Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Repeater-Builder
- Messages
Search
Re: DB4032 duplexor
Tedd Doda
On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 23:02:56 -0500, mch wrote:
Can you both post your charts on a web page somewhere?Mine is just a partial drawing, but I'd be more than happy to post it. I'm just looking into getting a scanner (the CD-R had priority, hi). If I scan it, can you post it somewhere? Mines a copy of copy, but I may be able to redraw it using StarOffice. Would that be better... Tedd Doda CET packet va3sed@va3sed e-mail lazer@... |
Re: DB4032 duplexor
Kevin K. Custer W3KKC
mch wrote:
From: mch <mch@...>I can..... Please send (as a web page if possible) to me directly. If you don't know how to do html, I'll copy and paste into a web page. send to kuggie@... Kevin |
Re: NHRC controller
Ray J. Vaughan
At 11:55 PM 3/4/99 EST, you wrote:
From: SS409SS@...I use some of their other models. Great simple easy controllers. If you do decide to try it, please join my NHRC list here at onelist. Ray J. Vaughan, MS, CBTE KD4BBM PG-7-15266 ray@... |
Re: DB4032 duplexor
mch
Can you both post your charts on a web page somewhere?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Perhaps Kevin could put it on the RBTIP. :) If not, I can E-mail you a fax number privately. Thanks, Joe, KR3P Tedd Doda wrote:
|
Re: DB4032 duplexor
csnichol
Tedd,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I use on of these on my repeater. I got some conversion info from an Engineer at Decibel back in 95. The drawing is not an offical engineering drawing and has a number mkt019/a on it you might see if you can get it. Cable measurements are cut lengths, connectors not included Open the cans and trim the helix to 7 1/4 turns. Pop rivet the cans back together on the low freq side... Can to Tee length 14 3/4 Shorted stub length 19 1/2 Interconnect (Qty 2) 29 1/2 On the high freq side... Can to Tee length 29 1/2 Open stub length 21 1/2 Interconnect (Qty 2) 41 3/4 For the arms of the Y cable at the antenna port 41 3/4 Qty 2 I used the long stub to make the short ones. I made new long stubs I did not change anything alse in the harness as it was darn close and it works for me. If you cant get the document from decibel I will send you a copy. Chris N9LLO Tedd Doda wrote:
|
Re: DB4032 duplexor
Tedd Doda
Hi Chris:
On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 19:34:36 -0800, csnichol wrote: I use on of these on my repeater. I got some conversion info from anOn one of the sheets that I have, there is a drawing number 040020 issue "G". I would have thought that the length of the cables would have to be modified, as the cans were on 45.140 / 46.190, and they will be going up almost 8 megs? Now I don't know if this drawing belongs to these exact cavities, so some differences may crop up. After your dimensions, I'll put in what is on my drawing: Open the cans and trim the helix to 7 1/4 turns.To get the cans in our band with the adjuster near mid range, I shorted 2 turns of the helix at the "open" end. This way, the cans can be returned to "stock". Is it better to just trim the copper? on the low freq side...same ("A" on my drawing) Shorted stub length 19 1/2This is strange. My drawing shows a value of 15" with a split up to 1 MHz, and no stub if 1 meg or higher? Interconnect (Qty 2)same On the high freq side...same Open stub length 21 1/2Mine shows 27" up to 1 meg, and no stub if 1 meg or more. Interconnect (Qty 2) 41 3/4same same I used the long stub to make the short ones.I would like the duplexor to work as best it can Chris, so do you think optimizing the dimensions for our band will yield any better response? If you cant get the document from decibel I will send you a copy.I think our drawing are very close. All the cables are lettered "A" to "E" in a chart and the chart has 3 rows, 400 to 600 Khz, 600 to 1000 Khz, and 1 meg or more (being the RX/TX separation). My cans are rated from 45 to 50 megs, so increasing the operating frequency by about 10%, should decrease the length of the cables by that amount...no? Do you have DB's web address? Thanks for all the help Chris.... Tedd Doda CET packet va3sed@va3sed e-mail lazer@... |
Re: DB4032 duplexor
de Ric KK5RIC
Very good, you Momma did not raise no fool.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
de Rick kk5ric At 19:34 04-03-99 -0800, you wrote:
From: csnichol <csnichol@...> |
Re: NHRC controller
In a message dated 3/5/99 0:27:02 AM EST, ray@... writes:
<< I use some of their other models. Great simple easy controllers. If you do decide to try it, please join my NHRC list here at onelist. Ray J. Vaughan, MS, CBTE KD4BBM PG-7-15266 ray@... >> Too late Ray!! I am already on your list! Tnx Richy :-) |
Repeater list server comments??
Kevin K. Custer W3KKC
Hi Gang,
A bunch of you that are subscribed here are also subscribed to the Repeater list at onelist. I am also subscribed to it and the GE list at qth.net. I received this attached email from the GE server. I thought the comments in this attachment from the co-moderator of that list were "interesting" to say the least. I am now not certain what the main interest and objective is on that list...?? Please be it known that this list is NOT biased for GE or Motorola or any other brand, and since this list is for repeater builders, repeater discussion IS the primary tone of interest here. The original email was received on March 04 1999, Today...... Kevin Custer, Repeater-Builder List Owner. |
Re: Decibel Products DB-224s on sale
Ken Califf
I looked on their web page, and the price was $463.40 for the one in the ham
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
band. DPW wrote: From: DPW <dpw@...> |
Re: GE Ranger for 6 meters? [update]
Chuck Wood
YEP
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
73S CHUCK -----Original Message-----
From: mch <mch@...> To: repeater-builder@... <repeater-builder@...> Date: Tuesday, March 02, 1999 1:02 PM Subject: [repeater-builder] Re: GE Ranger for 6 meters? [update] From: mch <mch@...> |
Re: GE Ranger for 6 meters? [update]
Chuck Wood
THE HIGH SPLIT RANGER WORKS FROM 35-50 IN A MOBILE ENVIORNMENT NO FILTERING
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
IS NECESSARY. I REALLY DONT BELIEVE THIS BABY MONITOR OR CORDLESS THING. IF YOU WANT TO USE IT AS A RPT. DO THE NORMAL PASS CAVITY STUFF. BUT PREFERABILY GET A MASTER II LOW BAND AND BUY THE XTALS AND DO IT THAT WAY. IF YOU CAN LOCATE A BASE STATION THEY ARE CONTINUOUS DUTY. MY SIX METER RPT IS A LINKED VOTED SYSTEM WHERE THE RECEIVERS ARE LOCATED AWAY FROM THE XMITTER AND LINKED AND VOTED. ONE OF THE RECEIVERS IS A RANGER AND I HAVE NOT HAD ONE BIT OF TROUBLE WITH IT ON SIX. THE REASON WE ARE USING GE RADIOS INSTEAD OF MOTOROLA IS THAT GE HAS SEPERATE RCVRS AND XMITTERS ON THE XTAL RADIOS WHERE MOTO HAS THEM ALL ON ONE BOARD. LOOK AT THEM. YOU CAN PUT A GE VHF RCVR AND AUHF XMITTER TOGETHER AND HAVE A INSTANT LINK. ALSO THEY ARE BASIC RADIOS THAT ARE OF THE LAST AND BEST XTAL GENERATION. THEY ARE EXTREMELY TIGHT,SIMPLE, EASIALLY AVAILABLE AND OVER ALL VERY GOOD BE IT THE MVP THE EXEC II OR THE MASTER II . A FRIEND ONCE TOLD ME TO QUIT MESSING WITH MOTO WHICH YOU HAD TO CHANGE CAPS AND DO EXTENSIVE MODS ON TO GET INTO THE HAM BANDS AND USE GE INSTEAD. I FINALLY LOOKED AT THEM AND REALIZED THEY WERE THE BEST FOR HAM USE. I HAVE BEEN LOOKING AT ALL THIS TALK ON THE NET ABOUT GE VS MOTO AND REALIZE SOME OF THESE GUYS ARE WHERE I WAS 10-15 YEARS AGO. TRUST ME UNLESS THE MOTO IS ALREADY A REPEATER AND ON THE BAND YOU WANT YOU CANT BEAT THE GE STUFF. AND I DARE ANY ONE TO TELL ME THE DIFFERENCE BY LISTENING TO IT. ALSO YOUR GE UHF RANGER DOES NOT HAVE HELICALS THE RANGER SERIES HAD A TUNED FILTER THAT WAS NOT A HELICAL IT WAS SOME SORT OF FIXED XTAL FILTER. LOOK AT IT THERE ARE NO TUNING SLUGS.-- GOOD LUCK KEEP ME POSTED. CHUCK WD6APP--Original Message-----
From: Tedd Doda <lazer@...> To: repeater-builder@... <repeater-builder@...> Date: Tuesday, March 02, 1999 10:34 AM Subject: [repeater-builder] Re: GE Ranger for 6 meters? [update] From: "Tedd Doda" <lazer@...>BUT THERE ARE MANY WAYS OF EASIALLY FILTERING THEM. ISERIOUSLY DOUBT THAT AI'd like to hear your ideas about filtering. Because I'm using |
Re: GE Ranger for 6 meters? [update]
Tedd Doda
Hi Chuck:
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999 08:11:35 -0800, Chuck Wood wrote: I HAVE ONE ON A MOUNTAIN 3500 FEET NO PROBLEM. YES THEY ARE WIDE BAND. BUTI'd like to hear your ideas about filtering. Because I'm using notch only filters, each offending frequency would need it's own filter. Is there a "intermod" style filter available for 6? YOU CANNOT DUPLEX A PLL RADIO THEY MUSTThanks. ANYONE WHO DOESNT WANT THEIRI've decided to get a couple to try them out. As I mentioned before, I have a UHF Ranger, and it works very well, in a high RF neighbourhood, probably due to the helical resonator front end. ALSO THE C.H.P. HASOn 6 meters??? Thanks for the input. Tedd Doda CET packet va3sed@va3sed e-mail lazer@... |
Re: Member Update
Cristobal Inos
Kevin K. Custer W3KKC wrote:
March 3, 1999 I am not too sure whether we can do business in this list...it has to do with linking repeaters. If anyone in the list is interested, please contact me at: soni@.... thanks chris inos wh6um |
Re: Decibel Products DB-224s on sale
Cristobal Inos
DPW wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
|
Re: GE Ranger for 6 meters? [update]
Chuck Wood
I HAVE ONE ON A MOUNTAIN 3500 FEET NO PROBLEM. YES THEY ARE WIDE BAND. BUT
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
THERE ARE MANY WAYS OF EASIALLY FILTERING THEM. ISERIOUSLY DOUBT THAT A BABY MONITOR COULD CAUSE PROBLEMS. YOU CANNOT DUPLEX A PLL RADIO THEY MUST BE XTAL OR YOU NEED TO USE TWO OF THEM . ANYONE WHO DOESNT WANT THEIR RANGERS JUST SEND THEM TO ME ILL SUFFER WITH THEM. ALSO THE C.H.P. HAS ABOUT 5000 OF THESE IN THEIR FLEET THEY MUST BE O.K.. CHUCK WD6APP -----Original Message-----
From: Tedd Doda <lazer@...> To: repeater-builder@... <repeater-builder@...> Date: Monday, March 01, 1999 1:15 PM Subject: [repeater-builder] Re: GE Ranger for 6 meters? [update] From: "Tedd Doda" <lazer@...>ONE OF THE BEST SIX METER RADIOS GOING. IF YOU HAVE A CHANCE TO GET THEM DO.I was talking to a GE service rep., and he also said that |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss