开云体育

I have the same thing. FGC11686 has split off from the FGC11685 block. Block tree shows no testers, discover shows 1. Its been split at FTDNA long enough to show up at SNP Finder and David Vance's SNP

Hi folks, This is an interesting result, especially since it breaks up the R-U106>A2150>BY69794 block. The connection to the Tumulus culture is important, as we have other R-U106 branches belonging to

Just to remind everyone, the small R-A2150 branch that Ewenn is discussing in conjunction with the LEU007 sample, is immediately below R-U106, and notably retains the ancestral DYS492 STR result =12,

Hi all, I attempted an analysis of LEU007, to check if it can really belongs to R-U106, and if possible to refine its haplogroup. LEU007 consists of several fastq files. I only analyzed the "YC1"

truly fascinating Based on combined lines of evidence, we observe that the kinship structure of the burial community was predominantly patrilineal/virilocal involving female exogamy.

Thanks, Found the sample at line 6 of excel table in the supplement. Hope to now find mention of sample in the body of the text.... I am not so practiced in the art of such things but I greatly

Hi, Only one aDNA in this study seems to belong to R-U106, named LEU007. This would be the 5th oldest R-U106+ aDNA recorded to date. Its fastq file has just been added to the European Nucleotide

I think it would be this one: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-54462-6 [email protected]> wrote:

I was unable to trace the "news blip" back to refereed journal article. If such exists, might someone provide the link ? ________________________________ Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2024 6:51 AM To:

They were only able to confirm it fell under U106. They used the 1240K assay rather than the more comprehensive (and more expensive) shotgun method. Ray wrote:

nice ! do you know the haplogroup!? -- KELL KOCH President Phone: 208-578-4806 kochson.com

Yes, it is possible for a Big Y result to appear in the Discover tool before it appears in the Block Tree and in the Big Y Match list. ? It sounds like this is the case for the "missing" R-BY153002

I have a BigY vs Discover discrepancy very near my Terminal SNP.? Its only one man, but it's?still bugging me.? This has been true for a few weeks now, so I doubt it's a case of one module catching

From Facebook R-U106 group today! -- Kevin Terry

Treasure-filled grave belonging to a teen girl and child unearthed after 1,300 years Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/article284039243.html#storylink=cpy

I would point out that this paper seems to have taken nearly 18 months to be accepted. [cid:image001.png@...] And I do wonder if you analyse populations to this level of detail - don't

https://allofus.nih.gov/news-events/announcements/275-million-new-genetic-variants-identified-nih-precision-medicine-data - Wayne K

I do apologize to the forum for this discussion as it's not pertinent. I blame Al for rising to my bait. Al, autosomal DNA is off topic. However as I'm a public spirited sort of chap, may I advise the

Oh dear, stop digging in the same hole. If you hadn't reminded us we might have started to forget your shame. But I suppose digging is in the blood. Peter

I've only just noticed this outrageously offensive comment from Peter. As a possible 25% Welshman I should point out my possible 25% Welsh ancestors were the backbone of our medieval miltary archers,