开云体育

This wouldve been a CLIST executed as part of your logon PROC. Joe

Hello Dave, Am 26.06.2020 um 07:00 schrieb Dave Trainor <dave@...>: Have a look in TK4-. When you log on via TSO, a "fortune cookie" is output. Maybe you can find out how it works. :wq! PoC

I would join to this request and I completely share this statement. I'm an element of the 'set' really well defined within this statement { "we know how to a

Is anyone aware of a utility for a MOTD (Message of the day) utility for MVS? I seem to remember back 40yr ago we always got a humorous message as I am guessing a broadcast message when we logged on,

On 6/25/20 2:40 PM, Doug Wegscheid wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 02:08 PM, Jay Moseley wrote: > > It sounds like you prefer the Dynamic Proclib approach, so that is > probably what you should use

Doug, I don't remember anything spec

Yes, Omegamon was originally developed by Candle Corporation. IBM purchased Candle for Omegamon later on. Mark dasdman

Jay, what didn't you like about the dynamic proclib? (I'm not trying to spark an argument; your experience enables you to see something there that I don't, so I want to understand what I am not

The company I work for had OMEGAMON. We downgraded to ASG TMON a few years, or maybe it was closer to a decade, after I got started in operations. I missed OMEGAMON. I vaguely remember coming across

My concern is not response time but security. Given good security on MVS (RAKF is in my sights) and a reliable 4361, I'd talk to the owners about putting up an MVS guest. So having such a huge library

You missed a step, namely I need "get a clue" first.? :-) Thanks! -ahd- -- Drew Derbyshire "Do not send unsolicited advertising, chain letters, automatic messages or other spam to this address. Abuse

That brain (of mine) that doesn't trust "OMEGAMON"?? It LIKES the old product being called LOOK. Of course, it probably wasn't CA- then.? They bought most everybody later (post-1985) ... the blob

"Clearly Jay is targeting a wide audience." I didnt say ONLY his MVS. I said it targeted his MVS. Plus if you take the ENTIRE sentence, and not just a snippet you see... "I*n order to be compatible

On 6/24/20 9:34 PM, Drew Derbyshire wrote: > (Blew your address the first time.? Ooops.) > I had various issues with SYSCPK install and contents. > First, the changes to the JES2 procedure: > * #1

If you had to restore because you had mucked up something in PARMLIB, you have the option to IPL ZZSA, fix whatever (JES2PARM, VATLST00, ...), then try to IPL MVS again.

Mark, I looked at DCMS 2.0; on the face of it, it appears to be a precursor to IMON? In anycase, the load modules in FILE245 of CBT tape 227 just throw a SOC3. Has anyone gotten DCMS working with MVS

OMEGAMON sticks in my head, but I don't trust my memory on the topic. I DO remember that both the old and new commands used non-alphabetic characters. -- Drew Derbyshire "She was married when we first

This is not accurate.? To quote http://www.jaymoseley.com/hercules/compilers/syscpk.htm: "In order to be compatible with the largest number of Hercules/MVS users ...".? Clearly Jay is targeting a

CA-LOOK De: [email protected] <[email protected]> Em nome de Mark Waterbury Enviada em: quinta-feira, 25 de junho de 2020 13:57 Para: [email protected] Assunto: Re: [H390-MVS] Third party

Drew, From that time period when MVS 3.8J was still "current" and actively in use -- perhaps it might have been a product like "MICS" or "OMEGAMON" that you recall? For a "free" tool on the CBT Tapes,