¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: fldigi CW decoding problems

 

I use PCW Fistcheck all the time to keep in practice twixt on air sessions. I find that it does really well at decoding what my rigs send. I use a straight key 90% of the time, which is why I like the PCWF feedback on my timing. The timing dialog is great for that. I agree that getting CW off the air is another matter, with signal shifts, fading, etc, but I have used PCFW with a local ham on HF, and it was pretty good. In fact, PCWF showed what fldigi could not...

One of the new CW hams was using a keyer, and thinking that he was sending great code. His dits and dahs were great, actually...as you'd expect from a keyer. Problem was that he couldn't send a letter or a word that was generally understandable by ear, so PCWF had no chance. But I copied what PCWF recorded, and sent that to him. He got the message right away, and decided to shift from keyer to straight key until he had a better sense of timing.

I think using fldigi is overkill for these simple tasks, but I understand wanting to use it if the goal is to actually send and receive CW using fldigi.

I occasionally use Morse Expert. It is great at showing just how much the RX CW signal shifts around, and why it is so difficult to machine decode hand sent CW.

73 Rich NE1EE
The Dusty Key
On the banks of the Piscataqua

On 2025-01-25 10:54:, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
RE: No decode on hand sent CW from the K4. Is the monitor audio getting to the computer?


Re: New web hosting site for www.w1hkj

 

Tobias,
The site shows as secure in my browser Google Chrome and MS Edge.? Regards, Phil?
?
?


Re: fldigi CW decoding problems

 

RE: No decode on hand sent CW from the K4. Is the monitor audio getting to the computer? I just checked my K3S feeding my computer as normal and FLDIGI does decode my keyer sent CW. It also decodes my hand sent CW with my straight key. Check your monitor level audio going to the computer and application.

73
Bob, K4TAX


Re: New web hosting site for www.w1hkj

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi Dave,

I had a quick look. The link to fldigi opens a directory with just the help text file in it. The one to flrig has all the files.

73 Phul G3ZZA


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Dave via groups.io <w1hkj25@...>
Sent: 25 January 2025 1:23 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [winfldigi] New web hosting site for www.w1hkj
?
I am in the process of moving the entire w1hkj web site to be hosted at QTH.com.? The new site is

Please visit the site and report any discrepancies, particularly misdirection of links.? fldigi, flrig, etal still need to be modified to reflect this move to the QTH host.

73, David
W1HKJ


Re: New web hosting site for www.w1hkj

 

Thank you.? Fixed both issues.

David


On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 5:59?AM T? via <tsquare123=[email protected]> wrote:
Hello David,

The link to the new site works, but:


I get an alert stating 'the connection is not secure' preventing the access unless I actively override the warning.


Software Version / Dates given seem outdated, e.g.:
fldigi/flarq
4.2.05 / 4.3.9
04/23/2024


Thanks and 73s

Tobias
.-.-.
Am Samstag, 25. Januar 2025 um 02:24:06 MEZ hat Dave via <w1hkj25=[email protected]> Folgendes geschrieben:


that should be


On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 7:23?PM w1hkj <w1hkj25@...> wrote:
I am in the process of moving the entire w1hkj web site to be hosted at QTH.com.? The new site is

Please visit the site and report any discrepancies, particularly misdirection of links.? fldigi, flrig, etal still need to be modified to reflect this move to the QTH host.

73, David
W1HKJ


Re: New web hosting site for www.w1hkj

 

Hello David,

The link to the new site works, but:


I get an alert stating 'the connection is not secure' preventing the access unless I actively override the warning.


Software Version / Dates given seem outdated, e.g.:
fldigi/flarq
4.2.05 / 4.3.9
04/23/2024


Thanks and 73s

Tobias
.-.-.
Am Samstag, 25. Januar 2025 um 02:24:06 MEZ hat Dave via groups.io <w1hkj25@...> Folgendes geschrieben:


that should be


On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 7:23?PM w1hkj <w1hkj25@...> wrote:
I am in the process of moving the entire w1hkj web site to be hosted at QTH.com.? The new site is

Please visit the site and report any discrepancies, particularly misdirection of links.? fldigi, flrig, etal still need to be modified to reflect this move to the QTH host.

73, David
W1HKJ


Re: New web hosting site for www.w1hkj

 

Hello David
?
I found two "issues"
-nanoIO doc link points to https://www.w1hkj.org/files/nanoIO/nanoIO.doc , the file is missing. There is a pdf help file in the directory but the link points to a doc file (this was also missing at the .com website, not something new).
-The Fldigi online manual https://www.w1hkj.org/FldigiHelp/index.html is missing the contents menu on the left (it is OK at the .com website).
?
?
73
Haris
SV1GRB


Re: New web hosting site for www.w1hkj

 

that should be


On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 7:23?PM w1hkj <w1hkj25@...> wrote:
I am in the process of moving the entire w1hkj web site to be hosted at QTH.com.? The new site is

Please visit the site and report any discrepancies, particularly misdirection of links.? fldigi, flrig, etal still need to be modified to reflect this move to the QTH host.

73, David
W1HKJ


New web hosting site for www.w1hkj

 

I am in the process of moving the entire w1hkj web site to be hosted at QTH.com.? The new site is

Please visit the site and report any discrepancies, particularly misdirection of links.? fldigi, flrig, etal still need to be modified to reflect this move to the QTH host.

73, David
W1HKJ


Re: fldigi CW decoding problems

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks Bob,

Once upon a time I tried to get Fldigi to copy my hand sent morse. I eventually managed it. I've looked at the algorithm and indeed have coded into a keyer/decoder I built using an Arduino. The algorithm works fine with a pure digital on-off signal. However trying to isolate the on-off signal from the audio pass-band was more problematic. The DSP requirements were beyond the capabilities of the Arduino.

Your comment on the effects of the filter are very relevant. When I use fldigi on-air as a back-up to head copy, it fails dramatically. Head copy requires a narrowish filter. Too narrow and the ringing even makes head copy difficult. Fldigi, as you said, needs a wider filter.

73 Phil GM3ZZA


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Bob McGraw - K4TAX <rmcgraw@...>
Sent: 24 January 2025 7:13 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [winfldigi] fldigi CW decoding problems
?
A study of the on-line documentation for starters.?? Forget trying to decode hand sent elements.? Computer sent elements decode just fine.?? There is no anticipatory algorithm that tells FLDIGI what's coming next.?? Head copy is always superior to computer copy.?? If you are expecting the computer to do the decoding for all CW signals, forget it, it won't happen.?? Good code equals good copy.? Poor sent code equal's poor copy.

Don't get the receiver bandwidth too narrow as filters can ring, thus contribute to poor copy.? I normally run 1.0 to 1.5 kHz receiver BW.

I find FLDIGI to be one of the better CW decoding applications.? In fact I use it with N1MM as the CW engine.?? I have HRD, MixW4, CW Get, and a couple of other CW applications.?? Each has their merits.???? My Elecraft K3S does an excellent job decoding CW signals........if the parameters, threshold, etc. are correctly adjusted.?

It takes patience and lots of trial and error, along with understanding of signal and band noise relationships.?? There is NO one setting that will make it always great.

73
Bob, K4TAX






Re: fldigi CW decoding problems

 

Bob
Thank you for all the information. I want to use Fldigi to monitor my sending on line and for practice. I have a K4 and have the same capture/playback choices entered in Fldigi that I have in PCWFistcheck. I am seeing the audio in PCWFistcheck and it decodes the sent code. In Fldigi, I am seeing no audio at all in the program windows. So am thinking there are one or two settings in Fldigi that? I have incorrect. Any hints??
?
73 Paul w2eck


Re: fldigi CW decoding problems

 

A study of the on-line documentation for starters. Forget trying to decode hand sent elements. Computer sent elements decode just fine. There is no anticipatory algorithm that tells FLDIGI what's coming next. Head copy is always superior to computer copy. If you are expecting the computer to do the decoding for all CW signals, forget it, it won't happen. Good code equals good copy. Poor sent code equal's poor copy.

Don't get the receiver bandwidth too narrow as filters can ring, thus contribute to poor copy. I normally run 1.0 to 1.5 kHz receiver BW.

I find FLDIGI to be one of the better CW decoding applications. In fact I use it with N1MM as the CW engine. I have HRD, MixW4, CW Get, and a couple of other CW applications. Each has their merits. My Elecraft K3S does an excellent job decoding CW signals........if the parameters, threshold, etc. are correctly adjusted.

It takes patience and lots of trial and error, along with understanding of signal and band noise relationships. There is NO one setting that will make it always great.

73
Bob, K4TAX


Re: fldigi CW decoding problems

 

does Fldigi decode or copy what you are sending?
73 Paul w2eck


Re: Multiple instance question

 

Jack,

The thing is if the transmitter is transmitting then receiving anything and missing an ACK is still going to be possible, as the other station transmitting the ACK may not be monitoring the beacon signal to know that reception isn't possible.

Robert


Re: Multiple instance question

 

True,

But having looked at the mode and frequency that was selected gave me the impression of concurrent transmitting. Thou that is a good idea that one might be able to enable a mutex lock/unlock using XLMRPC interface.

Robert


Re: Multiple instance question

Mike Black
 

This is known in the programming world as a mutex and could be done in fldigi using the pthread mutexes.

Mike W9MDB


Re: Multiple instance question

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Robert,
Thanks for adding in your thoughts. I would not want to see a blanket "ignore" but rather a way to say in effect "instance fldigi_2, wait and queue the transmission for sending as the current transmission is cleared by CAT command from instance fldigi_1. There might be an important "ACK" or answer lost .
73
Jack Spitznagel
KD4IZ
FM19oo
Parkton, MD


On 1/23/2025 2:58 PM, Robert, KK5VD via groups.io wrote:

Dave, 

Seems to me the arbitrator would be FLRIG. FLRIG would need away to determine if there is more then one instance of FLDIGI running and at that point ignore any additional transmit requests if one is already active. Audio mixing hopefully is handled by all operation systems that FLDIGI supports.

Might want to consider having a transmit/disable transmit counter that way if you receive 2 transmit requests you will wait for 2 end transmit before calling the transmit ended.

Just a few thoughts that popped in my head after reading the issue/request.

Robert









Re: Multiple instance question

 

Dave,

Seems to me the arbitrator would be FLRIG. FLRIG would need away to determine if there is more then one instance of FLDIGI running and at that point ignore any additional transmit requests if one is already active. Audio mixing hopefully is handled by all operation systems that FLDIGI supports.

Might want to consider having a transmit/disable transmit counter that way if you receive 2 transmit requests you will wait for 2 end transmit before calling the transmit ended.

Just a few thoughts that popped in my head after reading the issue/request.

Robert


Re: FLDIGI Hanging (crashing or hangs up)

 

Hi Jack (KD4IZ)m
?
I try after a longer time again. This one 4.2.06....
The crash or hangup still exist.
?
If possible by the user, first Page he hangs up or crash.
If I am super lucky, I come to the Point of the Sound card, last hang up or crash.
?
Not possible to enter, finish the setup.
Always, I can kill the Process.
?
Kind regards
Christian (HB9TH jr. )


Re: Multiple instance question

 

Hi Jack,

Your request does make sense, and you are the first one to request this type of function.? I'll look at code changes (probably all in fldigi).

David


On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:30?PM Jack Spitznagel (KD4IZ) via <kd4iz=[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Dave,

A group of us are testing various ways to use multiple instances of fldigi (current alpha version) that include some automatic modes.

I have "discovered" that if I run 2 fldigi instances in the following manner there is potential for a "key up collision" that leaves the connections confused:

IC-7300 - dial freq 7.1025MHz
fldigi (instance 1) THOR22 @ 2000Hz
fldigi (instance 2) FSQ @1500Hz Beacon enabled
flrig 1 instance controlling transceiver - both fldigi instances using it

THOR22 is being used as data channel for FSQ network works well and is stable. PSM is engaged.

I added in an APRS client (PinPoint) by? TCP/IP connection to fldigi instance 1. THOR22 is used as the transport layer for the APRS packet.

If FSQ sounds and the APRS client beacons concurrently the transmit attempts to overlap. While sound is generated concurrently, the extra overlapping commands confuse the transceiver and flrig. Unpredictable things begin to happen during the transmission. This is not surprising. I have tried force the "collision" without PSM engaged and I get the same result.

Now, I had innocently hoped that the fldigi PSM function included a way to sense and inform flrig of the second concurrent transmit request and tell the other fldigi instance to wait until after the first sound or beacon had completed. The PSM settings would determine the wait time before the second transmission request is made. Rather obviously that is not the case.

Is such a "arbiter function" possible? How difficult would that function be to code? My C coding skills are to rudimentary and too rusty for me to even contemplate doing that with the flrig and fldigi code.

To simplify the use case: Looking for a way for a single instance of flrig to signal multiple instances of fldigi using it that the transceiver is in TX mode already and to wait until after the transmission is done before sending the next TX request.

The response would be similar to the squelch function and PSM. Thanks in advance for thinking through my inquiry with me and hope it made sens.

Jack Spitznagel
KD4IZ
FM19oo
Parkton, MD