¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Moving macros #macros

 

Do you mean right-click on the macro button which brings up the editor??

Nate? N2ADD


Re: #fldigi Weather Macro #fldigi

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

John,

You can create macros for other stations without changing your default configuration.

<WX:xxxx> = get weather data for station.

You would have to know the 4 digit code for the other stations.

73, Ron NY3J

On 6/2/21 11:09 AM, Al Massaro KF5SMH wrote:

The other day we had severe Tstorms and Tornadoes in our state, it would have been handy to have ability to check the Wx at the incoming track stations while maintaining the local setup. Yes I can change the ICAO designator back and forth, just would be nice to have an alternative station(s) available.
--
AL M
KF5SMH


Re: Cw help

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

In most new rigs, the dial frequency is the actual frequency on transmit if you are using either CW-L or CW-U ¨C the rig takes care of the audio tone and mode when calculating dial frequency. If you are using USB or USB-D with MCW (keyed audio) then the actual frequency is dial frequency plus your audio frequency.

?

73 Phil GM3ZZA

?

Sent from for Windows 10

?

From: Mel Marcus
Sent: 02 June 2021 15:35
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [winfldigi] Cw help

?

interesting question if at 14000 and you operate CW-U you would still be legal? , correct?

?

Mel?

NE9A

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of K3EUI Barry via groups.io <k3euibarry@...>
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 7:20 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [winfldigi] Cw help

?

Oh... ?one more observation.

Why is the rig set to a VFO dial frequency of ? 14.000000 MHz ?
Any CW signal puts you OUT of the ham band lower edge

de ?k3eui

?


Re: #fldigi Weather Macro #fldigi

 

The other day we had severe Tstorms and Tornadoes in our state, it would have been handy to have ability to check the Wx at the incoming track stations while maintaining the local setup. Yes I can change the ICAO designator back and forth, just would be nice to have an alternative station(s) available.
--
AL M
KF5SMH


Re: Cw help

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

CW is an amplitude modulated signal with sidebands that extend out below and above the carrier.? The shape and power density of the sidebands is a function of keying speed and keying waveshape.? This is what the spectrum of a 20 WPM CW signal with a 4 msec rise and fall time looks like:



To insure that no lower sideband energy greater than 30 dB below the carrier was outside of the band edge you would have to put the carrier about 100 Hertz about the band edge, 14000.100.

73, David, W1HKJ

On 6/2/21 9:35 AM, Mel Marcus wrote:

interesting question if at 14000 and you operate CW-U you would still be legal? , correct?

Mel?
NE9A

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of K3EUI Barry via groups.io <k3euibarry@...>
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 7:20 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [winfldigi] Cw help
?
Oh... ?one more observation.

Why is the rig set to a VFO dial frequency of ? 14.000000 MHz ?
Any CW signal puts you OUT of the ham band lower edge

de ?k3eui


Re: Cw help

Mel Marcus
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

interesting question if at 14000 and you operate CW-U you would still be legal? , correct?

Mel?
NE9A


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of K3EUI Barry via groups.io <k3euibarry@...>
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 7:20 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [winfldigi] Cw help
?
Oh... ?one more observation.

Why is the rig set to a VFO dial frequency of ? 14.000000 MHz ?
Any CW signal puts you OUT of the ham band lower edge

de ?k3eui


Re: FLDIGI 4.1.18 watefall fft different from previous versions

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

There are some small differences in waterfall processing between 4.1.14 and the current alpha 4.1.18.40.? The changes were made specifically to improve CPU performance and to make the waterfall appearance independent of modem sampling rate.? You can expect that the waterfall appearance at FAST drop down will not be as distinct as NORMAL, and NORMAL not distinct as SLOW.? This is a result of latency reduction.? The waterfall is a time/amplitude representation of the audio spectrum computed using a Fast Fourier Transform.? The sample set size for the SLOW, NORMAL and FAST drop rates vary by 4x, 2x and 1x respectively and the computation cycle changes by 1x, 2x, 4x.? The latency is selected to give a quality view in the NORMAL drop rate.



SLOW drop rate
WF expanded to 4x


NORMAL drop rate
WF expanded to 4x


FAST drop rate
WF expanded to 4x

Image is an Rx capture of a generated transmit wav file, CQ CQ CQ DE W1HKJ K, psk31 mode.

The purpose of the waterfall is to provide s visual assist to signal mode identification and acquisition.? It is not an analytical tool.? fldigi does have a signal analysis tool available, menu item "View/Spectrum scope"



Shown above for the same signal.

I can assist you with where in the code to make changes If you are interested in testing your display and cpu usage for various amount of FFT latency.? You will have to compile fldigi for your testing.? The fldigi wiki provide information on how to on various operating systems and computer platforms.

73, David, W1HKJ


Re: #fldigi Weather Macro #fldigi

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Roland,

<WX:EDDK> works OK.



The original poster's problem was caused by entering in lieu of "https://..." for the Access URL.

David

On 6/2/21 4:03 AM, roland.hartmann@... wrote:

Maybe helpful to locate the issue¡­

I have also fldigi 4.1.18 and tried a little bit.

What is working: <WX> without additional parameter. I tried KMDQ? (default) and EDDK (near to my location). Has to be set in the WX-Configuration part.

Not working is, if I try? <WX:KMDQ> or <WX:EDDK>. Equal if the same or another value is set in the WX-configuration part.

Seems giving the parameter do not working ?

?

73 de Roland DK4RH

?

Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von Dave
Gesendet: Dienstag, 1. Juni 2021 02:40
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [winfldigi] #fldigi Weather Macro

?

Older versiions and grasping at straws ... neither will solve the problem.

Send me a copy of this file "fldigi_def.xml".? Find it easily by using the fldigi menu item "File/Folders/Fldigi config ...".? Send it to my bellsouth.net address.

David

On 5/29/21 7:57 AM, David Tucker wrote:

Well I did a re-install and it didnt work. Do u have copies of the older versions?? May try that and see what happens.

?

?



Re: Cw help

Steve
 


Barry? just took picture of rig and I'm authorized to operate outside band as a Mars station??
may the God and Goddess grant you peace and tranquility all of you days

On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 7:20, K3EUI Barry
<k3euibarry@...> wrote:
Oh... ?one more observation.

Why is the rig set to a VFO dial frequency of ? 14.000000 MHz ?
Any CW signal puts you OUT of the ham band lower edge

de ?k3eui


Re: Cw help

 

Oh... ?one more observation.

Why is the rig set to a VFO dial frequency of ? 14.000000 MHz ?
Any CW signal puts you OUT of the ham band lower edge

de ?k3eui


Re: Cw help

 

?A few comments on sending/receiving CW ?with FLDIGI

1) ?The waterfall display settings ?(-25, 70) only affect what you see on the FLDIGI waterfall.
? ? They do NOT alter what the sound card hears for CW decoding.
? ?The waterfall is only a visual aid.

2) Try turning OFF ?the ?AFC ?option ?(lower right) and see if that helps put proper print on screen.
? ?I notice AFC on some other digital modes often keeps "searching" for the center, wanders off the sender's frequency, and can't find its way back. ?That reminds me of when I search for my car in a parking lot and I can't remember where I parked! ?What is my search algorithm?

3) Try copying W1AW ?CW bulletins at night.
? ? When I tune in to ?3581.5 at night (over S9) FLDIGI copies nearly 100% at all speeds.

Experiment with changing the radio's ?IF filter bandwidth. Don't make it too narrow.
Let FLDGI sound card do the "filtering".

I also find that FLDIGI copies just as well when my radio is in USB mode, not CW.
Of course, FLDIGI is in CW mode.
The pitch may change a bit compared to the CW offset pitch of 400-700 Hz.
So just move your VFO up/down a bit to "center the audio" where you want it.
When I operate CW but with radio in USB mode, I try to keep the pitch set to about 1000 Hz on the FLDIGI wterfall
Surprisingly, if I keep the ALC to zero when I transmit, I can send perfect CW by keying the AUDIO in the sound card with my keyboard, and with my rig in USB mode. ?The receiving station of course does not know this, nor cares HOW I generate the dits/dahs.

Writing software to decode CW must be difficult, since the noise comes in pulses, especially on 80m.
Does setting the "noise reduction" digital filter to ON help any with CW?

I've had no problems with CW on any of my Icom rigs with rig in CW or USB.
I also set the sound level input to around ?-20dB ?

de ?k3eui
Barry


Re: #fldigi Weather Macro #fldigi

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Maybe helpful to locate the issue¡­

I have also fldigi 4.1.18 and tried a little bit.

What is working: <WX> without additional parameter. I tried KMDQ? (default) and EDDK (near to my location). Has to be set in the WX-Configuration part.

Not working is, if I try? <WX:KMDQ> or <WX:EDDK>. Equal if the same or another value is set in the WX-configuration part.

Seems giving the parameter do not working ?

?

73 de Roland DK4RH

?

Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von Dave
Gesendet: Dienstag, 1. Juni 2021 02:40
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [winfldigi] #fldigi Weather Macro

?

Older versiions and grasping at straws ... neither will solve the problem.

Send me a copy of this file "fldigi_def.xml".? Find it easily by using the fldigi menu item "File/Folders/Fldigi config ...".? Send it to my bellsouth.net address.

David

On 5/29/21 7:57 AM, David Tucker wrote:

Well I did a re-install and it didnt work. Do u have copies of the older versions?? May try that and see what happens.

?

?


Re: FLDIGI 4.1.18 watefall fft different from previous versions

 

I don't know Dave, my setting were very close to yours (tried also exactly the same ones) but a difference with waterfall of 4.1.14 is clearly visibile.
I attach a screenshot with fft averaging disabled in both versions, the issue is noticeable in the same way.+
I'm using Win7 64 bit with discrete Nvidia GeForce210.

Since your screenshot shows "normal" waterfall speed, I have tested setting speed to "normal" in both versions instead of "fast", and the waterfall are much more similar, very very close. But using fast speed situation looks different.

I attach also a couple of screenshots taken with normal and fast speed setting, where the different appearance of the waterfall could be more easy to visualize.

73 de Phil, iz1fks


Re: FLDIGI 4.1.18 watefall fft different from previous versions

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

My hardware and OS are not the same as yours, but there is no reason why the latest alpha should not give similar performance on your system

? waterfall set to 2x

Lubuntu 20.1
ThinkCenter m90p computer, using sysem Intel video system
1920x1080 LG monitor

waterfall parameters set to



73, David, W1HKJ

On 6/1/21 2:39 PM, iz1fks wrote:

thanks very much for your reply Dave. I have installed 4.1.18.40 but I don't see any difference in waterfall comparing with 4.1.18.0 (same settings of course) I'm
still with 4.1.14 with better waterfall
I attach a screenshot with a comparison 4.1.18.40 (left) and 4.1.14 (right) even it's not so clear the difference as it's seeing the waterfall moving.

thanks and 73 de Phil, iz1fks


Re: Cw help

 

One thing I see is that the squelch function seems not to be turned on.? It filters the gibberish that your fldigi is otherwise required to 'interpret'.

Set sql? to ON? and set the level such that only the Sent Code that you want to hear,? is interpreted by fldigi as Heard Code.? Anything below the level you set will be ignored.? It's a bit of a dance!

That may blow away much of the "chaff".


Re: Fldigi Audio Error "Port Audio Device not available" After Recent Windows 10 Update

 

I am having this problem but now it is June of 2021 and I am on the latest version of Windows.? The Flex works OK otherwise.? I have not tried FLDigi for many months.? I have checked Privacy and all are enabled there OK.? What now?


Re: FLDIGI 4.1.18 watefall fft different from previous versions

 

thanks very much for your reply Dave. I have installed 4.1.18.40 but I cannot see difference coparing with 4.1.18.0 with same settings of course.
I'm still with 4.1.14 that has a better waterfall resolution.

I attach a screenshot with 4.1.18.40 on the left and 4.1.14 on the right, even if it's not so clear as when the waterfall is moving.

thanks and 73 de Phil,iz1fks


Re: Cw help

Steve
 



Ed I was referring to my display on radio? see pic

may the God and Goddess grant you peace and tranquility all of you days

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 11:58, Ed W3NR
<autek@...> wrote:
Fldigi? does not display RF gain, you need to have rig control to control rf gain. Now you are seriously over driving the sound card input. I suggested -10 and 70 to start.

Ed W3NR






Re: Cw help

 

Fldigi does not display RF gain, you need to have rig control to control rf gain. Now you are seriously over driving the sound card input. I suggested -10 and 70 to start.

Ed W3NR


Re: Cw help

Steve
 

Ed my rig is an alinco dx8srt? on display on radio rf is lowest? -20? filter is narrow?

may the God and Goddess grant you peace and tranquility all of you days

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:27, Ed W3NR
<autek@...> wrote:
Change the -25 and 70 to -10 and 70 for a start. What do you have your filter set to ?? Turn your RF gain back some. Looks to me that you have your gain maxed out.

Ed W3NR