Re: Okay, THIS you won't believe
I heard that Karen Bass was in Valley Village today at their 4th of July parade!! From: <[email protected]> on behalf of robfrankel <rob@...> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
By
Sheri Herman
·
#1919
·
|
Okay, THIS you won't believe
This is what an arrogant idiot looks like: https://twitter.com/i/status/1543610674873438208 ( https://twitter.com/i/status/1543610674873438208 ) -- Rob Frankel Chief Curmudgeon
By
robfrankel
·
#1918
·
|
Why the SCOTUS EPA decision is so important
While?the Dobbs decision was getting all the attention last week, a decision that was way more far-reaching also emanated from SCOTUS, as they reined in the power of the EPA for overreach.?
By
robfrankel
·
#1917
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Exactly as proven by 2000 Mules by the Arizona Attorney General's office.? Caught her red-handed ballot harvesting:
By
robfrankel
·
#1916
·
|
Re: Amazing! Israel to be the FIRST Country in the World to Pipe Desalinated Water into a Sinking Freshwater Lake!
The elites want us to suffer and die. They are shutting down nuke plants. Next we starve. [email protected]> wrote:
By
Allyson Taylor
·
#1915
·
|
Amazing! Israel to be the FIRST Country in the World to Pipe Desalinated Water into a Sinking Freshwater Lake!
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Janet Levy <janetlevyross@...> Date: Tue, Jun 28, 2022, 8:06 AM Subject: Amazing! Israel to be the FIRST Country in the World to Pipe Desalinated
By
Allyson Taylor
·
#1914
·
|
An excellent week
Just goes to show you that hard work, diligence and the United States Constitution is stronger than people think.? As of today, SCOTUS has ruled: 1. Roe v. Wade is gone.? The question of abortion is
By
robfrankel
·
#1913
·
|
Re: June Primary Ballots
Mine turned out to be voting notification. -- Rob Frankel Chief Curmudgeon
By
robfrankel
·
#1912
·
|
June Primary Ballots
Hi All, Just following up.? Remember those who said they got a second mail-in ballot for the June Primary? Was it a real ballot or just more voting information? In the interest of confidence in our
By
Sheri Herman
·
#1911
·
|
Meanwhile, in Arizona for your proof pleasure
From the Arizona Sun Times: https://arizonasuntimes.com/2022/06/11/maricopa-county-spokesperson-admits-20000-late-ballots-were-scanned-before-verification-expert-says-likely-a-crime/ In an email
By
robfrankel
·
#1910
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Oops.....here's Cathy's message: -- Rob Frankel Chief Curmudgeon
By
robfrankel
·
#1909
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
The tax return I sent to you is factual. It¡¯s a shame no one in your group is capable or reading or understanding what it says and apparently that includes you as well. Maybe you didn¡¯t notice
By
Cathy Larimer
·
#1908
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Giggled!!!! [email protected]> wrote:
By
Allyson Taylor
·
#1907
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Cathy, Typical response. ?? I know how to delete emails. Maybe you should call your IT person and learn how to reply to only the sender and not the whole group. ? Sheri From:
By
Sheri Herman
·
#1906
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Well folks, it appears that Cathy has become completely unhinged, so I won't be approving her last two posts, which are nothing but vitriolic personal attacks. I'll archive them for future amusement.
By
robfrankel
·
#1905
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
And there you have it: Another liberal who cannot support her laziness and emotionalism with any factual data, resorting to distractions and personal attacks because that's all she's got left.
By
robfrankel
·
#1904
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Nice try but no cigar. To recap, you are saying Catherine loaned the money to the corp? Yet the corp only shows assets on their Balance Sheet. How do you explain that? Maybe you should either clean
By
Cathy Larimer
·
#1903
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Sherri, Frankly, I do not know how to remove you from this group test, but I am so sorry that you have 5 whole emails in your inbox and it is distressing you. If you don¡¯t know how to use the delete
By
Cathy Larimer
·
#1902
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
Cathy, If you and Rob want to continue with this discussion, please email each other and don¡¯t include me. You are filling up my inbox. I don¡¯t know if anyone else minds a ton of back and forth
By
Sheri Herman
·
#1901
·
|
Re: You wanted proof? Here's some
"Absolutely true", you sure of that? While the Texas Corporation code that was cited in the article does say that loans to a director are prohibited: Sec. 22.225. LOAN TO DIRECTOR PROHIBITED. (a) A
By
David Nelson
·
#1900
·
|