Lw/ Mv and 160m.. which rx antenna?
Hi
been playing around with ft8 on 160m.. on psk reporter heard in vk etc.. ( when band open.)
tx and rx antenna is a Marconi T. However rx in said directions from here is poor. ( see below.)
Live
By
Simon
·
#21233
·
|
SAL - 20 for sale
I have a SAL-20 antenna for sale.? Contact me off list for details.
73l
Bill, WA2DVUCape May. NJ609 425 8651bill.riches@...
By
Bill Riches
·
#21232
·
|
Re: File /MODIFIED AMRAD PREAMP - 20 MARCH 2025.docx uploaded
#file-notice
@Dave, Martin
i am on a weekend trip. Will be back soon and try to answer your questions.
regards, Fred
By
Fred M
·
#21231
·
|
Re: File /MODIFIED AMRAD PREAMP - 20 MARCH 2025.docx uploaded
#file-notice
I couldn't agree more, Fred. Audio, yes. ... RF, likely not. But what
about below 100 kHz where most of my application lands? I'm primarily
interested in "DC" through 100 or so kHz.
Dave -
By
W0LEV
·
#21230
·
|
Re: Modified AMRAD
Hi Fred,
I've had a look at your circuit diagrams, and wondered if you could clarify a point for me.
I'd assumed that placing an active current source, in place of the source resistor, would set the
By
Martin - Southwest UK
·
#21229
·
|
Re: Modified AMRAD
A better way to improve large-signal handling is to replace the source resistor of the input FET with an active current source. This increases linearity and also reduces the gain loss of the source
By
Fred M
·
#21228
·
Edited
|
Re: Modified AMRAD
Yes i know, but this is comparing apples with oranges. The Ikin Amp is a balanced very low Z Input amplifier for magnetic loops. The current discussion is about Hi-Z impedance change amplifiers for
By
Fred M
·
#21227
·
|
Re: Modified AMRAD
There is a reference here to Andy Ikin's paralleling of FETs, lowering the noise figure.
https://www.shoc.ch/wellbrook.html
The antenna uses 8 very high gain JFETs in parallel push-pull with a
By
Tracey Gardner G5VU
·
#21226
·
|
Re: Modified AMRAD
Yes parallel JFETs can lower the noise at the signal gain is linear and the noise being random adds as root 2 or 41.4% for each doubling. Eventually the gate capacitance will be an issue.
Andrew
By
Andrew Russell
·
#21225
·
|
Re: Modified AMRAD
I would agree.
However, I seem to remember reading that parallelling FET's can improve the overall noise performance, but can't find the reference to quote.
It does however reduce the input
By
Martin - Southwest UK
·
#21224
·
|
Re: Modified AMRAD
I built this circuit and used it for many years. In fact is was my first antenna for NDB DX 10 years ago. I started with 1 FET and experienced some IMD from local AMBCB stations. Then I added 3 more
By
Tom - VE3PSZ
·
#21223
·
|
Re: Modified AMRAD
I doubt, that paralleling FETs in an reactance driven HiZ? application is worth the effort. The noise figure of an Hi-Z FET Amplifier ist primarily dominated by the thermal noise of the Gate bias
By
Fred M
·
#21222
·
Edited
|
Photo LCU Interior.jpg updated
#photo-notice
The following photos have been updated in the Azi-Loop Self-Supporting Structure for Transportable / DXpedition Use ( /g/loopantennas/album?id=301249 ) photo album of the
By
Group Notification <noreply@...>
·
#21220
·
|
File /MODIFIED AMRAD PREAMP - 20 MARCH 2025.docx uploaded
#file-notice
The following items have been added to the Files area of the [email protected] group.
* /MODIFIED AMRAD PREAMP - 20 MARCH 2025.docx (
By
Group Notification <noreply@...>
·
#21219
·
|
Re: Modified AMRAD
/g/loopantennas/files/Modified%20AMRAD%20eProbe%20Antenna.pdf
By
Everett N4CY
·
#21218
·
|
Re: Modified AMRAD
That will teach me for DL'ing so quickly LOL.....can you post a URL to the corrected document? 73
Gedas, W8BYA EN70JT
Light travels faster than sound.....
This is why some people appear bright until
By
Gedas
·
#21217
·
|
Modified AMRAD
I made the corrections that Martin mentioned and I also add the Bias adjustment procedure to the posting and deleted the 2 original postings.
?Everett N4CY
By
Everett N4CY
·
#21216
·
|
Re: "active antenna preamplifiers" in ham radio May 1986
Thanks Martin, I will correct it.
Everett
Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS
By
Everett N4CY
·
#21215
·
|
Re: "active antenna preamplifiers" in ham radio May 1986
Thanks Dave!
Andrea
[email protected]> ha scritto:
By
Andrea Dalbagno
·
#21214
·
|
Re: "active antenna preamplifiers" in ham radio May 1986
Hi Everett,
Incidentally, note that in your schematic, one of the input diodes, seems to have the wrong polarity.
Personally, I'd bias them to ensure decent IMD performance, but maybe you have
By
Martin - Southwest UK
·
#21213
·
|