¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Re: TNC to Radio cables
thanks to all that responded. Great info. 73 Lee [email protected]> wrote:
By Lee - WB4QOJ · #2000 ·
Re: TNC to Radio cables
Associated Radio has cables for kantronics tnc¡¯s and others, many are listed on eBay. Jim KI0BK
By Jim - KI0BK · #1999 ·
Re: TNC to Radio cables
Hi Lee,That was me. Les, WY0GTR owns Ham Made Parts. Has been making me TNC cables for years with no problems.https://hammadeparts.com/73 de Chris ww2bsa
By Chris Lance WW2BSA · #1998 ·
Re: TNC to Radio cables
https://hammadeparts.com/? Ham Made Parts hammadeparts.com Quality is 1st rate. I have purchased several cables and have been very pleased. Mark N2UEM
By Mark Acierno · #1997 ·
TNC to Radio cables
If I remember correctly a while back someone posted that there is someone that makes cables to order for TNC to Radio. i.e. Kantronics, MFJ and so on. Who is that does anyone have the info and
By Lee - WB4QOJ · #1996 ·
Just a question on MFJ 1278BDSP
Has anyone ever used a MFJ- 1278BDSP for Multiple Modes...including Packet. The DSP model may be better not sure. I have used 1270-B-C and 1274 models all did well even as stand alone nodes with
By Lee - WB4QOJ · #1995 ·
Re: Packet - what do you consider a "logable" contact?
Thanks all! I think this is where we begin to loose interest by the "younger" generations. I do not see anywhere in the definition and purpose of amateur radio that we continue to do things the same
By Christopher Molnar KO4YAW · #1994 ·
Re: Packet - what do you consider a "logable" contact?
Why not? If I can log a FT4, FT8, RTTY, or any other digital QSO on HF and get credit for it on my WAC or any other award, then why can't I log a PKT QSO?Chris ww2bsa
By Chris Lance WW2BSA · #1993 ·
Re: Packet - what do you consider a "logable" contact?
Well, Being an Old Fart Operator, I would consider, that only a Direct Keyboard to Keyboard Connect (no Digipeating), whereas you have an actual QSO, with an actual signal report, as a log worthy
By WR0RR Randy Rethlake · #1992 ·
Re: Packet - what do you consider a "logable" contact?
No one has ever logged a packet contact in the past. Keeping a log of paths and nodes maybe.
By Bill - AC0VC · #1991 ·
Re: Packet - what do you consider a "logable" contact?
#5 only. Think of keyboard to keyboard like a voice QSO.In my early days, I made a DX contact on 10 meters FM via a 440 link through? a 10 meter repeater. Didn't count as it wasn't direct. The
By Chris Lance WW2BSA · #1990 ·
Re: Packet - what do you consider a "logable" contact?
#5 ¨C good advice. Joseph D. Yuna Joseph D. Yuna (LCDR USN/ret.) 1006 River Hills Rd. Beavercreek, OH 45430-1124 United States of America Primary: +617.943.2635 <mailto:W4JDY1953@...>
By W4JDY · #1989 ·
Re: Packet - what do you consider a "logable" contact?
Correct, but someone needs to tell the ARRL staff about this for US Licensed operators: Full Title: Elimination of logging requirements in the Amateur Radio Service Document Type: Notice of Proposed
By W4JDY · #1988 ·
Re: Packet - what do you consider a "logable" contact?
I only log #5.? If I used an intermediary station, I add that to the notes so I know what path I used to get the log entry. -Scott
By Scott VE3QBZ · #1987 ·
Re: Packet - what do you consider a "logable" contact?
I would clarify a bit by the purpose of the ¡°log¡±. Personally, I log all activity, band, power, mode, etc. This helps me if there are ever interference complaints, etc. I do this whether there¡¯s
By N1UGK · #1986 ·
Re: Packet - what do you consider a "logable" contact?
I don't know that there is a right or wrong answer. I only log 5 since that's a two-way contact with another ham. 1-4 are a two-way contact with an automatically controlled digital station or message
By Ben Kuhn - KU0HN · #1985 ·
Packet - what do you consider a "logable" contact?
Good Evening Net105'rs! (Before I ask this question I want to clarify I am in the US so logging is not required by the FCC - just in case this is see in other countries.) In your opinion what do you
By Christopher Molnar KO4YAW · #1984 ·
Re: Seeking a Timewave PK232MBX w/ firmware 7.1 or higher
For that price, one could have bought a SCS modem. Joseph D. Yuna Joseph D. Yuna (LCDR USN/ret.) 1006 River Hills Rd. Beavercreek, OH 45430-1124 United States of America Primary: +617.943.2635
By W4JDY · #1983 ·
Re: Net 30 (or 30M Packet)
It seems like that's mainly APRS traffic? I'll move to 10144 LSB + 1700 for the rest of the day. Cheers, Steve K4RVA Colorado Springs DM78pv
By Steve K4RVA · #1982 ·
Re: Net 30 (or 30M Packet)
A couple of months ago I had heard 300bd packet activity at 10149.0 and 10149.3 center frequency, or 10147.3 USB + 1700 Hz and + 2000 Hz, but it's been a while since I've tried monitoring there. I
By Steve K4RVA · #1981 ·