开云体育

Hi Ian and Brian, Thank you for the feedback and advice. The terminal haplogroup is?R-BY194284. This is a similar situation to my Gleave line in which I was all alone? on R-BY55111 for several years

This will become a not uncommon problem. I have had to tell one family in America fairly recently that they have an NPE event around 1675 in America - and they are all really Swanns - all of them. We

Speculations based on phylogeography of the Y-Chromosome are a great way to learn some British history. But I would always remind you of the "Africans in Yorkshire" paper from about 2007 - which

KevinA Big Y test would show the bard how far back his DF98 branch was in Ireland!! Also, FTDNA are dragging their heels with the Y info from the Family Finder tests. Z156 went from 4,516 to 4,564

Yes,? thank you, Leake. I meant "geographical" area. - Tom

A good idea might be to do a Y 37 DNA test with FT. The matches list should show whether you are a Daly or some other surname a few centuries ago! -- Kevin Terry

I would just add that so any of these types of questions come from America. What will slowly but gradually change the picture is that the idea of Bigy-700 testing getting more embedded in the family

Like 1st Crusaders?

Hi Mike, By R-194282, I presume you mean R-BY194284? I don't know what searching you've done for your 3*great-grandfather's ancestry. I'm expecting you've already looked for records on Scotland's

Hi Noah, I'm not sure about R-P312 in Scandinavia - it's a little outside my realm of knowledge. Certainly R-P312 seems to have travelled west before R-U106, so got a foothold on the Atlantic Coasts

Hello CHristiaan, I will definitely take a look at this talk. Incidentally, you may find my 2017 essay on the same topic, titled Reflections on the demographic prehistory of Europe, at the following

Interesting lecture about the genetic history of Europe by Johannes Krause (Max-Planck institute Leipzig) https://youtu.be/mWTVx3Cx6Zc?si=QPNFsSGjtQfb2vmJ

Hi Tom - quick question, do you mean to say "geological" or "geographical" place for this genetic cluster? leake

Hi All, After hanging out with the?R-FGC910 branches for the last four years, through my Gleave surname and very small surname project, I decided to test my mother's paternal line and luckily managed

I'm not sure the solidness of this question. However, in the Little Surname DNA Project we have a fair-sized group of men with surname Little/Lyttle and fall under U106 > L1 > A680 ...? This was Leo

Thank you for the clarification Iain. Do you think that most of the elevated P312 in Norway/Denmark vis-à-vis Sweden can be attributed to increased Bell Beaker influence in those areas? Best, Noah

A Big Y test would be the best way for you to learn about your Y line. Its not that expensive!

Hi Noah, I wasn't intending to say that R-P312 was more or less common than R-U106 per se, merely that I + R1a + R-P312 represents most Viking Y-DNA, while R-U106 is only a small fraction. Indeed,

Hi Iain, Quick question regarding R-P312 vs R-U106 in Scandinavia. When you say P312 was more common than U106 among Vikings, are you referring specifically to Norwegians and Danes? I thought that at

Hi Alex, The "not the parent expected" possibility is remarkably common. Even in well-attested genealogies like those of medieval royal dynasties, the rate of unknown cuckoldry is about 1%, perhaps a