Re: Packet - what do you consider a "logable" contact?
|
? #5 ¨C good advice. ? Joseph D. Yuna
Joseph D. Yuna (LCDR USN/ret.) 1006 River Hills Rd. Beavercreek, OH 45430-1124 United States of America Primary:? +617.943.2635 W4JDY1953@... ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Scott VE3QBZ via groups.io
Sent: Monday, 27 May, 2024 10:24
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [network105] Packet - what do you consider a "logable" contact?? I only log #5.? If I used an intermediary station, I add that to the notes so I know what path I used to get the log entry. ? -Scott ?? On 2024-05-26 21:07, Christopher Molnar KO4YAW via groups.io wrote: Good Evening Net105'rs!
(Before I ask this question I want to clarify I am in the US so logging is not required by the FCC - just in case this is see in other countries.)
In your opinion what do you consider a contact that can be logged in packet modes? examples:
1) A new user logs into a packet BBS via RF
2) A packet user leaves you a message on your BBS and you reply
3) You successfully connect to another packet station and leave a message
4) You read a message someone left for you on another station and reply to it
5) You have a keyboard to keyboard chat with another operator via HF
6) You hear another stations beacon
In my opinion:
2-5 should be a logged contact
6 - nah, I can't see that as logged
1 - I sort of think this is a valid contact, they did connect via RF and used the BBS to setup an account.
What are your thoughts?
73,
de Chris - KO4YAW
|
W4JDY