Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Yaac-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: Tracking station not working
Greetings. Playing catch-up on things I didn't answer, or answered privately instead of to the list.
The Track Station option just keeps the station on the visible part of the map. It only pans if the station would move off the edge of the map. This is because map re-drawing is expensive, especially on machines like the Raspberry Pi with extremely slow mass storage (the SD card). So I wanted to minimize the map redraws to only when necessary. Note that, if you are tracking multiple mobile stations that are going off opposite sides of the map, the map may zoom out to keep both stations on the map simultaneously. There is a new choice on the View menu, the Tracked Station List, which allows you to customize the map behavior on a per-station basis. One useful option there is the Double-Sized Icon; if you are not already using double-sized icons for all stations, this could make it easier to spot tracked stations because they would be drawn larger on the map. Hope this helps. Andrew, KA2DDO author of YAAC |
Re: Missing lake in front of my house
开云体育Wow, Andrew, that is great.? I look forward to seeing the results.? Thank you very much for your excellent program and the support you provide.? Truly extraordinary!! ? Joe VA3JLF ? ? Sent from for Windows 10 ? From: Andrew P.
Sent: April 26, 2020 8:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [yaac-users] Missing lake in front of my house ? Hi, Joe. ? |
Re: Configuration for fill-in digipeater / RF <> IS Igate
Andrew,
thanks a lot for getting back to me on this. ?I wasn’t sure if I’d posted correctly and I apologize for not following up. ?After this I checked my setup again and I think I’ve figured out that I had the tx delay on the TNCPI set to short such that even though it was transmitting when my radios heard the “ack” from the Digipeater from a Igated device my radios wouldn’t hear it, they just heard the last part of the transmission I guess. So i got on and programmed a 250ms preamble delay and haven’t had any problems with the outbound transmissions. ? Great software, I’m deploying this on a popular repeater site to cover the east / central side of phoenix area. ? |
Re: Missing lake in front of my house
Hi, Joe.
After much tearing of hair and taking the names of several famous mathematicians in vain :-) I have found a new algorithm for the map importer that fixes your issues on Lake Ontario (and several other places). I'm still resolving some corner cases for Lake Superior and Lake Michigan, but I hope to have them fixed as well in a few days. It's just painful that it takes 20 hours (!) to run the entire planet OSM dataset through the importer so I can check the results. I fixed most of the Lake Ontario issues using a map data excerpt for just the lake and its immediate surrounds, but even that took an hour per run. Andrew, KA2DDO |
Re: Changing Call Sign in YACC
To avoid this issue for other users, I am making a change in the configuration wizard in build 149, such that changing your callsign will check for every port using the old callsign and ask whether you want to update the callsign on those ports. It will also account for SSID changes (even if the callsign doesn't change).
|
Re: APRS-IS passes weather, RF does not
开云体育That's what I'm planning for the next build. Just a little bit of delay before sending the next packet, and filling in the packet when it is transmitted, rather than when it is queued.And no problem with using another APRS app better suited for the platform. Even if there wasn't a lack of Java support for the lower-powered processor on the Pi Zero, it's just too undersized to handle all of YAAC's graphical UI. And a remote station doesn't really need a graphical UI anyway. Andrew, KA2DDO author of YAAC -------- Original message --------
From: Bill WA4OPQ <wa4opq@...> Date: 4/22/20 17:14 (GMT-05:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [yaac-users] APRS-IS passes weather, RF does not I'll always be a YAAC enthusiast, but for a remote wx station I'll probably use aprx on a pi zero.? By copying the weather format from YAAC I've got it sending positionless weather packets and using the digipeater symbol.?? It has a weather packet every ten minutes and a position packet every 30 minutes. So there is no reason (that I can see) that YAAC has to immediately send the weather packet following the position packet. It appears that any reasonable delay is possible. |
Re: APRS-IS passes weather, RF does not
I'll always be a YAAC enthusiast, but for a remote wx station I'll probably use aprx on a pi zero.? By copying the weather format from YAAC I've got it sending positionless weather packets and using the digipeater symbol.?? It has a weather packet every ten minutes and a position packet every 30 minutes. So there is no reason (that I can see) that YAAC has to immediately send the weather packet following the position packet. It appears that any reasonable delay is possible. |
Re: No mobile APRS in YAAC
Ok, thanks!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I’ve not understand it in the mail before. Thanks! Elia, IU2JWM Il giorno 22 apr 2020, alle ore 18:48, Andrew P. <andrewemt@...> ha scritto: |
Re: No mobile APRS in YAAC
Again, the reason you're not seeing the iPhone in YAAC is that:
1. No I-gate station (including yourself) is going to transmit it to RF because the iPhone isn't sending any packets meeting rule#1 or rule#2 (position _after_ a rule#1 text message). 2. The APRS-IS backbone won't send it to your local station because of the same rules, since you are not specifying a filter to cause additional packets to be forwarded that don't meet rule#1 and rule#2. Basically, if you want to monitor traffic on the APRS-IS (instead of just being a minimal-traffic I-gate), you have to specify a APRS-IS port filter expression to include the additional traffic. Note that YAAC does implement the I-gate rules, so it won't forward to RF unnecessary extra Internet traffic caused by filters unless you also specify a supplemental Tx I-gate filter. Andrew, KA2DDO author of YAAC ________________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Elia Origoni <elia.origoni@...> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 12:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [yaac-users] No mobile APRS in YAAC Hi, Is a digipiter plus I-Gate configured in wide1-1. I have the pi-tnc interface and APRS-IS interface. I don’t want to repeat my smartphone beacon trough RF. I only want to understand why I don’t see the beacon icon of my smartphone on the map in YAAC…with all filter disabled, I don’t have to see the same things that I can see on aprs.fi<>? Elia, IU2JWM Il giorno 22 apr 2020, alle ore 14:59, Andrew P. <andrewemt@...<mailto:andrewemt@...>> ha scritto: First off, is your digipeater a digipeater-plus-I-gate, or just a digipeater? Since your iPhone is not a transmitter on ham bands, the only way your Internet-originated APRS packets are going to get to amateur-band RF is via somebody's transmit-capable I-gate. If you don't have a transmit-capable I-gate in the neighborhood, no one is going to put your Internet packets on RF. Secondly, I-gates (and the APRS-IS backbone servers) have some logic within them to keep from flooding the local RF channel with excess traffic. Unless explicitly configured otherwise at the I-gate, traffic will not be sent from the Internet to the I-gate for retransmission on RF unless: 1. the APRS packet is a text message addressed to an RF station reported to the backbone as being heard by that particular I-gate. 2. the APRS packet is a position report from an Internet-relayed station that has just sent a text message meeting rule#1 (so the text message recipient can see where the message sender is located). This is what keeps transmit-capable I-gates from saturating the RF channel with spurious traffic. And the APRS-IS does not know that a connected station is _not_ an I-gate. If it is connected to APRS-IS, then it will be treated like an I-gate, and therefore the rules for sending traffic to an I-gate apply in every backbone server. Traffic is only forwarded to the connected station if rule#1, rule#2, or an explicit filter specification would pass the traffic. And a proper I-gate should enforce the rules too, in case somebody floods the APRS-IS with spurious traffic, or a filter is specified on the connection to APRS-IS. This is why YAAC has the supplemental filter to force additional traffic to RF (above and beyond rule#1 and rule#2 traffic); this capability should be used very carefully and cautiously, as the the RF channel doesn't have much bandwidth. So, send more than just a beacon from your iPhone. Remember, one of the fundamental regulations of amateur radio is that it is two-way communications. Telemetry is an allowed but secondary purpose of amateur radio. Andrew, KA2DDO author of YAAC |
Re: No mobile APRS in YAAC
开云体育Hi,Is a digipiter plus I-Gate configured in wide1-1. I have the pi-tnc interface and APRS-IS interface. I don’t want to repeat my smartphone beacon trough RF. I only want to understand why I don’t see the beacon icon of my smartphone on the map in YAAC…with all filter disabled, I don’t have to see the same things that I can see on ? Elia, IU2JWM
|
Re: No mobile APRS in YAAC
First off, is your digipeater a digipeater-plus-I-gate, or just a digipeater? Since your iPhone is not a transmitter on ham bands, the only way your Internet-originated APRS packets are going to get to amateur-band RF is via somebody's transmit-capable I-gate. If you don't have a transmit-capable I-gate in the neighborhood, no one is going to put your Internet packets on RF.
Secondly, I-gates (and the APRS-IS backbone servers) have some logic within them to keep from flooding the local RF channel with excess traffic. Unless explicitly configured otherwise at the I-gate, traffic will not be sent from the Internet to the I-gate for retransmission on RF unless: 1. the APRS packet is a text message addressed to an RF station reported to the backbone as being heard by that particular I-gate. 2. the APRS packet is a position report from an Internet-relayed station that has just sent a text message meeting rule#1 (so the text message recipient can see where the message sender is located). This is what keeps transmit-capable I-gates from saturating the RF channel with spurious traffic. And the APRS-IS does not know that a connected station is _not_ an I-gate. If it is connected to APRS-IS, then it will be treated like an I-gate, and therefore the rules for sending traffic to an I-gate apply in every backbone server. Traffic is only forwarded to the connected station if rule#1, rule#2, or an explicit filter specification would pass the traffic. And a proper I-gate should enforce the rules too, in case somebody floods the APRS-IS with spurious traffic, or a filter is specified on the connection to APRS-IS. This is why YAAC has the supplemental filter to force additional traffic to RF (above and beyond rule#1 and rule#2 traffic); this capability should be used very carefully and cautiously, as the the RF channel doesn't have much bandwidth. So, send more than just a beacon from your iPhone. Remember, one of the fundamental regulations of amateur radio is that it is two-way communications. Telemetry is an allowed but secondary purpose of amateur radio. Andrew, KA2DDO author of YAAC |
Re: Pi and mobilinkd
开云体育I'm not sure. I've only tested the Bluetooth plugin on Microsoft Windows and Debian Linux (Intel processors). So I don't know which Pi processors the ARM native library will work on.Please, try it on any Pi version you want, and let me know if it does or doesn't work so I can update the documentation. Andrew, KA2DDO -------- Original message --------
From: Jeremy West <ticfifty@...> Date: 4/16/20 17:38 (GMT-05:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [yaac-users] Pi and mobilinkd You said you don't know if the second option would work for pi 4, do you know if it would for the pi 3? It sounds like the second option you gave me would be the more stable if I can make that work would you agree? On Thu, Apr 16, 2020, 7:15 AM Andrew P. <andrewemt@...> wrote: Greetings. |
Re: Pi and mobilinkd
You said you don't know if the second option would work for pi 4, do you know if it would for the pi 3? It sounds like the second option you gave me would be the more stable if I can make that work would you agree? On Thu, Apr 16, 2020, 7:15 AM Andrew P. <andrewemt@...> wrote: Greetings. |
Re: Pi and mobilinkd
Greetings.
You have two options here. If you bind the Mobilinkd TNC to your Pi using their Bluetooth drivers, you can use the Serial_TNC port type. However, if you have Bluetooth connectivity dropouts, this may hang or crash YAAC. Another option is to use the Bluetooth plugin for YAAC and thereby let YAAC manage the Bluetooth connection (and deal with flakiness thereof) with the Bluetooth_TNC port type. It has a limited set of native libraries, so I'm not sure if the included armv5 library will work on a Pi4, but you can try it. No guarantees; I don't own that particular hardware, so I can't test it. Hope this helps. Andrew, KA2DDO author of YAAC |
Re: Coordinates and station location in the map
Thank you Andrew.? That explains that I am entering the wrong format.? I was confused with the DDD MM.SS with DDD MM.mm.? Now entered the DDD MM.mm and it is now in the right location.
I have another question but that will be in another thread perhaps. Best regards, Maximo, DU2UXH |