¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Painting

Merl
 

Kendal Jackson wrote:

From: Kendal Jackson <jacksoti@...>

I was just wondering how many of you out there have painted your own
vehicles. I am seriously considering it but am unclear if it is worth it. I
mean, does it cost you more in the long run? Is the frustration of mistakes
enough to just pay someone to do it no matter what the cost?

I would really appreciate hearing your success/horror stories before I think
too far down this path.

Also, what are some good resources for learning how to do it properly?

Kendal Jackson
--It might look like I'm doing nothing, but at the cellular level I'm
really quite busy--
Reed gives some excellent advice. I'll add that I'm painting my
M38A1 now, its sort of an ongoing thing. The reasons I went this
way were...

- "Some assembly required" on my project. Lots of little bits and
pieces, all supposed to be olive drab. The only way I could figure
to get all of these pieces painted (without doing it myself) would be
to take it all in a giant pile to a paint shop, get them painted, and
work out some type of storage system where I can keep them safe from
harm until I'm ready for that part. I can just imagine the look on
a painter's face if I'd brought in all of these separate
pieces and parts loaded in the back of my pickup... body tub, fenders,
every small plate and screw piled high in boxes... Just like a cartoon
his eyeballs would turn into dollar signs. Doing it myself I can do
a little at a time, and not have to store and worry about messing up
a part that got painted a month ago that I haven't gotten around to
putting on yet.
- Reassembly gotchas causing scratches & gouges. Considering the
number of thumbs I have this is inevitable, but I can also go back
and fix them myself.
- Attention to detail. I can also see those dollar signs racking up
when I tell the paint guy to "be extra careful when you paint the
bezels of the gauges, and don't get any paint on this bit of rubber
or that bit of glass" etc, etc.
- Military paint is cheap. $30 per gallon. In effect I can buy 3-5
gallons of this stuff for the price of one gallon of "normal" paint.
- Intended use. I intend to take this thing into the bush and I'm
not going to baby it. Being able to use a matching color rattle can
to make the latest scratch or scrape less noticeable or less prone to
rust really appeals to my cheesier nature. (The military colors come
in matching rattle cans, the Gilespe brand has a very good match with
the color that comes by the gallon.)

Like Reed says, don't expect professional results. But I'd also
add that this isn't brain surgery we're talking about and if I
can do it anyone can. My results are not professional but only
you, I, and the professional painters know that (don't tell anyone
on the WillysTech list, they think my last name is Schieb!).
Joe Dailycommuter can't tell a difference.

If you plan to paint more than one vehicle one time or simply
WANT to do it yourself go for it. If its just a one shot thing
and/or you want to be able to use your glassy smooth finish as a
mirror for shaving then have a professional do it.
--

"Never pound on the threaded ****
end of *anything*!" ** **
** mailto:hollowel@... **
Merl ****


Introduction ...

Jordan Franklin
 

Hello All ...

I finally have worked up the nerve to introduce myself, after a period
of silently spying on the list. I have a '54 (based on the serial
number) pickup. The truck came to me, here in the land of the
cheeseheads, by way of some horse trading my father-in-law pulled
off in Montana. It seems to be more or less complete. The motor
(an F134) was seized but upon disassembly freed-up. The poor thing
had suffered a bad case of indigestion from what appeared to be, from
the pit marks in the number four piston and head, a lock washer. It is
amazing how those parts can get through an air filter, isn't it?

My aim is to rehabilitate the truck so my sons can drive it when the
time comes, I only have four years so I best get at it, huh?

Now for the real reason the waves of intestinal foritude have overcome
my fears of public redicule for asking dumb questions or worse yet
making even dumber remarks, the QUEST FOR KNOWLEDGE. I will try to
hold it to just a few questions for now. Well here goes.

1) When I pulled the head from the previously mentioned F-head, I found
two, count'em two, head gaskets neatly squashed in place. This made me
wonder, was the block or head planed?, was the extra gasket there for
piston to head clearance?, or did somebody forget to pull the old one?
I went to the "Service Manual for 'Jeep' Utility Vehicles" I got from
Orginal Reproductions but was unable to find mention of the crankshaft
to deck height or the piston to head clearance. Can I measure the block
or head some how to determine if they have been planed? At top dead
center where should the piston be in relation to the top of the block?

I need to find out if the block can be salvaged or if other option
must be considered.

2) Since I have the motor out and I thought now would be a good time
to evaluate the condition of the transmission and the transfer case.
Since the thing came to me in "not-running" condition, I don't know
if it squacked, werred, or made any other noise. I don't really want
to disassemble the things if I don't have to but can I get a sense of
the condition of the thing?

Thanks in advance ...

Jordan


Re: series of A's

Mark May
 

On the F-head block the factory stamped letters on the deck adjacent to
each cylinder. I assumed they were related to customizing the rings at
the factory for when the machine shop "oversizes" that particular
cylinder. My F-head blocks have mostly B's and C's.

Mark
(4) F-heads and a 304


For Sale 1942 Ford GPW

 

FYI, I got this from my West Coast Willys email group.

Jim
56 PU L6 226
CA


wagon post

bmagee
 



51 wagon in Missouri 1000.00


Re: Teenagers

Kendal Jackson
 

Most of you may no know this but I bought Hugh for my teenage daughter so
that she would not destroy our Toyota. I think it the perfect car for a
first time driver. Wont go fast, so solid that I truly pity anything that it
gets in an accident with and it has a cool factor that cant be beat (at
least for me).

She of course wants a '57 pink Caddilac convertible.

Kendal Jackson
--It might look like I'm doing nothing, but at the cellular level I'm
really quite busy--


Re: How do you remove the OD

Kendal Jackson
 

At 08:56 AM 6/22/99 -0700, you wrote:
Next time you change the oil in the xfer you might try using the
AMSOIL 80/90. Expensive but seems to make things whisper quiet!
Rob
I have been searching high and low for this product. Where are you getting it?

Kendal Jackson
--It might look like I'm doing nothing, but at the cellular level I'm
really quite busy--


Re: Buick 225/231 front axle clearance, now burst oil filter

Bill Lagler
 

"K. R." wrote:

From: "K. R." <kr98664@...>

--- Bill Lagler <wbl@...> wrote:
From: Bill Lagler <wbl@...>

Chuck Pedretti wrote:

From: Chuck Pedretti <ChuckP@...>

A question for those of you with factory and
repower Buick V6's in your
CJ's. How much clearance do you have between the
crank pulley and axle
pumpkin. A picture of mine is at
http:&#92;&#92;staff.magenic.com&#92;chuckp&#92;engine.htm
at the bottom (note the custom oak tierod :) I am
running a 2.5" lift and
was suprised at how close to the axle the pully
is. It probabally won't hit
but I though I'd check to see what is normal.
snip

Dear V6 Owners,

I came across this in an automotive textbook recently
and thought you might be interested.

"The relief valve on Jeep V6 engines frequently
becomes stuck in the closed position when driving
off-road. This is caused by the front axle housing
rising and denting the aluminim timing chain cover
which contains the oil pump assembly. The result is a
burst oil filter"

Copied from Automotive Engine Rebuilding, by James G.
Hughes. It sounds like your engine may be a bit
further back, closer to the pulley instead of the
cover. Be careful either way. The burst V6 oil
filter sounds vaguely familiar from the WT list
several months ago. That could interesting really
quickly.
AFAIK this only happens to swapped in V6's, not the factory
installed ones. The problem is with the direction of the
oil filter mount. From memory (maybe not quite right) the
OEM V6 has the filter coming off the right front corner
of the motor at about a 45 deg angle but level. Most of
the car engines have the filter pointed more straight
forward, 30 deg maybe, and angled down, right at the front
pumpkin. Hit a good bump and suddenly you're pumping your
oil on the ground.

I'll take a look at my jeeps tonight and try to get
some measurments.

Bill
47cj2a, swapped in V6
70CJ5, factory V6


Master Cylinder

Gary Parobeck
 

When I got my 63 CJ5 it was in pieces. Took three trips to get it home. I am in the process of restoring it and putting it back together. My current puzzle is the master cylinder. It was completely a part, the bushings, springs, etc were all gone. The rebuild kit I have doesn't include assembly details. My manual only includes the assembly for the Double Safety Master Cylinder. Mine is the old single cylinder that bolts to the frame under the floor. I have it together but have one part left over and I am not sure where it goes. It is a small rubber washer about 1" outside dia. 1/2" inside diameter and 1/8" thick. I can't seem to find the right spot for this and the assembly is packed in so tightly already I am not sure if it is required. Any help? Do any of you have an assembly drawing for this type of cylinder?


Re: Buick 225/231 front axle clearance, now burst oil filter

Chuck Pedretti
 

Sounds fun, I am already planning on a remote filter because it looks like
the oil filter may hit the front differential on full compression. I don't
think that I have to worry about the timing cover hitting, It is behind the
axle.

"The relief valve on Jeep V6 engines frequently
becomes stuck in the closed position when driving
off-road. This is caused by the front axle housing
rising and denting the aluminim timing chain cover
which contains the oil pump assembly. The result is a
burst oil filter"
_________________________________
Chuck Pedretti MCSD, MCSE
Consultant
Magenic Technologies
mailto:chuckp@...
_________________________________

(46 CJ)
_________________________________


Re: Buick 225/231 front axle clearance

Chuck Pedretti
 

I wish I'd measured mine while it was in. I stuck it in temporarily to get
the motor mount locations marked, took some pictures but forgot to take out
the tape measure.

_________________________________
Chuck Pedretti MCSD, MCSE
Consultant
Magenic Technologies
mailto:chuckp@...
_________________________________

(46 CJ)
_________________________________

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Lagler [mailto:wbl@...]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 6:51 AM
To: WillysTech@...
Subject: Re: [WT] Buick 225/231 front axle clearance


From: Bill Lagler <wbl@...>

Chuck Pedretti wrote:

From: Chuck Pedretti <ChuckP@...>

A question for those of you with factory and repower Buick V6's in
your
CJ's. How much clearance do you have between the crank pulley and
axle
pumpkin. A picture of mine is at
http:&#92;&#92;staff.magenic.com&#92;chuckp&#92;engine.htm
at the bottom (note the custom oak tierod :) I am running
a 2.5" lift
and
was suprised at how close to the axle the pully is. It probabally
won't hit
but I though I'd check to see what is normal.

Got my 2nd hand AA engine mounts and they look great as long as the
part
which mounts to the frame is inverted.
I'll try to get some measurements from both of mine tonight.

Bill
47cj2a
--------------------------------------------------------------
----------
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
WillysTech

NEW! Parts Buy/Sell/Swap Board

Vehicle FAQ Sheets

Parts Resource List

_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/


Re: starter bushing removal

K. R.
 

--- Arne Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Arne Anderson <[email protected]>

anybody have any tips on removing the starter
bushing from the bellhousing on a
l-head 134. Any suggestions are greatly
appreciated. Thanks

arne
Dear Arne,

In the 2A FAQ's, there is a little info, under the
engine section. The two methods mentioned are either
a puller set, or some of them have a hole on the
backside allowing you to use a brass drift.

Assuming you don't have a puller set, or a convenient
hole for a brass drift, here is one more option. Get
a dowel which is a close fit inside the bushing. Wrap
it with electrical tape until you can get a nice snug
fit. Put a little grease in the bottom of the bushing
cavity. Insert this handy dandy tool and percuss
lightly with your favorite hammer. The hydraulic
action in a closed chamber will usually free the
bushing.

I've used this on clutch pilot bearings, etc. and can
vouch for it. The tighter a fit you can get the
better. Place a rag over it in case some grease
shoots out. There is even a fancy version available
somewhere which has various size locking plugs with
zerks on them, and use you use a grease gun for the
hydraulic pressure. But this method is almost free.

Hope this helps,
Vern
48 CJ2A in Vancouver, WA
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at


Re: Spicer T 18 case

 

In a message dated 6/22/99 12:22:23 PM Central Daylight Time, grover@...
writes:

<<
I don't want to confuse people, but this is a retitle of a divergent
thread...

Morris,

Do you know which vehicles had the 1-1/8" verses the 1-1/4" intermediate
shaft? I have a Spicer 18 in my 49 pickup which I am assuming would be the
earlier 1 1/8". It is in good shape (I think). I have a Spicer 18 in my 1960
wagon that I am hoping is the 1 1/4". The wagon has a 302 and I'm
considering swapping the T-90 to something stronger. The t-case has slack in
it. I know this is bad. :-(

Since the wagon is currently my daily driver, I was thinking of pulling the
t-case from the pickup and putting it into the wagon, while I take time to
rebuild the wagon's t-case. I am considering doing the AA bearing upgrade.
All this assumes that the t-case in the wagon is the larger shaft version
that stands a better chance of taking the power of the 302. Otherwise, I
think I should be looking for a different t-case.

I guess it will be obvious when I get brave enough to actually start pulling
gear boxes out. I hate to get my daily driver apart to discover I can't put
it back on the road immediately. (It gives fuel to the other side in the
family debate about the reasonableness of buying old Jeeps.)

Rick G. in AZ
>>

Rick,
It's easy to tell which T-case you have by taking ruler under there with you
and measure the width of the intermediate shaft. They are easy to get to
from the rear without removing anything and there's enough difference in size
that they would be hard to confuse. The intermediate shaft is the one in the
middle with the keeper.

Thanks again for the plug on your web page.

Rick S (TX)


Re: Buick 225/231 front axle clearance, now burst oil filter

K. R.
 

--- Bill Lagler <wbl@...> wrote:
From: Bill Lagler <wbl@...>

Chuck Pedretti wrote:

From: Chuck Pedretti <ChuckP@...>

A question for those of you with factory and
repower Buick V6's in your
CJ's. How much clearance do you have between the
crank pulley and axle
pumpkin. A picture of mine is at
http:&#92;&#92;staff.magenic.com&#92;chuckp&#92;engine.htm
at the bottom (note the custom oak tierod :) I am
running a 2.5" lift and
was suprised at how close to the axle the pully
is. It probabally won't hit
but I though I'd check to see what is normal.
snip

Dear V6 Owners,

I came across this in an automotive textbook recently
and thought you might be interested.

"The relief valve on Jeep V6 engines frequently
becomes stuck in the closed position when driving
off-road. This is caused by the front axle housing
rising and denting the aluminim timing chain cover
which contains the oil pump assembly. The result is a
burst oil filter"

Copied from Automotive Engine Rebuilding, by James G.
Hughes. It sounds like your engine may be a bit
further back, closer to the pulley instead of the
cover. Be careful either way. The burst V6 oil
filter sounds vaguely familiar from the WT list
several months ago. That could interesting really
quickly.

Hope this helps,
Vern
48 CJ2A in Vancouver, WA
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at


starter bushing removal

Arne Anderson
 

anybody have any tips on removing the starter bushing from the bellhousing on a
l-head 134. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thanks

arne


Re: 53 m38a1 gear ratio

Mark May
 

the easiest way to determine axle ratio is to jack up one rear wheel,
put the tranny in neutral, mark both the tire and driveshaft. rotate
the tire about 20 times and count the number of times the driveshaft
rotates. axle ratio is driveshaft rotations divided by wheel rotations,
and multiply this number by two. that is your axle ratio.

i believe all cj's before the v6's came along in 65 were 5.38 gears.
someone correct me if i'm wrong.

mark may


Re: Spicer T 18 case

Richard Grover
 

I don't want to confuse people, but this is a retitle of a divergent
thread...

Morris,

Do you know which vehicles had the 1-1/8" verses the 1-1/4" intermediate
shaft? I have a Spicer 18 in my 49 pickup which I am assuming would be the
earlier 1 1/8". It is in good shape (I think). I have a Spicer 18 in my 1960
wagon that I am hoping is the 1 1/4". The wagon has a 302 and I'm
considering swapping the T-90 to something stronger. The t-case has slack in
it. I know this is bad. :-(

Since the wagon is currently my daily driver, I was thinking of pulling the
t-case from the pickup and putting it into the wagon, while I take time to
rebuild the wagon's t-case. I am considering doing the AA bearing upgrade.
All this assumes that the t-case in the wagon is the larger shaft version
that stands a better chance of taking the power of the 302. Otherwise, I
think I should be looking for a different t-case.

I guess it will be obvious when I get brave enough to actually start pulling
gear boxes out. I hate to get my daily driver apart to discover I can't put
it back on the road immediately. (It gives fuel to the other side in the
family debate about the reasonableness of buying old Jeeps.)

Rick G. in AZ

-----Original Message-----
From: Morris G. Hill [mailto:mgh@...]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 10:10 PM
To: WillysTech@...
Subject: Re: [WT] How do you remove the OD


From: "Morris G. Hill" <mgh@...>

I think the 1-1/8" hole can be enlarged by a machine shop, though I
have not tried having that operation done. I think the 1-1/8" set-up is too
weak for the 6-226 or larger engines -- my 226 wagon trashed a new 1-1/8"
shaft and bearing set in less than 15,000 miles of everyday driving, so I
switched cases to a 1-1/4" version I had in the parts pile. The 1-1/8"
set-up is ok behind my 4-134 engine -- it's never needed attention in 35
years of driving my CJ-2A.
The modification kit is sold by AA for either the 1-1/8" or 1-1/4"
cases. It includes a new special shaft and 2 little cup and cone taper
roller bearing sets. AA includes a diagram to guide a machinist in cutting
your existing intermediate gear for the bearing cups, and afterwards you
should use a dremel tool to grind a couple of recesses inboard of where each
cup will be driven in, so you can drive them out later to replace them if
necessary. They don't tell you this in the instructions, but it's obvious
you'll never be able to replace worn cups unless you create some way to
drive them out before you install them. Only the gear needs to be cut, not
the case. I finally did this mod in my wagon and it's held up with no
problems for the last 25,000 miles or so. It almost (not quite) gets rid of
all of the transfer case whine.
I'd tell you how I learned this stuff, but I'd have to be drunk first.
Way too humiliating otherwise.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick48CJ2A@... <Rick48CJ2A@...>
To: WillysTech@... <WillysTech@...>
Date: Monday, June 21, 1999 6:29 PM
Subject: Re: [WT] How do you remove the OD


From: Rick48CJ2A@...

Morris,
You da man. I'd love to hear how you came to know so much about this topic
someday. You're right of course about the gears not matching up between
the
#18 and #20. Of course I had to take and match them up myself to be
certain.
:-)

You say that the inside diameter of the 1 1/4" and 1 1/8" are the same,
just
a different set of bearings to match the shaft size? Would it be worth the
effort to have the case machined up to fit the 1 1/4" shaft. Then all I
would have to do is buy the thinner bearings and I would be in business.
How
reliable is the 1 1/8" for everyday driving. I'm not talking about rock
crawling or mud slinging, just everyday driving and occasional 4x4.

Can you tell me anything about the mythical cone bearing modification for
the
intermediate shaft. Who sells these kits and what do they include? Does
any
machine work have to be done? Will these kits fit a 1 1/8" t-case or are
they just made for the 1 1/4". Thanks to all of you for the wealth of
information.

Rick S (TX)

In a message dated 6/21/99 3:03:55 PM Central Daylight Time,
mgh@...
writes:

<<
I didn't see any responses to the mix-and-match question about transfer
cases, so here goes:
(1) The #20 case (and many late #18's) had a 4 inch diameter indexing
hole
where it mates to the transmission. The hole in earlier #18's was a shade
over 3 inches. You can generally have an early small hole #18 enlarged to
4.001" to work with a later transmision, but not the other way around, so
some later #18's, or any #20 case, generally cannot be used with an
earlier
transmission which was intended for the small indexing hole.
(2) The oil fill hole on most #20 cases is on the rear face, and when
such
a case is converted to an #18, it will intefere with the driveshaft brake
if
so equipped, or with the speedometer cable if not. For such cases, a new
fill hole must be drilled and tapped in the same location as a #18 fill
hole, and the existing rear fill hole must be plugged with a 1/2"
countersunk pipe plug, available in the plumbing section of a
well-equipped
hardware store (but not at Home Depot).
(3) Although early #18's and late #18's and #20's used
apparently-identical
26 tooth main drive gears, the tooth pitch is different, so they will not
work properly if parts are interchanged.
(4) The 26 tooth Warn overdrive gear was cut to match the early-type
pitch
only.
(5) The inside diameter of the intermediate (middle) gear is the same for
both the 1-1/8" and 1-1/4" shaft cases, so intermediate gears can be
freely
interchanged between cases with those shaft diameters, assuming all other
gears are properly matched. The bearing rollers have smaller diameters
(and
there are more of them) in the later 1-1/4" shaft version, so it is a more
durable arrangement, and you should go with that case if you can.
(6) Willys part numbers for the various gears are fairly useless since
they
are not marked on the parts themselves. Spicer numbers appear on original
parts. Aftermarket parts are not marked with numbers at all, adding to
the
mystery and adventure.
(7) The Spicer number for the intermediate gear for the early-pitch 26
tooth set-up is 18-5-7. The tooth counts are 34/21. It must be used with
an
18-8-18 output gear and 18-8-17 sliding gear. This combination works
properly with a Warn 26-tooth overdrive.
(8) The Spicer number for the intermediate gear for the late-pitch 26
tooth
set-up is 18-5-16. The tooth counts are 34/20. It must be used with an
18-8-44 output gear and 18-8-28 sliding gear. Don't use these gears with
a
Warn 26-tooth overdrive, even though it may seem to fit perfectly.
(9) If you need them, I can give you the numbers for the 29-tooth set up,
but these gears are so obviously different and incompatible with any
26-tooth combination that there's little chance of mismatching your
gears --
you probably wouldn't be able to force all of them into the case at the
same
time.. Ditto for the 27-tooth arrangement used on WWII models.

Others have answered about removing the overdrive -- I agree with those
who
say don't remove the small cover, cotter pin, etc. The main housing is a
tight fit, and may have to be gently pried off with leverage from two
screwdrivers working opposite sides of the housing. The main overdrive
gear
stays behind in the transfer case, and the snap ring is first carefully
removed with long needle-nose pliers The lock plate is then removed and a
1/2" socket extension fits into the female nut. This nut will need a lot
of
force to loosen it (if it was properly installed) because it needed to be
installed as tightly as possible. When reinstalling this gear, use a
breaker bar to put as much torque as you can on the socket wrench
extension,
while either having someone under the hood holding the fan to keep the
engine from turning, or (if the gearshift cover is off) locking up the
transmission by putting it in two gears at once. If the female nut is
not
super-tight, the lockplate and snap ring will not keep everything
together
for very long.

I'd be ashamed to admit how much of this I learned through ridiculous
experience. >>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
WillysTech

NEW! Parts Buy/Sell/Swap Board

Vehicle FAQ Sheets

Parts Resource List

_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
WillysTech

NEW! Parts Buy/Sell/Swap Board

Vehicle FAQ Sheets

Parts Resource List

_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/


Re: 53 M38A1 Gear Ratio?

Merl
 

Merl wrote:

From: Merl <hollowel@...>

Rockiehigh@... wrote:

From: Rockiehigh@...

Morning All,

What were the gear ratio's available on a 53 M38A1? How can i tell which
ratio it has? Did they have id tags?

I have a gentleman who is interested in the D44 from my 62 CJ5...dont want to
sell him something that wont work for him.

Thanks for any input...

John B
45 MB
The ratio should be 5.38:1, same as for the 2A, 3A, M38, etc. The tag
on the differential for this ratio is (if I remember correctly) 43/8.
Just read the above, sounds like the 2A has the same axle...not true.
The ratio is the same in the 2A but the axle itself isn't.
--

"Never pound on the threaded ****
end of *anything*!" ** **
** mailto:hollowel@... **
Merl ****


A good chuckle - Godzilla SUV

Mike Boyink
 

See the "classic" Jeep antithesis at


Mike Boyink
Holland, MI
1966 CJ5
1983 6.2 GMC Rally Van (towdog)


Re: 53 M38A1 Gear Ratio?

Merl
 

Rockiehigh@... wrote:

From: Rockiehigh@...

Morning All,

What were the gear ratio's available on a 53 M38A1? How can i tell which
ratio it has? Did they have id tags?

I have a gentleman who is interested in the D44 from my 62 CJ5...dont want to
sell him something that wont work for him.

Thanks for any input...

John B
45 MB
The ratio should be 5.38:1, same as for the 2A, 3A, M38, etc. The tag
on the differential for this ratio is (if I remember correctly) 43/8.
--

"Never pound on the threaded ****
end of *anything*!" ** **
** mailto:hollowel@... **
Merl ****