Re: Hg38 to T2T upgrate
Hi Ciar¨¢n and all. I too have done the upgrade and am under S5520. Not just me, but 9 or 10 McMillans under FGC11674/FGC11696 and its parent FGC11665. While I agree with Dr McDonald's views on this,
By
Robert McMillan
·
#7910
·
|
Re: Hg38 to T2T upgrate
There are no more matches on my kit at YFull probably because the terminal snp is at Y7378 (above what FTdna has as the final), but it's interesting to see the number of snps that are now 'positive'
By
Linda Wheaton
·
#7909
·
|
Re: Hg38 to T2T upgrate
| SNPs (all): | 403261 | | | Positive: | 2246?(0.56%) | | | Negative: | 14766?(3.66%) | | | Ambiguous: | 15?(0.00%) | | | No call: | 3843?(0.95%) | This is from my T2T upgrade | SNPs (all): |
By
C.B.
·
#7908
·
|
Re: BigY - is it worth it?
Did a BigY about ten days ago. I look forward to the results! Best regards,
By
Dado
·
#7907
·
|
Re: Hg38 to T2T upgrate
Kevin I have seven more private YSNPs from the upgrade. That's a total of 12 YSNPs that are specific to my Y line. I will have to wait until Yfull updates their tree to see if it makes a difference to
By
C.B.
·
#7906
·
|
Re: Hg38 to T2T upgrate
Thanks Kevin.
By
C.B.
·
#7905
·
|
Re: VK389 and Kincaid dna as evidence of Vikings on Clyde river, Scotland?
Thanks again Dr. McDonald for your input.? So while I can conclude that R-A321 is a Campsie parish snp, any thoughts on prior history will have to wait until one of the gap snps pop up in an ancient
By
A321son <bpkgroups@...>
·
#7904
·
|
Re: Hg38 to T2T upgrate
Hi Ciar¨¢n Before the upgrade I had two SNP matches at the level Y128031. With one, a BigY500, I had 34 shared SNPs and 20 assumed shared SNPs. With the other, a T2T Nebula Genomics test I had 43
By
Kevin Terry
·
#7903
·
|
Re: Hg38 to T2T upgrate
Hello KevinI am interested in this upgrade. Have you learned anything? Is it worth it? Ciar¨¢n
By
C.B.
·
#7902
·
|
Re: Hg38 to T2T upgrate
I received my T2T results today. Attached shows the difference with the upgrade. It will take me some time to digest this! -- Kevin Terry
By
Kevin Terry
·
#7901
·
|
Re: VK389 and Kincaid dna as evidence of Vikings on Clyde river, Scotland?
Hi all, These are the formation dates of each haplogroup, but it's more normal to talk about the TMRCAs. In terms of understanding origins, you should be looking at the geographical distribution of a
By
Iain
·
#7900
·
|
Re: VK389 and Kincaid dna as evidence of Vikings on Clyde river, Scotland?
It is interesting to note that in the mid 14th century, aside from the Bishop of Glasgow, the Galbraiths and the Lennoxes, a good chunk of the land in Campsie, Baldernock and Strathblane parishes were
By
A321son <bpkgroups@...>
·
#7899
·
|
Re: VK389 and Kincaid dna as evidence of Vikings on Clyde river, Scotland?
Myles: I was just going by wikipedia which records that in 2021 immigrants accounted for 1,036,803 people out of a population of 5,391,369 or 19.23%
By
A321son <bpkgroups@...>
·
#7898
·
|
Mass grave with 1,000-1500 (plague) skeletons found in Germany | CNN
A sad discovery. At the same time, a wealth of DNA extraction possibilities, should funding be made available. These are all likely locals and it would be interesting to see an analysis of Y-DNA
By
Dan D.
·
#7897
·
|
Re: VK389 and Kincaid dna as evidence of Vikings on Clyde river, Scotland?
There are still a HUGE number of haplogroups to discover for males in Norway during the 1500¡¯s. Almost daily I check the Hordaland Norway DNA Project
By
Myles Twete
·
#7896
·
|
Re: VK389 and Kincaid dna as evidence of Vikings on Clyde river, Scotland?
In my father's line, I? know that his family is from Ravensberg, Germany (immigration to US c. 1890) and have a paper trail of marriages and baptisms back to about 1760. ?There are no testers that
By
Linda Wheaton
·
#7895
·
|
Re: VK389 and Kincaid dna as evidence of Vikings on Clyde river, Scotland?
Thank you Dr. Iain McDonald for your input.? Just to be clear there are a couple of points perhaps misunderstood that I want to be clear about. 1) Kincaids emerge in Scottish records in 1425.? The
By
A321son <bpkgroups@...>
·
#7894
·
|
Re: VK389 and Kincaid dna as evidence of Vikings on Clyde river, Scotland?
Hi all, There's a lot here to unpack, so let me start from the beginning: FTDNA's TMRCAs are likely to be significantly better than what's currently on the Big Tree. There are several reasons for this
By
Iain
·
#7893
·
|
Re: VK389 and Kincaid dna as evidence of Vikings on Clyde river, Scotland?
Thanks for your feedback Susan. For Kincaids, until something new pops up, all lines appear to be extinct from 100 AD to 1425 AD.? After 20 years and perhaps over 35 million ancestry dna tests (30
By
A321son <bpkgroups@...>
·
#7892
·
|
Re: Hg38 to T2T upgrate
Thanks to all for all the advice. I have ordered the T2T analysis & will share any relevant information. Interestingly what drew my attention to the T2T analysis was a new SNP match on YFull, who
By
Kevin Terry
·
#7891
·
|