Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 02:53 AM, Jeff Duce wrote:
Jeff,
?I know this connector as XT60, but that's a minor problem. The bigger one is that there is a 10A fuse at the input that connects to the radio, while it can be seen on the opposite side in the conceptual drawing. So I see this as a faulty design, the pcb needs to be rearranged a bit. In the conceptual drawing, the left side is the input from the power supply, the right side is connected to the radio. --
Gyula HA3HZ |
Looks pretty nice to me!!!? ? Gordon KX4Z On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 8:53?PM Jeff Duce via <jefe_de_estado=[email protected]> wrote:
|
开云体育
So here's the latest.? My thought is that this would more or less replace the existing plug on the radio.? Can't really do that inside the radio without a lot of effort.? Here you would just plug in the board into the existing plug, which means you can now
only plug power into the board. The enclosure would have some sort of lid, but I haven't drawn it yet.? It uses a single existing screw from the bottom of the case to keep it from getting torqued too much when you unplug.? The box would need to be 3D printed,
it's a bit awkard and needs way more support that I'd like, but it's pretty small, so shouldn't be too bad.
From Left to right:? F1 would be a 10A fuse. D1 is a TVS diode to filter out fast high voltage transients (ESD protection).? The middle section (C1 to D3) is a crowbar overvolt circuit.? When voltage is below 16v, no current goes through these devices.? The
gate to the SCR is at 0V, so nothing happens.? When voltage is above 16v, the zener D2 allows voltage to pass, which turns on the gate on the SCR.? The SCR then creates a high current short to ground, which then pops the fuse.? Caps and ferrite for filtering
so you don't induce a current and pop the fuse from RF. Next section is reverse polarity protection.? After some going back and forth, I've picked a mosfet that is very low Rds, (1.6mOhm).? If power is connected with the correct voltage, it passes the current
with only a maximum power loss of 0.16w.? If polarity is reversed, Vgs will be 0v, and the mosfet won't turn on, no voltage at the output.
So you get ESD, overvolt, overcurrent, reverse polarity protection with no voltage drop at very low power loss.?
Let me know if I've made any major mistakes here.? I figure I'll make a short run of boards to test and verify I didn't mess up the board design.? If that's all good, then I'll run do a larger order and put them up for sale on the etsy page.? Downside is that
this process could take a month or so.?
Jeff
From:[email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of HA3HZ <gyula@...>
Sent:?Friday, September 20, 2024 11:21 PM To:[email protected] <[email protected]> Subject:?Re: [BITX20] Reverse polarity protection on the sBitx? #sBitx #sBITX_v3 ?
Andy,
if you have already brought up the topic here, I will answer here, although the title of the topic does not indicate this. I, who am only a radio user and cannot code, am told by others that it is not too late to learn. The sBitx developers settled on Discord because many other devices are discussed in this forum. Besides, you also know that the direct answer option is given there, not here. In this way, developers can immediately find the questions that concern them and can answer them. So it is not so easy to distinguish between the two servers, because each has advantages and disadvantages, you just have to consider them. Just as no two people are the same, no two thoughts are the same. You can be confrontational and you can come to an agreement. It is not necessary for everyone to go there, anyone who is interested in the matter and has an idea to share can do so. --
Gyula HA3HZ
|
Re: A long long video on building feedback amplifiers
Farhan,
?
? ?Your feedback amp page lives in a tan on my phone that's been open for more than a year now. Truly - thank you for the vid and calculator.
?
? ?Thank you for your observations - I will add them to my notebook and work to internalize them!
?
? ?Best,
? ? Andy |
Re: A long long video on building feedback amplifiers
On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 04:37 PM, AndyH wrote:
2SC5551A Terminations as farhan says is important!
?
Also Rf (feedback resistors) vs bias...?
Sometimes that resistor can be juggled to be the bias value.? Often
its too low for that so series resistance bypassed with suitable value
cap gives a valid DC bias with correct feedback.
?
Additionally many devices the FT and Beta vary with emitter current.
Some like the 5551A show curves that improve with increased current
also same for 2n2219A.? Others like the frequently used 2n3904 actually
decreases above about 12-15ma (best peak is 10ma).? Searching for
detailed datasheets helps with getting that information. Some vendors
have notably sparse datasheets making that harder to know.? Looking
at the same device from a different vendor often results in a more
detailed datasheet.
?
One thing seen with very high FT devices is oscillation at vhf or uhf
(usually well above frequency of interest) and usually in multi stage
amplifiers that often shows as reduced gain or less than expected
power.? For example the FT for the 2sc5551A 3.5ghz!? ?With a gain
bandwidth product layout and construction is a factor.? Sloppy long
leads and poor grounds will bite back.
?
At the other extreme the usual 2n3904 the FT is 300mhz which varies
from 250 to 380mhz or more.? The problem with that is; build a gain
of 17DB for use at 28mhz...? it does not net the correct gain in practice
due to low FT, it has more than enough beta.? The test is
FT/frequency-max. so for a gain of 20 (13db) at 28mhz the FT must
be more than 560mhz (500mhz will likely do)!? ?Conversely the best
a 300mhz part can do?across many samples is about 10 (10db!).
?
Resistive feedback can also be used with jfets and mosfets as well
The calculations are different due to the gain nature of the devices.
FETs are voltage to current so the calculations need some math
translation.? Generally it works the same and FETs (mos or junction)
do not for the most part exhibit FT.
?
Building wideband amplifies is actually more difficult than the
basic calculations from W1ZOI suggest as they hold well for
small signal at below VHF.? ?As we go up the reactive properties
and unintended feedback become a more significant factor.
?
--
Allison ------------------ Please use the forum, offline and private will go to bit bucket. |
Re: A long long video on building feedback amplifiers
Andy, On Sun, Sep 22, 2024, 5:07 AM AndyH via <awhecker=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Re: A long long video on building feedback amplifiers
Farhan - it's still an excellent video and calculator - thank you!
?
Are there any rules of thumb about selecting the isolation resistor for the power input? I've seen from 10 to 220 Ohms. Is it calculated like a current limiter, or??
?
I've been experimenting with connecting multiple stages of amplifiers together.? I was surprised at the interaction between transformer coupled stages designed for 50 Ohms in and out. After tweaking a W8DIZ 2SC5551A amp for 17 dB of gain, gain of the first stage jumped about 5 dB after connecting? the second 17 dB stage. Does that sound normal?
?
There's art and science in this RF stuff.? Thanks for your work, and for easing the transition to W7ZOI'S feedback amp models.
?
73, Andy
?
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 10:20 AM, Ashhar Farhan wrote:
|
Andy,
if you have already brought up the topic here, I will answer here, although the title of the topic does not indicate this. I, who am only a radio user and cannot code, am told by others that it is not too late to learn. The sBitx developers settled on Discord because many other devices are discussed in this forum. Besides, you also know that the direct answer option is given there, not here. In this way, developers can immediately find the questions that concern them and can answer them. So it is not so easy to distinguish between the two servers, because each has advantages and disadvantages, you just have to consider them. Just as no two people are the same, no two thoughts are the same. You can be confrontational and you can come to an agreement. It is not necessary for everyone to go there, anyone who is interested in the matter and has an idea to share can do so. --
Gyula HA3HZ |
JJ - I've already posted what I use here. Feel free to scroll up the thread on the web interface.
?
You could have PMd me as well. Maybe some of this history will be useful for the new folks though, so I'll entertain your query.
?
This is the only official support location for Farhan's projects.? Many have tried slack and discord groups in the past - going back to at least 2017 - and...well, they've become very tiny fiefdoms or abandoned lots.
?
Folks can do as they wish, of course - I was in uniform way too long to believe or suggest? otherwise. As a former serial business owner that used IRC and discord as support channels, and as a gamer and dad to a gamer, I'm familiar with the strengths and weaknesses of discord. That's ultimately why I'm against it for this group.
?
People are still scratch building BITX20 and 40 radios - try pulling relevant info from a Discord channel from 6 months ago, much less from 2005. Good luck with that!
?
There was a time when we agreed.
?
?
73, Andy
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
? |
Please just put what you want us to look at HERE....please don't force us into yet ANOTHER venue, OK/ Thanks Gordon KX4Z On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 12:08?PM Jeff Duce via <jefe_de_estado=[email protected]> wrote:
|
... unless the -ve O/P from the PSU shares the same ground as the rig or ATU!!!!!!!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:31 PM, David Lacey wrote:
I am surprised no one so far has used the simplest way of protection. |
Re: Advice and Opinions on the next iteration of the sBitx
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 03:20 PM, IU0KVG wrote:
- push button to shut down the PI Interesting post. How long have you been using this device and reading the developments here?
--
Gyula HA3HZ |
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Gordon Gibby KX4Z <docvacuumtubes@...>
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2024 8:59:08 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [BITX20] Reverse polarity protection on the sBitx? #sBitx #sBITX_v3 ?
We’ve got three instances of destroyed radios in our local group alone. Connectors are nice, but that doesn’t stop people from putting clips on storage batteries backwards. ??
It can be done with series diodes in low power devices ;
P channel mosfets in medium power ;
And in diode controlled relays in really high-powered devices?
Dc-powered radios that ?I consider valuable to me , I generally provide protection for!
Our local group just did an Arduino based Winkeyer ?project, and putting a series diode in there before the voltage regulator was easy ; most of my HF go boxes have mosfet ?protection?
Gordon kx4z?
On Sep 20, 2024, at 11:40, Gary Eldridge - KC8UD via groups.io <gary.video@...> wrote:
|
开云体育We’ve got three instances of destroyed radios in our local group alone. Connectors are nice, but that doesn’t stop people from putting clips on storage batteries backwards. ??It can be done with series diodes in low power devices ; P channel mosfets in medium power ; And in diode controlled relays in really high-powered devices? Dc-powered radios that ?I consider valuable to me , I generally provide protection for! Our local group just did an Arduino based Winkeyer ?project, and putting a series diode in there before the voltage regulator was easy ; most of my HF go boxes have mosfet ?protection? Gordon kx4z? On Sep 20, 2024, at 11:40, Gary Eldridge - KC8UD via groups.io <gary.video@...> wrote:
|