¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Re: Frida y F ive J une 7
1. What is the stupidist thing??you have ever seen Google recommend? To get rid of kidney stones - drink two liters of urine a day 2.? What us the worst law the US congress passed in? the 20th
By mrvnchpmn · #2559 ·
Re: Frida y F ive J une 7
1. What is the stupidist thing??you have ever seen Google recommend? 2.? What us the worst law the US congress passed in? the 20th century? 3.? Should the US allow Ukraine to use US supplied
By mrvnchpmn · #2558 ·
Re: Friday Five May 31
What evidence is there for falsification - except the statement of a? convicted perjurer.? The federal crimes are the interfering with the presidentail election. Sometimes I wonder how you? That's
By mrvnchpmn · #2557 ·
Re: Friday Five May 31
Marvin, That's pretty funny. Read New York law some time. Trump falsified business records to commit or conceal another crime. It has nothing to do with the Constitution nor with the jurisdiction of
By a1thighmaster · #2556 ·
Re: Friday Five May 31
Election law is federal - no state has jurisdiction in a federal election. Read the constitution some time! Marvin, Are you really asking what the felony is when it is well known that all 34 felony
By mrvnchpmn · #2555 ·
Re: [Owner] Re: [PhilosophicalM] Friday Five May 31
The only violation of election law would be under a federal statute - which is not trialble in a state court. Mavin
By mrvnchpmn · #2554 ·
Re: [Owner] Re: [PhilosophicalM] Friday Five May 31
A multi-billion dollar corporation's individual journal entries number in the thousands each month, and are not very detailed. I can't imagine a presidential election coming out differently over how
By Ed Lomas · #2553 ·
Re: [Owner] Re: [PhilosophicalM] Friday Five May 31
Ed, LOL! Nice try, but not correct. If falsifying business records were the only thing he'd been charged with then that is still a misdemeanor. Because the falsification was done in order to influence
By a1thighmaster · #2552 ·
Re: [Owner] Re: [PhilosophicalM] Friday Five May 31
Up until this year it was a misdemeanor. So an accountant entered blackmail payments to a prostitute under an ambiguous description, and the state went after the guy being blackmailed. Who was the
By Ed Lomas · #2551 ·
Re: Friday Five May 31
Marvin, Are you really asking what the felony is when it is well known that all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to cover up hush money payments to a porn star were done to influence
By a1thighmaster · #2550 ·
Re: Friday Five May 31
David, I'm sure there's no connection. It's all about Trump's bold flauting of state and federal law. We have checks and balances in our governmental systems that prevent interference between these
By a1thighmaster · #2549 ·
Re: Friday Five May 31
First - ;what is the alleged felony?? Second why was the trial brought by the same person who refused to charge him before?? Third why was the charge brought immediately after he declared his
By mrvnchpmn · #2548 ·
Re: Friday Five May 31
I've not followed the story at all closely, Celeste. But is it a coincidence that these legal attacks occurred all at once now and in a location hostile to Trump? Do you suspect no connection?
By David Smith · #2547 ·
Re: Friday Five May 31
David, That's not what Trump's trial was about really. It was about him paying to have his affair covered up so it wouldn't look bad to his supporters. He managed to commit felonies in order to do
By a1thighmaster · #2546 ·
Re: Friday Five May 31
// A rich businessman paid to silence a sex scandal. Gee, that is a first! Does anyone care where rich businessmen put their junk? Not if it is between consenting adults...I am sure most people have
By David Smith · #2545 ·
Re: Friday Five May 31
Yes, I trust the ones I voted for. Not at all. I'm just glad that the jury did it right. I certainly hope so. Trump would not be able to view classified information if he were elected. Already did.
By a1thighmaster · #2544 ·
Re: Friday Five May 31
*1. Do you trust your political leaders to have your best interests paramount in their actions?* LOL. I believe at least some of them have some good intentions and that there is the usual variety of
By Darrell King · #2543 ·
Re: Friday Five May 31
1. Do you trust your political leaders to have your best interests paramount in their actions? No. All political leaders put their own interests first. But I expect political leaders to put their
By FreedomRocks · #2542 ·
Re: Friday Five May 31
1.? Do you trust your political leaders to have your best interests paramount in their actions? 2.? Was the Trump trial verdict unexpected? 3.? Will the verdict effect the election? 4.? Will you
By mrvnchpmn · #2541 ·
Re: Friday Five May 17.
1. Should Victronix remove the blades from their Swiss Army knivees? Sure, if they think that is the best business decision. I have no idea what Victronix is or what the issue with their blades in
By FreedomRocks · #2540 ·