开云体育

Yes. Interesting observation on the chart though. Carl [email protected]> wrote:

This is a family show. Watch that language Mark ;-). [email protected]> wrote:

Hi Len How about an ASL-themed slide rule so I can more easily calculate CC odds. ? wrote:

That is awesome Whit, glad you're back!! I cannot make it this year but hopefully can meet you and the kid next time. :) MikeS

This lawyer thinks that is the right interpretation - the later rules revision is highly probative if not dispositive.

Sounds good Ken, Carl wrote:

Awesome!! See you there! wrote:

Hi all! Looking forward to seeing folks at Nor'easter this weekend! Just wanted to let my YASL friends be the first to know that in the near future I'm opening an Etsy shop where I'll be selling

Another interesting fact. The original first printing of the ASL rules had "LLMC/LLTC” omitted in A12.141. This was added later to A12.141, however they did not update the Concealment Loss Chart.

The shot completely missed the concealed units and only affected the unconcealed units (see context below). It was a DFPh shot that affected the unconcealed units but had not affect on the concealed

I am at the hotel right now so no chart handy, but attacked resulting in a MC/TC is on that chart somewhere. [email protected]> wrote:

Thanks Carl, I might need new glasses… I don’t see it on the chart, which is why I’m asking. The chart doesn’t list taking or failing LLTC but A12.141 has it listed as an example.

Go by the Concealment Loss table. The rules themselves list that as the go-to. I believe take a TC/MC is on there. [email protected]> wrote:

I also found A12.141 Actions: LLTC/LLMC, attempts to entrench, set a Fire, Deploy, Recombine, make a Sniper Check or PF/MOL/ATMM check, rally a broken unit, engage in Clearance attempts, change CA,

Hi, Q1: Would a LLMC result in concealment loss for units that fail and break? Q2: Would a LLTC result in concealment loss for units that fail and become pinned? Context: In our scenario example, a

Het Whit, Looking forward to seeing you again. You can be forgiven for your absence by dragging some new blood into the fold. Thx, Charlie <whit.richardson@...> wrote:

Hi Mike, my bad, was thinking of 'Nick' Richardson, not 'Whit' Richardson in my answer below but sure glad to see Joe will be making it, what a great guy, the man with the magic Dioramas, Vic.

Yes, Joe is attending, and bringing his latest diorama for the winner! -Mike

Hi, Just wanted to confirm that Andy Howard got the emails about the matchup with Ron Duenskie. Andy, I have Ron's picks, if you can get me yours, I'll help with scenario and side

Hi Whit, is Joe Leoce coming as well? I will be there for the Saturday daytime round, if I have no other matchup, or they don't need me for the tourney, I would love to play you and/or your son, I