开云体育

Two of my 37 marker Y matches that were listed as R-269 are now listed as R-L127 the father snp of my terminal branch R-FGC-13355.

I’m going to provide a few more examples so the members can get an idea of how far down the lines some of these FF Y designations go. This example in Z8 is from an FF test from April 2021 that has

Thanks, Robert. It’s helpful to know it doesn’t always work as expected. Charles

Charles and all, Yesterday Charles mentioned his one example of z156 family finder results. The tester being S5520+ and FGc11662-. This is my particular SNP path. This morning my father (B573209) just

I can see this happening. Obviously not with uploaded kits only their own ff test results. wrote:

I’m now also seeing updated FF results now including the Y SNPs, where the original FF test was several years ago. The examples from yesterday were all brand new FF test results. So FTDNA is now

YES! I’ve seen an example this morning of a tester who only has a 67 marker Y test, and Family Finder. He now has a CTS12023 Y haplogroup designation from his FF test. When I look at another member

Will these updates show on y matches as well. I know from other test I am down z30 pf5143 off the top of my head but my 111 test has me only as m269.

This is excellent news. I have an example in my area - downstream of R-DF98. A US tester, but of almost immediate German heritage, who had done Y-111 and Family Finder. His initial FF initially gave

Hello FTDNA said they would start with batches of 3,000; however some of the men already have SNP Pack and/or Big Y results. It appears that the first batch increased the number of SNP tested men by a

We need some L-1 lovin’ Jim “Griz” Adams [email protected]> wrote:

And one last example tonight from the L47 branch. This tester’s haplotree shows him as L47+, skip FGC8034, skip L44, skip FGC6185, then L163+, L46+, L45+, L493+. The Discover date for L493 is 100

Awesome, I was hoping S5520 would be included! Robert McMillan

My only example today from Z156 is a tester who is Z156+ and S5520+. However, he is also shown negative for the S5520 subgroup FGC11662, and also negative for two of the S5520 brother groups Z306 and

Here is an example from the Z18 branch. His haplotree shows him as Z18+, skip FGC79182, skip Z17, skip Z372, skip S5695, S4031+, S3207+, skip CTS5533, CTS2158+. Discover dates CTS2158 to 750 BC.

We do have new members joining the project today, clearly based on their new FF result with Y SNPs. Charles

Another example is from a tester who DID already have a Y SNP result from an upstream SNP Pack test, that placed him in our L48 group. But his FF test Y result shows him Z31+, which is downstream from

Here are two good examples that I have reviewed that are considerably far down two of our major branches, but nevertheless are haplogroups from the BC timeframe. I looked at these individuals’

Hi folks, A short update. I'm comparing the haplotree as of 10th November against today's. This will therefore partly confuse the changes that have happened over the last couple of days as Family

Hi Iain, all, Thank you Iain for this interesting information. On the tiny R-S19589 branch downstream R-U106, a new tester, of unknown origin, has recently appeared (R-FGC57423 - TMRCA ~574 BCE). I