¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHere are two good examples that I have reviewed that are considerably far down two of our major branches, but nevertheless are haplogroups from the BC timeframe. ?I looked at these individuals¡¯ Haplotrees to see what upstream SNPs FTDNA is showing a green result for. ?Again, these are testers with NO Y SNP tests at FTDNA, but new Family Finder tests where FTDNA is now providing limited Y-SNP results coming from the otherwise autosomal chip test they¡¯re using for FF. ?They DO have FTDNA STR results, and have joined our project based on their match lists or a test elsewhere. These new Y results are showing up on Y-DNA Project Results pages with green haplogroup labels in place of their previous red R-M269 labels.One of these examples is in our large Z8 branch, while the other is in Z326. Both of these testers¡¯ results on their haplotrees show green positive results for some SNPs down their common line of descent, but skipping the exact same ones, as follows: U106+, skip Z2265, skip BY30097, skip FTT8, Z381+, skip Z301, L48+, Z9+. Then, the one in Z8 continues with Z30+, skip Z27, skip Z345, Z2+, Z7+, Z31+, Z8+, Z1+, and finally Z346+. ?They also show Z344 negative for the brother group of Z346. ?Discover dates Z346 to about 750 BC. The other example continues below Z9 with Z331+, Z330+, Z326+, skip Z8168, FGC18842+, S23955+, skip A656, skip A657, and finally Y67920+. ?Discover dates this to 650 BC. I¡¯ll send some more examples a bit later. Charles? On Dec 7, 2023, at 7:54?AM, Iain via groups.io <gubbins@...> wrote:
|
