开云体育

Hi Bruce, The VNA frequency accuracy is spec. I believe it is less than 0.5 ppm. You can set the unit into a CW mode or essentially zero span. Hence you can count the output. Place a counter on

Also, go to this site and read this paper: https://coppermountaintech.com/measurement-of-electronic-component-impedance-using-a-vector-network-analyzer/ Alan

Hi John. You are correct. As the device under test, DUT, has a |Z| << Zo or >> Zo, accuracy suffers. This is why the performance and accuracy of the open and short cal pieces are so important.

qrp.ddc, This is what I needed. I did not have cables with any other impedances so I could not test the cascaded impedances case. Thanks for uploading the file. Looks like hwalker has solved your

I am curious if/how the frequency accuracy could be assessed with the nanoVNA. I assume it would involve a signal generator of known frequency, but I wasn't sure what the typical procedure would be,

My point is, if you buy a nanoVNA which comes with a cal kit, what accuracy can you reasonably expect from it? That is what I'd like to determine. It's a perfectly tractable problem given enough

When ordering from aliexpress be sure to read what is included. A lot of the units do not have batteries installed. Look for the following statement, "Batteries are not included due to the safety of

Turns out it was a broken pin on an SMA connector. I went looking for the missing pin and found it in my SpyVerter. Was lucky enough to dig it out with a sewing needle. Since I won't be using the

Hum, 3 time what paid for not much wider...Maybe the tft would be brighter in sunlight. Still no longer 50$ ?

Make that $31.99 with free shipping!? Incredible!? A VNA used to be $50,000! Rob

Joe, I don't know what you are looking for.? Mine doesn't have the shielding, but it appears to work pretty well to me.? I see them as low as $33.99 with free shipping from aliexpress.? I suppose

For what it's worth - I received mine today (a day sooner than expected) from ST-EC which had a 99.1% positive rating. It is shielded and works very well at HF compared to a $500 AIM 4170D. I don't

Hello all, Am I correct in thinking that as reactance (of an inductor or capacitor whose value is unknown) moves further and further away from 50 ohms, that a nanoVNA would quickly become less

In this kind of open hardware environment it seems like it falls to the customer to do the quality control. So what should a novice VNA user like myself look at in my new nanoVNA? I don't have access

I bought these boxes to put my EasyDigi boards in. My NanoVNA came in today and fits perfectly in one of those

Please, tis is handled earlier in: NanoVNA does not want to start -solved You are right, the PDF is from the IP5306, but the pin 5 commands work the same. I post it anyway. It is a good alternative. I

Just to confuse matters, I decided to take that same Kenwood antenna and using some metal clamp on a large, random ground plane, I got very different results, where the return loss was larger (-23.734

Erik, Are you implying that a regular NanoVNA with latest Hugen firmware will not work with this TAPR software? if so, I'm sorry to hear it. If it would work with Hugen's firmware, even using 101

Oeps, stupid me. Something to do... Greetz Ton - PA0ARR

Calibrate, calibrate, do it to the music... We used to sing that song all day in the lab! Ok, so will the real good cal standards please stand up! Sounds like you found an (or) THE issue.