here are some measurements for Q180 and Q190.
Bad Q180 Good Q180
V(B-E)=0.288 V, R(B-E)=350 Ohms V(B-E)=1.481 V, R(B-E)=6.0 KOhms V(E-B)=0.273 V, V(B-E)=0.673 V V(B-C)=0.289 V, R(B-C)=352 Ohms V(B-C)=0.750 V, R(B-C)=4.92 KOhms V(C-B)=0.275 V, V(C-E)=0.643 V V(C-E)=0.000 V, R(C-E)=6.5 Ohms V(C-E)=0.666 V, R(C-E)=1.63 KOhms V(E-C)=0.000 V, V(E-C)=1.305 V
Q190
V(B-E1)=0.701 V, V(E1-B)=1.339 V V(B-E2)=0.735 V, V(E2-B)=1.340 V V(C-E1)=0.719 V, V(E1-C)=0.609 V V(B-C)=0.694 V, V(C-B)=1.087 V V(C-E2)=0.748 V, V(E2-C)=0.614 V
Thanks again, -Achilles
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "Patrick Wong" <patwong3@...> wrote: Hi Achilles,
I'm wondering whether you've made further progress on your SG-503? Would like to hear the outcome when you have a chance. Thanks,
Patrick Wong AK6C
|
Re: 7T11 Sequential/Random Problem
Is this the kind of application where the differences between saturating (TTL) and non-saturating (ECL) logic would apply? I wonder if the extra jitter is from poor power supply rejection.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:57:34 -0000, "Mike" <zuckerme@...> wrote: BTW a 74LS14 with a resistor and mica capacitor provide a general-purpose 100 ns pretrigger delay. It seems stable to better than 20 ps rms if you happen upon a "good" inverter.
|
Re: 7T11 Sequential/Random Problem
I recall the behavior's independent of rep rate (at least between 1 kHz or so and 1 MHz). I initially saw it with my homebrew avalanchers, but it also was apparent with 067-0681-01 (driven at whatever rate you please), HP213B, 284, and S-52. I never tested it on my 109 because life is too short.
The effect was not visible for risetimes longer than about 500 ps.
BTW a 74LS14 with a resistor and mica capacitor provide a general-purpose 100 ns pretrigger delay. It seems stable to better than 20 ps rms if you happen upon a "good" inverter.
I also have a 7M11 delay line, but it's sluggish. I think the cable shield is corroded.
All in all I would love to fix my 7T11 and 7T11A but not clear where to start.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "Albert" <aodiversen@...> wrote: Hi Mike, Strange things in the dot pattern happen indeed in Random mode, but I don't remember a case of time-reversal. I think much depends on the repetition rate of your signal generator. I think the 264 and S-52 gave me no problems. I don't have faster repetition fast pulses. Long ago I have seen negative rise and fall time with 3S76/3T77A. And that was sequential mode while showing the square wave output of a 284. Albert
--- In TekScopes@..., "Mike" <zuckerme@> wrote:
David, Albert-
I have vaguely similar issues with both my 7T11 and 7T11A in random mode. I see large gaps in the horizontal dot density, and even misplaced (time-reversed!!) dots. For example by moving 7S11 delay, 7T11 time offset, and trigger position I can display a 100 ps step with positive, zero or even negative risetime (all with clean repeatable triggering).
--- Mike
|
r. Unfortunately Q203 is one of the more tedious-to-replace transistors in the HP130C, so at present it's put-off-today-what-you-can-do-later :), with the added excuse: experimentally lets see how long such a simple emergency fix is good for. Berj / KI3U
To: TekScopes@... From: gumbear@... Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:29:40 +0000 Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Nuvistors.
?
Q203 may have developed more leakage over the years and will eventually have to be replaced. I'd look for a replacment just to be ready for when it does.
Arden
> By way of a little OT, mine after decades of routine use last year developed, upon warm-up, folding and contracting of the trace. The problem turned out to be transistor Q203 in the horizontal amplifier. The extend-its-life-fix was to put a 10-fins light sheet aluminum heatsink on Q203.
|
Re: 7T11 Sequential/Random Problem
Hi Mike, Strange things in the dot pattern happen indeed in Random mode, but I don't remember a case of time-reversal. I think much depends on the repetition rate of your signal generator. I think the 264 and S-52 gave me no problems. I don't have faster repetition fast pulses. Long ago I have seen negative rise and fall time with 3S76/3T77A. And that was sequential mode while showing the square wave output of a 284. Albert
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "Mike" <zuckerme@...> wrote: David, Albert-
I have vaguely similar issues with both my 7T11 and 7T11A in random mode. I see large gaps in the horizontal dot density, and even misplaced (time-reversed!!) dots. For example by moving 7S11 delay, 7T11 time offset, and trigger position I can display a 100 ps step with positive, zero or even negative risetime (all with clean repeatable triggering).
--- Mike
|